Thank goodness for insurance

Clodagh

Well-Known Member
Joined
17 August 2005
Messages
26,651
Location
Devon
Visit site
Oh well the “great” and the “good” of AAD have spoken Parrotperson, henceforth we must only post where they deem appropriate! Remember this at all times, and heaven help that a post digresses in the way that they have since the forum ever existed..... ?

Please put your personal dislike of me to one side and try to think about SB.
 

Parrotperson

Well-Known Member
Joined
21 July 2016
Messages
2,050
Visit site
my fault. I was just glad to see let posting again. Apologies. and lets all try to be friendly shall we? calling people spiteful is dreadful nd not necessary at all.
 

satinbaze

Well-Known Member
Joined
29 May 2012
Messages
1,186
Visit site
Tiva is slowly feeling better and has been very settled today, the pain killers are defiantly working. She is eating well and was much more comfortable having a poo. The biopsy results take up to 2 weeks to come back and she has a 30% chance the mass is benign. The surgeon said there were no further areas of concern on visual inspection so we are hoping and preying for the positive outcome. We are back to my vet on Wednesday for a wound check, sutures are dissolvable so no need to be removed.
Thank you all for the positive vibes for Tiva and her recovery.
 

TPO

🤠🏴󠁧󠁢󠁳󠁣󠁴󠁿
Joined
20 November 2008
Messages
10,003
Location
Kinross
Visit site
I'm glad Tiva is starting to feel better and I wish her a speedy recovery.

I hope that the next 2wks go past quickly and that you get good news.

Take care
 

Landcruiser

Well-Known Member
Joined
13 May 2011
Messages
3,203
Location
Wiltshire
Visit site
maybe so - however I’m fully aware of how much treatment can cost, I would hope that any responsible dog owner is the same? If you aren’t, then you should consider whether it is appropriate for you to have a dog because you really aren’t thinking things through.....
Blimey. Well done...but lots of people are not as responsible and present at the vets with no means of payment for treatment..or don't present, and animals are left to suffer. I think that was all OP was alluding to.

Edited to add - I posted the above before reading the whole thread.
 
Last edited:

Landcruiser

Well-Known Member
Joined
13 May 2011
Messages
3,203
Location
Wiltshire
Visit site
Based on my experience, I think that vets in GB charge *much* more when an insurance company is paying than when an uninsured owner is footing the bill. I have known my vets a long time and I have never had reduced care from them. The only difference between my experience with the late lamented Rottweiler's tumour and OP's experience is that we had stipulated that we would not be going down the chemo route, if the tumour was operable. Vet agreed that she wouldn't want to do that either. Otherwise we had been quoted less than £2k, including aftercare for what OP's ins.co was charged over x4 for.
.
When the insurance is paying, for most people that means there are much greater options for treatment and more treatment is often able to be offered/done. The actual prices won't change - they are fixed by the practice and it would be illegal to change them to charge more for anything. A vet would be struck off for doing that
 

ycbm

Einstein would be proud of my Insanity...
Joined
30 January 2015
Messages
58,797
Visit site
When the insurance is paying, for most people that means there are much greater options for treatment and more treatment is often able to be offered/done. The actual prices won't change - they are fixed by the practice and it would be illegal to change them to charge more for anything. A vet would be struck off for doing that


I think what PaS has experienced is what I have experienced. I never tell my vet I can't afford diagnostics or treatment. There are no greater treatment options available to an insured person than there are to me. But when they are made aware that I am not insured, they sometimes decide we can do without expensive diagnostics that they would advise if the horse was insured. They will, for example, happily inject suspected arthritic hocks without x rays. And they always discuss with me what diagnostics they will run, they don't tell me what will be run, which I see happening with insured friends. There is also a treatment option offered to uninsured people which seems to be rarely offered to someone insured - time.

I know of a friend who lives near one of the practice vets that she uses and that vet often does work for her without charging parts of it, like the visit fee, which would never normally be left off an insured bill.

I have experienced a vet telling me that if I had told them I wasn't insured, I could have brought reusable bandages to the hospital instead of paying £80 a time in dressings for daily bandage changes.

I also know of vets (not mine!) who will do cash-only treatment off the books at the clients risk. No comeback if anything goes wrong. The charge for that is way lower than through the books. But I've only heard of that in the rural areas in the north of the country. I don't even know if that is legal, but it happens.
.
 
Last edited:

Christmascinnamoncookie

Fais pas chier!
Joined
6 July 2010
Messages
36,335
Visit site
I hate the wait for results. I hope it comes back quickly and is benign.
Re insurance, I couldn’t agree more! My warmblood maxed out his insurance, I was extremely glad I’d insured him.
 
  • Like
Reactions: TPO

milliepops

Wears headscarf aggressively
Joined
26 July 2008
Messages
27,536
Visit site
I think what PaS has experienced is what I have experienced. I never tell my vet I can't afford diagnostics or treatment. There are no greater treatment options available to an insured person than there are to me. But when they are made aware that I am not insured, they sometimes decide we can do without expensive diagnostics that they would advise if the horse was insured. They will, for example, happily inject suspected arthritic hocks without x rays. And they always discuss with me what diagnostics they will run, they don't tell me what will be run, which I see happening with insured friends. There is also a treatment option offered to uninsured people which seems to be rarely offered to someone insured - time.

I know of a friend who lives near one of the practice vets that she uses and that vet often does work for her without charging parts of it, like the visit fee, which would never normally be left off an insured bill.

I have experienced a vet telling me that if I had told them I wasn't insured, I could have brought reusable bandages to the hospital instead of paying £80 a time in dressings for daily bandage changes.


.
Some of this may be down to insurance company requirements rather than vets bumping up the bill to line their pockets. I just had a horse scoped when we possibly could have just treated, as the insurers require a scope in order to pay, and also a follow up later on.
I dont have an issue with this as clinically its the best practice but if I hadn't been insured I might have swerved the trip to horspital and just cracked on.

(As an insured client I've provided & done my own dressings on vet suggestion, left more in the pot for follow ups)
 

Rowreach

Adjusting my sails
Joined
13 May 2007
Messages
17,854
Location
Northern Ireland
Visit site
I was about to say the same, insurance won't pay out for speculative treatment without diagnostics to demonstrate that it is needed.

Yup, the last horse I had that needed surgery and a hospital stay was diagnosed using xrays and the vet's expertise - he said he could refer him for a CT scan but that wouldn't alter the treatment he needed, so I went straight for the surgery (and saved a lot of money). If he'd been insured he would have had to have gone for the CT in order to cover the bases required by the insurance company.
 

milliepops

Wears headscarf aggressively
Joined
26 July 2008
Messages
27,536
Visit site
From the pov of educating myself as an owner I really find the diagnostics valuable and have been very pleased to have them, vets have always talked me through the images etc and the sort of person I am, I get a lot of reassurance from the extra info. If money were no object ( ;) ) I'd do them as a self funded client.
 

Tiddlypom

Carries on creakily
Joined
17 July 2013
Messages
23,894
Location
In between the Midlands and the North
Visit site
I just had a horse scoped when we possibly could have just treated, as the insurers require a scope in order to pay, and also a follow up
My equine vet is very helpful and is always looking to find ways to keep my bills down - I self insure.

We were both convinced that one of mine had foregut ulcers, and I did ask whether it was worth scoping or whether to go straight to treatment. No, she said we needed to be sure and it turned out the mare scoped clear, which surprised us both.

It was hind gut ulcers instead.
 
Top