{97702}
...
You are so bloody spiteful
so block me, I couldn’t care less
Incidentally that’s sarcasm not spite - absence of malice, I simply find it amusing to be told when & where I should post
Last edited:
You are so bloody spiteful
Oh well the “great” and the “good” of AAD have spoken Parrotperson, henceforth we must only post where they deem appropriate! Remember this at all times, and heaven help that a post digresses in the way that they have since the forum ever existed..... ?
Please put your personal dislike of me to one side and try to think about SB.
You are so bloody spiteful
who is?
I'm sure I didn't mean to cause a row. The news when last heard about Tiva was better. and I remain very hopeful shell recover well.
Its a real shame that the Op has had her thread overtaken, Hope Tiva is improving.
who is?
I'm sure I didn't mean to cause a row. The news when last heard about Tiva was better. and I remain very hopeful shell recover well.
Blimey. Well done...but lots of people are not as responsible and present at the vets with no means of payment for treatment..or don't present, and animals are left to suffer. I think that was all OP was alluding to.maybe so - however I’m fully aware of how much treatment can cost, I would hope that any responsible dog owner is the same? If you aren’t, then you should consider whether it is appropriate for you to have a dog because you really aren’t thinking things through.....
When the insurance is paying, for most people that means there are much greater options for treatment and more treatment is often able to be offered/done. The actual prices won't change - they are fixed by the practice and it would be illegal to change them to charge more for anything. A vet would be struck off for doing thatBased on my experience, I think that vets in GB charge *much* more when an insurance company is paying than when an uninsured owner is footing the bill. I have known my vets a long time and I have never had reduced care from them. The only difference between my experience with the late lamented Rottweiler's tumour and OP's experience is that we had stipulated that we would not be going down the chemo route, if the tumour was operable. Vet agreed that she wouldn't want to do that either. Otherwise we had been quoted less than £2k, including aftercare for what OP's ins.co was charged over x4 for.
.
When the insurance is paying, for most people that means there are much greater options for treatment and more treatment is often able to be offered/done. The actual prices won't change - they are fixed by the practice and it would be illegal to change them to charge more for anything. A vet would be struck off for doing that
Some of this may be down to insurance company requirements rather than vets bumping up the bill to line their pockets. I just had a horse scoped when we possibly could have just treated, as the insurers require a scope in order to pay, and also a follow up later on.I think what PaS has experienced is what I have experienced. I never tell my vet I can't afford diagnostics or treatment. There are no greater treatment options available to an insured person than there are to me. But when they are made aware that I am not insured, they sometimes decide we can do without expensive diagnostics that they would advise if the horse was insured. They will, for example, happily inject suspected arthritic hocks without x rays. And they always discuss with me what diagnostics they will run, they don't tell me what will be run, which I see happening with insured friends. There is also a treatment option offered to uninsured people which seems to be rarely offered to someone insured - time.
I know of a friend who lives near one of the practice vets that she uses and that vet often does work for her without charging parts of it, like the visit fee, which would never normally be left off an insured bill.
I have experienced a vet telling me that if I had told them I wasn't insured, I could have brought reusable bandages to the hospital instead of paying £80 a time in dressings for daily bandage changes.
.
I was about to say the same, insurance won't pay out for speculative treatment without diagnostics to demonstrate that it is needed.
My equine vet is very helpful and is always looking to find ways to keep my bills down - I self insure.I just had a horse scoped when we possibly could have just treated, as the insurers require a scope in order to pay, and also a follow up