cauda equina
Well-Known Member
'I am sorry that it has reached this point'
I bet she is, sorry she's been rumbled!
I bet she is, sorry she's been rumbled!
Apologies if this question has already been asked.
Are all of the dodgy dealer FB sites now known to be dodgy themselves - with the admins concealing or actively complicit in dodgy activity from the favoured few?
Hard to argue otherwise, isn’t it?Apologies if this question has already been asked.
Are all of the dodgy dealer FB sites now known to be dodgy themselves - with the admins concealing or actively complicit in dodgy activity from the favoured few?
Bankruptcy doesn't happen instantly I'd suspect she will of withdrawn a large amount of money never to be seen again.It’s quite addictive to read all the comments. The posts just keep rolling in. And it’s big sums of money. 13k. 10k. All still owed. It’s awful. Netflix need to make a documentary about the woman.
Almost £500,000 nowIf it the one I had to get the police involved with then I cant think of anyone who deserves it more. I was not the only one involved in that case either!
One of the mods on the group shared here has added up theres over 120,000 outstanding that they know of![]()
![]()
I sent one back with 7 undisclosed sarcoids which she denied existed except I found out from a previous owner they definitely didI nearly enquired about one when i was looking sounded perfect can't remember why, but I clearly didn't investigate hard at the time. I had no idea until this that the horse was at a dealer let alone this one the ad sounded like a private home. From the FB the pony I liked was apparently covered in sarcoids!
In theory it is tho.. if a horse is being moved about it's still available.It’s fraud, which potentially carries a jail sentence. Not just a civil matter. As others have said, she is selling something that isn’t available for sale.
I don’t think you are correct here. The sales agreement with her is that the horse is sold l, full amount paid and therefore is the possession of the owner, on the agreement that it can be returned if not suitable. I bought horses from her several years ago (both of which I kept) and this was definitely the agreement.In theory it is tho.. if a horse is being moved about it's still available.
I'm not debating fraud, but this woman isn't stupid all the loop holes covered.
It would be interesting if one of her trial agreements was put in front of a solicitor, but I suspect it's not legally binding in any way.
She's basically selling horses on loan to her. Loan to sell IE sales livery I think she knows all of this and knows a lot of it will be classed as civil law. She's a dealer...who else are her contacts? These people know their bubble will burst at some point.
And are 10 steps ahead.
I really hope those with horses on sales livery get their horses back and the ones left in the yard...well I suspect there already at another dealers being moved on. Awful woman that really deserves never to be able set foot in public again.
But if the horse was on sale livery she didn't own it did she.I don’t think you are correct here. The sales agreement with her is that the horse is sold l, full amount paid and therefore is the possession of the owner, on the agreement that it can be returned if not suitable. I bought horses from her several years ago (both of which I kept) and this was definitely the agreement.
This is absolutely not a loan situation.
Up until this point I was prepared to think that she's not all bad, that the lure of £ made her fall into the merry-go-round of mis-selling and refunding. This absolutely proves her real character.She's told one person who has been looking for his horse sent on sales livery that the horse will be euthanised tomorrow, what a truely disgusting individual.
I think it's apparently got an injury.Up until this point I was prepared to think that she's not all bad, that the lure of £ made her fall into the merry-go-round of mis-selling and refunding. This absolutely proves her real character.
But if the horse was on sale livery she didn't own it did she.
So putting it on trial was a "loan"
The horse is sold when the OWNER has the money and legal ownership has been transferred.
Which if this woman was doing correctly ownership would of been transferred at point of person paying the money. And a receipt provided.
From what I've read this never happened.
You're still entitled to get your own horse back from sales livery to have it examined and treated by your own vet rather than getting a ultimatum from the dealer that it will be euthanised. Especially in the case that the injury has occurred at the point where the horse is no longer able to be "sold" to any more customers on the trial scheme as your business practices have been exposed on social media and you have stated that you have filed for bankrupcy.I think it's apparently got an injury.