Supervet

Jenko109

Well-Known Member
Joined
13 July 2020
Messages
1,744
Visit site
Now I dont normally watch it. In honesty I feel like much of his conversation with customers is put on for the cameras and some of the work he does leaves me feeling uneasy.

https://www.google.com/amp/s/www.da...practice-row-bionic-tortoise-drove-brink.html

I saw this which would indicate that other vets are also in disagreement over some of his practices.

Furthermore, I've just heard him reference his 'ethics committee' who would tell him if the animal had to be put to sleep. Why would he require an ethics committee, unless there have been some serious questions asked?

Just interested in everyone elses opinion.
 

AmyMay

Situation normal
Joined
1 July 2004
Messages
66,617
Location
South
Visit site
I think he’s a wonderful, compassionate, kind and mad scientist (well vet obviously). But just because you can do something it doesn’t mean you should. That’s obviously where the ethics of how far he should push the boundaries comes in. The 2018 case obviously gave him and his practice pause for thought - hence the creation of the committee.
 

ycbm

Einstein would be proud of my Insanity...
Joined
30 January 2015
Messages
58,797
Visit site
I'm afraid he makes my skin crawl in the advert that's been running on telly. What he does always makes me think "just because you can doesn't mean you should".

Having said that, vets are under immense pressure from some owners who want their animals kept alive at all costs.
.
 

TPO

🤠🏴󠁧󠁢󠁳󠁣󠁴󠁿
Joined
20 November 2008
Messages
10,003
Location
Kinross
Visit site
My favourite thing that I know about him is that the Britney Spears hit 'Toxic', co-written by his ex, Cathy Dennis, is supposedly about him.

You learn something new every day!

Never watched his show as what I knew about his practices was definitely not for me.

In full agreement with the "just because you can doesn't mean you should" statement
 

Nicnac

Well-Known Member
Joined
9 May 2007
Messages
8,332
Visit site
I was referred to his clinic with my flat coat who had suspected bone cancer as terribly lame shoulder which didn't respond to normal treatment. I cannot fault the care. As soon as they opened him up and saw it was cancer with a strong suspicion that it had most likely spread, they phoned and they were fully on board with my decision not to wake him up. I had a lovely Danish vet so no contact with NF.

We went back that evening to pick him up and the dignity afforded to my dog was quite something.

I don't agree with a lot of what he does and feel it's too experimental, but on the other hand, by experimenting we learn and others benefit. It's so important to realise when we need to stop - not something he's wired to do.
 

Mrs. Jingle

Well-Known Member
Joined
17 September 2009
Messages
5,619
Location
Deep in Bandit Country
Visit site
I am also in the 'just because you can doesn't always mean you should' camp. Plus I felt his faux emotional struggle and concern sometimes grated and didn't ring quite true with me, all seemed more part of the showmanship performance to cynical old me.

I don't watch him after giving it a go a couple of times and would not want him as a vet for my pets.
 

Ratface

Well-Known Member
Joined
23 September 2021
Messages
3,477
Visit site
Now I dont normally watch it. In honesty I feel like much of his conversation with customers is put on for the cameras and some of the work he does leaves me feeling uneasy.

https://www.google.com/amp/s/www.da...practice-row-bionic-tortoise-drove-brink.html

I saw this which would indicate that other vets are also in disagreement over some of his practices.

Furthermore, I've just heard him reference his 'ethics committee' who would tell him if the animal had to be put to sleep. Why would he require an ethics committee, unless there have been some serious questions asked?
I'm in the "do not strive to keep alive/better a week too early than a day too late camp when it comes to animal euthanasia, whether a pet mouse, cow, horse or tortoise. Don't like the man at all. He seems (to me) like an arrogant, self-serving showman and I'd no sooner take an animal to him than fly in the air.

Just interested in everyone elses opinion.
 

Errin Paddywack

Well-Known Member
Joined
20 June 2019
Messages
6,870
Location
West Midlands
Visit site
I watch this and do cringe at the sickly sweet presentation but I have to admit that the surgeries they show are amazing with what they achieve. I try to focus on the incredible joint replacements and his work on spinal problems. I don't like prosthetic legs/feet but have no idea how I would react if it was my dog and I could afford the treatment. He is a genius and very driven so probably not the easiest person to deal with.
 

ycbm

Einstein would be proud of my Insanity...
Joined
30 January 2015
Messages
58,797
Visit site
I watch this and do cringe at the sickly sweet presentation but I have to admit that the surgeries they show are amazing with what they achieve. I try to focus on the incredible joint replacements and his work on spinal problems. I don't like prosthetic legs/feet but have no idea how I would react if it was my dog and I could afford the treatment. He is a genius and very driven so probably not the easiest person to deal with.

A couple of years back I saw a Westie with two prosthetic implant hind legs, tied up outside a shop. I thought "no, just no". Then the owner came out of the shop and that little dog danced around in complete joy on those two steel rods, waving his front paws in the air, as if he hadn't a care in the world. I'm on the fence about that procedure now, I think I'd want to know the ongoing risks and the ongoing drugs, if any.
.
 
Last edited:

Clodagh

Well-Known Member
Joined
17 August 2005
Messages
26,651
Location
Devon
Visit site
A couple of years back I saw a Westie with two prosthetic implant hind legs, tied up outside a shop. I thought "no, just no". Then the owner came out of the shop and that little dog danced around in complete joy on those two steel rods, waving his front paws in the air, as if he hadn't a care in the world. I'm on the fence about that procedure now, I think I'd want to know the ongoing risks and the ongoing drugs, if any.
.
I think if I had a young dog and could afford it those implant type prosthetics are amazing.
 

Esmae

Well-Known Member
Joined
20 February 2016
Messages
3,293
Visit site
I am fascinated by the science and the engineering, however I do have misgivings regarding the man. I have thought at times that he takes things a step too far, given the life span of the dog and the recovery time of the procedure. That said, some of the results are amazing. I suspect that he comes under the "God and surgeon" joke. What's the difference between God and a surgeon? God doesn't think he's a surgeon!
 

bonny

Well-Known Member
Joined
17 September 2007
Messages
6,700
Visit site
He must be doing something right judging by the size of his practice and the amount of money they must turn over.
 

fetlock

Well-Known Member
Joined
28 August 2017
Messages
2,255
Visit site
I think he’s a kind person who clearly adores animals and he’s a very skilled engineer, but sometimes I do think animals suffer during the process.

As someone else has said, Toxic was allegedly written about him. I love wowing people with that one!

The rumour originated in June 2019 on a gossip site called Popbitch.

Cathy herself said the song was written over the course of a week in Sweden. There are four people credited with writing it. Some of them mght have got a credit for simpy changing one word of course. She did say the song wasn't finished after a couple of days so she edited the lyrics at night in her hotel room. She could have penned the lyrics 99% on her own or tidied them up after input from all of them. Far as I can find when searching on it, that's not absolutely clear.



1660383228924.png

And according to Helen the Vet...

 
Last edited:

CorvusCorax

'It's only a laugh, no harm done'
Joined
15 January 2008
Messages
59,299
Location
End of the pier
Visit site
The rumour originated in June 2019 on a gossip site called Popbitch.

Cathy herself said the song was written over the course of a week in Sweden. There are four people credited with writing it. Some of them mght have got a credit for simpy changing one word of course. She did say the song wasn't finished after a couple of days so she edited the lyrics at night in her hotel room. She could have penned the lyrics 99% on her own or tidied them up after input from all of them. Far as I can find when searching on it, that's not absolutely clear.



View attachment 97608

And according to Helen the Vet...


Thanks for the 'splain, I still think he's a man who experiments on other people's pet animals and would eat himself if he was made of chocolate :)
 

misst

Well-Known Member
Joined
29 January 2008
Messages
5,935
Visit site
So many years ago he was the last resort for my 6yo JRT who had mysteriously stopped weight bearing on her rt fore. She was needing to be carried everywhere and very unhappy. She was in obvious pain but every test came back normal. We were seriously looking at PTS after 6 weeks as nothing helped and she was getting more distressed. We were ref to Fitzpatricks and I was reluctant to go because of the things I had seen.
NF was super kind to me who was a blubbering wreck. He diagnosed her immediately almost on sight with a radial nerve paralysis. Scans showed a minute cyst on her nerve up in the brachial plexus. Amputation on dog of her build (queen anne legs and stocky body) was not an option, he felt. Eventually we tried massive doses of steroids for the inflamation. It worked beautifully though I had a fat dog for a year.
He was amazing with me and my dog adored him. So although I disagree with some of the advanced stuff he does, he also does a lot of routine stuff. He saved her life.
When the same dog was 12 she developed a massive epulis on her gum which grew back after simple removal by vet. I agreed for Fitzpatrick soft tissue establishment to see her. Initially I declined the surgery which involved removal of 6 teeth and a piece of jaw bone and some gum. I was advised (not by NF but by his soft tissue/cancer consultant) she would need to be PTS soon as it was growing so rapidly but that he was confident she would make an excellent recovery and it was not a metastatic tumour. I saw other dogs who had had the same surgery and he gave me some scientific journals with articles about similar cases. We went ahead with trepidation. She recovered in 2 days and was eating chicken feet in 3 days (stolen off our other dog !). She never seemed in the least upset or distressed by any of it. She lived another 2 healthy years and I lost her to dementia.
I am grateful to them for the happy healthy little dog I had for many years.
My neighbours dog had spinal cord injury and had emergency surgery there. His paralysis completely resolved and he also led a long happy life.
So sometimes they do brilliant stuff there. I am sure he is difficult to work with as he is so particular and always seems a bit "spectrumy" to me. But he is passionate and has made many groundbreaking surgeries become routine over the years.
 

Moobli

Well-Known Member
Joined
13 June 2013
Messages
6,078
Location
Scotland
Visit site
I watched him in the early days and was often amazed at his skill and ingenuity. The case of Dandi the GSD pup had me in tears and still upsets me to think about it. But over the years his touchy feely, gushing way with clients just turned me right off. And some of the experimental surgeries seem more about his ego than for the good of the animal. He’s no doubt brilliant at what he does but I think he’d be super hard to live with.
 

Rowreach

Adjusting my sails
Joined
13 May 2007
Messages
17,853
Location
Northern Ireland
Visit site
It’s interesting because the cohort he went through vet school with had him down as the least likely to finish the course. And are now wryly comparing their respective bank balances.

Someone recently told me that what the Supervet and others do is great because the discoveries can be transferred to human medicine - which bothered me even more.

Extreme veterinary intervention is always questionable imo for the simple reason that the animal has no choice and no concept as to why something is being done to it. And I do feel that too many animal owners are more concerned about their own sensibilities than the overall welfare of the pet.
 

TPO

🤠🏴󠁧󠁢󠁳󠁣󠁴󠁿
Joined
20 November 2008
Messages
10,003
Location
Kinross
Visit site
I do feel that too many animal owners are more concerned about their own sensibilities than the overall welfare of the pet.

This 100x over. So many animals are kept going simply because the owner can't, or won't, face up to making the decision. To then have vets like him on TV/everywhere encouraging people to keep trying even in extreme scenarios does nothing to help animals with owners like this
 

Morwenna

Well-Known Member
Joined
1 May 2022
Messages
464
Visit site
I would never take a dog to him based on what I’ve seen and heard from people who have worked with him. I’m also in the “just because you can do something doesn’t mean you should” school. The work he does is incredible from a scientific / technical point of view but the recovery process for some of these animals is horrific and I wonder about the long-term effects (sister’s old dog had a common surgery as a young dog and the crate rest after just blew his brain, even though he was happy in his crate before). It does seem that the owners wishes carry more weight than what is best for the animal and that it gives him a chance to experiment / push the boundaries further. I know this is how veterinary medicine (and medicine) move on but I’ve never seen any conversations about the quality of the animals life after.
 
Top