So, which one of you lot is the one-in-twenty?

Littlelegs

Well-Known Member
Joined
25 February 2012
Messages
9,355
Visit site
When my mare was in full work & mega fit, she was 500- 515kg (full up 14.2 connie x tb). And I was mega thin pre pregnancy & around 8stone, so I would have been in the 10%. At the moment, without a weighbridge I'm guessing she's about 460-480, & I'm 9stone in full winter riding kit, so apparently too heavy.
Amusingly, I suspect my daughter is also heading over the 10% mark. She's 8, tall & twig like, & a year or so ago weighed 4 stone. I suspect she is now perhaps 4/5lb over that as she's grown in height, although seemingly not in width. Which means she is just above the 25kg her fine boned 11.1 should carry. Admittedly the fine boned aspect means I wouldn't want more than 6&1/2 stone on the pony, but I think it will be almost impossible to find another jockey for a whizzy second pony that is under 4stone in full riding gear.
 

Littlelegs

Well-Known Member
Joined
25 February 2012
Messages
9,355
Visit site
When my mare was in full work & mega fit, she was 500- 515kg (full up 14.2 connie x tb). And I was mega thin pre pregnancy & around 8stone, so I would have been in the 10%. At the moment, without a weighbridge I'm guessing she's about 460-480, & I'm 9stone in full winter riding kit, so apparently too heavy.
Amusingly, I suspect my daughter is also heading over the 10% mark. She's 8, tall & twig like, & a year or so ago weighed 4 stone. I suspect she is now perhaps 4/5lb over that as she's grown in height, although seemingly not in width. Which means she is just above the 20kg her fine boned 11.1 should carry. Admittedly the fine boned aspect means I wouldn't want more than 6&1/2 stone on the pony, but I think it will be almost impossible to find another jockey for a whizzy second pony that is under 4stone in full riding gear.
 

YorksG

Over the hill and far awa
Joined
14 September 2006
Messages
16,236
Location
West Yorkshire
Visit site
Stupid phone. And a correction, apparently my daughters pony should have a rider of approx 3 stone.


That's likely to happen any time soon then :p What wasn't explained in the article was how the 10% figure was reached as the optimum, now it may have been in the journal article, but it doesn't sound like it was :confused:
 

twobearsarthur

Well-Known Member
Joined
21 October 2008
Messages
1,069
Location
West Yorkshire
Visit site
My BMI would be less than 14 if I weighed what I should to ride mine which would have me at nearly 6ft weighing 7 stones!!! I would also be eligible to be sectioned under the Mental Health Act!!! For having an eating disorder. She's a 16hh WBxID
 

rara007

Well-Known Member
Joined
2 April 2007
Messages
28,579
Location
Essex
Visit site
Well my 17hh weigh tapes 526 KG so I'm over 10kg too big for him, let alone my 375 and 325 ponies...
I don't think I know many people under 10%! Jump jockeys must be over that?
 

littlemisslauren

Well-Known Member
Joined
17 March 2008
Messages
3,422
Visit site
Some of the weights on this thread have concerned me (Horse not human - I'm a right fatty at the min)

Weigh tapes are tosh for telling you what your horse actually weighs. They can be a good tool to measure changes in shape but not weight.

I strongly recommend those who rely on weigh tapes to get your horses to a weigh bridge and see what they actually weigh. You will be suprised.

Unless we all know the TRUE weight of our horses then this agument is surely void?
 

dafthoss

Well-Known Member
Joined
15 October 2010
Messages
4,808
Visit site
Well as the paper relies on weight tape measurements which are notoriously inaccurate and she is unable to give any reference for where she got the magical 10% from I'll leave her to it thanks. Yes I did read it but no I didn't pay for it ;) (but it provided a bit more distraction from the work I'm supposed to be writing)

As it is I'm 11% on YP from his actual weight on a weigh bridge and we are both very happy with the arrangement. I also squish smaller ponies who don't see bothered by carrying me.
 

TrasaM

Well-Known Member
Joined
19 May 2012
Messages
4,742
Location
Midlands
Visit site
17.2 at 480kg?! :eek:

Yes, seems a bit low. I ride a 17hh IDx and she's quite slim and not very fit at the moment and weighs 620kg. We are really lucky to have a local vets we can walk to and get weighted.
The 14.2hh cob is 528 and could carry a bit more weight too.
 

Moomin1

Well-Known Member
Joined
28 July 2010
Messages
7,969
Visit site
Yes, seems a bit low. I ride a 17hh IDx and she's quite slim and not very fit at the moment and weighs 620kg. We are really lucky to have a local vets we can walk to and get weighted.
The 14.2hh cob is 528 and could carry a bit more weight too.

My 16.3hh is 670kg warmblood type
 

SNORKEY

Well-Known Member
Joined
28 December 2008
Messages
1,809
Location
Hampshire
Visit site
My 15.3hh should only be carrying 8 stone! I better state that in his advert when I sell him then! And good luck any 8 stone person controlling him! Lol
 

Jesstickle

Well-Known Member
Joined
11 December 2008
Messages
12,299
Visit site
Well as the paper relies on weight tape measurements which are notoriously inaccurate and she is unable to give any reference for where she got the magical 10% from I'll leave her to it thanks. Yes I did read it but no I didn't pay for it ;) (but it provided a bit more distraction from the work I'm supposed to be writing)

As it is I'm 11% on YP from his actual weight on a weigh bridge and we are both very happy with the arrangement. I also squish smaller ponies who don't see bothered by carrying me.

She used a weigh tape?! Brilliant. and that is why you need to read the actual paper before you pass comment because clearly her methods are so fundamentally flawed that any conclusion is voided.

Thanks for actually bothering to read it :)
 

*hic*

village idiot :D
Joined
3 March 2007
Messages
13,989
Visit site
She used a weigh tape?! Brilliant. and that is why you need to read the actual paper before you pass comment because clearly her methods are so fundamentally flawed that any conclusion is voided.

Thanks for actually bothering to read it :)

PMSL, where is the like button for you two?
 

Jesstickle

Well-Known Member
Joined
11 December 2008
Messages
12,299
Visit site
There was an article (the same one?) in the Sunday Telegraph and I don't think that referred to research either. As bad as each other newspapers :(

http://www.telegraph.co.uk/news/ukn...ng-the-strain-of-Britains-obesity-crisis.html

Absolutely the are Y&C. I am not getting at the Mail in particular. I hate the misrepresentation of science that ALL our papers seem to go in for in this country.

Why on Earth can't someone who actually understands science review these things for the papers?!

And seriously, WTF is an 'equitation scientist'?! How can anyone actually describe themselves as such a thing. Bizarre and alarming that we think that is the kind of scientist this country needs. I sincerely hope no bright young minds are siphoned away from research to do this kind of guff!
 
Last edited:

YasandCrystal

Well-Known Member
Joined
27 April 2009
Messages
5,588
Location
Essex
Visit site
Absolutely the are Y&C. I am not getting at the Mail in particular. I hate the misrepresentation of science that ALL our papers seem to go in for in this country.

Why on Earth can't someone who actually understands science review these things for the papers?!

I agree. The papers report such inaccuracies and most of the news is just blatant propoganda. It's easy to get sucked into the rubbish that is printed. I stopped getting a daily paper years ago due to the negativity and bias in them. So much information is ommited in the science articles that it is just a nonsense and the journalist may just as well make up the lot. I just buy the local evening paper now.
 

Jesstickle

Well-Known Member
Joined
11 December 2008
Messages
12,299
Visit site
I agree. The papers report such inaccuracies and most of the news is just blatant propoganda. It's easy to get sucked into the rubbish that is printed. I stopped getting a daily paper years ago due to the negativity and bias in them. So much information is ommited in the science articles that it is just a nonsense and the journalist may just as well make up the lot. I just buy the local evening paper now.

I think, I hope, that things like Twitter will really help with this kind of thing. It is great that people who actually know how to interpret this stuff now have a forum to spread knowledge through. The papers are a disaster for an accurate and fair portrayal of research but being able to discuss it back and forth via the internet is a great thing. I know the BBC have started including links to the original papers now when they report an article which is a really positive step. Of course, much of it is still behind a blinking pay wall which clearly needs sorting by the scientific community themselves. I just do not understand why the papers assume their readers are too stupid or too lazy to want to check they are telling the truth!
 
Last edited:

BBP

Well-Known Member
Joined
17 July 2008
Messages
6,513
Visit site
Hands up all you super confident, competent 5.6stone/36kg HHO who would like to take on my bouncy bonkers 14hh pony. He's quite light at 360kg on the weightape, so at 54kgs I think I'll need to ditch a couple of limbs to fit him if no-one else volunteers?
 

TrasaM

Well-Known Member
Joined
19 May 2012
Messages
4,742
Location
Midlands
Visit site
It would be really interesting to know what some of the horses, whose weight has been estimated using a tape, actually weighed.

Really think some of us will have to resort to riding saddle less and naked to comply with the 10% rule :D
 

Jesstickle

Well-Known Member
Joined
11 December 2008
Messages
12,299
Visit site
It would be really interesting to know what some of the horses, whose weight has been estimated using a tape, actually weighed.

Really think some of us will have to resort to riding saddle less and naked to comply with the 10% rule :D

Even then you probably won't make it! I know I wouldn't. I have never ( in adult life) and could never, weigh 45KG. Not even naked!

The study actually concludes ''the suggested 10% guideline appears unrealistic within the general riding population''

but you would never guess that from the article in the Fail!
 

ShadowFlame

Well-Known Member
Joined
6 April 2007
Messages
1,468
Location
West Mids
Visit site
10%? :eek:

So my 14.3hh cob with 10" of bone, who's optimum weight is about 440kg, can only carry a 7st rider? :confused:

Wow... maybe I need to feed him up so I'm within his weight carrying abilities? :D
 

Coldfeet!

Well-Known Member
Joined
18 October 2012
Messages
204
Visit site
Not again.

Must be all that clotted cream, fudge and pasties in Devon and Cornwall.

Ive seem some proper FB men out hunting here and there on friends facebook photo's. The horses dont seem to mind one bit that their riders are on the plump side with moobs and a paunch.

anyway - guilty.
 
Top