Tokyo Showjumping thread

m1stify

Well-Known Member
Joined
30 March 2011
Messages
637
Visit site
I can’t imagine he wouldn’t have noticed his horse paddling through several fences and sending poles scattering everywhere.

This is “my” team ?? and I’m disgusted he didn’t retire. Who cares if it’s the Olympics?

Crikey it used to be the pure dressage I couldn’t bear to watch, but the SJ so far has been awful.

We all have so much sympathy for athletes who put their mental health first, and seemingly feck all compassion for these horses.

My team also! Yes he should have retired. I just thought maybe as I am not a top showjumper to try to understand why not, giving him the benefit of the doubt.

I don't like this 3 on a team rule - I think if they could drop his score he would have retired. But I agree he should have.
Maybe would be less pressure on the riders if they still had the old format.
 

Nicnac

Well-Known Member
Joined
9 May 2007
Messages
8,067
Visit site
Crikey - managed to catch Holly's round between meetings and then just logged back on to see the bloke have a crashing fall. Looked like he was knocked out. The Argentinian was pretty disastrous too.

Interesting that the Eventing isn't 5* level to take into account less experienced nations but show jumping doesn't seem to do the same. The track looks as big as any top level ones I've seen.
 

Kat

Well-Known Member
Joined
25 January 2008
Messages
13,061
Location
Derbyshire
Visit site
Interesting comparison with the eventing where the course has been downgraded for the benefit of smaller nations, I wonder whether the same needs to happen for SJ too.

This course isn't up to height according to John Kyle. :-(

I guess it is a balance between having a course tough enough to weed out enough before the second round but easy enough that there aren't accidents.

Poles falling and time faults is what we want. Stops and run outs not too bad but horses falling or landing in the jumps is really uncomfortable and shouldn't be happening this frequently.
 

Bellaboo18

Well-Known Member
Joined
3 October 2018
Messages
2,159
Visit site
Two horses on the floor, numerous horses looking like they are struggling physically and mentally with the questions asked?

And this is enjoyable?

Sorry, I was replying to pure showjumping isn't enjoyable to watch. This wont put me off watching sj the rest of the time.

I as everyone else hate watching the horse and rider combinations which clearly shouldn't be attempting this course. Questions hopefully will asked about qualification or the course etc.
 

humblepie

Well-Known Member
Joined
5 February 2008
Messages
6,609
Visit site
It looks a question a bit too big for some of the horses/combinations. On the whole I am not finding issues with the riding as such - it is mistakes due to the course or the time which is obviously very tight.
 

Kat

Well-Known Member
Joined
25 January 2008
Messages
13,061
Location
Derbyshire
Visit site
My team also! Yes he should have retired. I just thought maybe as I am not a top showjumper to try to understand why not, giving him the benefit of the doubt.

I don't like this 3 on a team rule - I think if they could drop his score he would have retired. But I agree he should have.
Maybe would be less pressure on the riders if they still had the old format.
I agree I think the 3 riders no drop score format puts so much pressure on that it would be very tough to retire.

I think the SJ format needs some work, there has to be a way of allowing nations to compete without horses falling all over the place. I'm not sure that multiple rounds of straightforward show jumping is particularly viewer friendly either. I wonder if having a speed class and something like a puissance or six bar as part of the team competition would appeal. Maybe they have each member of the team do a different class and then decide it based upon overall performance. It would be much more interesting for less horsey viewers.
 

Squeak

Well-Known Member
Joined
6 April 2009
Messages
3,755
Visit site
I only just started watching before the Israeli rider and have to admit it's not making nice watching so far.

Agree that the 3 riders with no drop score is possibly putting pressure on riders to complete where they wouldn't have previously. Was it a mexican in the xc who kept trying to complete even though their horse was too tired to even canter?
 

humblepie

Well-Known Member
Joined
5 February 2008
Messages
6,609
Visit site
They used to have a speed element as the first round I am sure. I wonder if the 30 clears from the first competition made the course builder think he needed to up it? Be interesting to see whether the horses that did the teams jump better because they have their eye in or not so well because of those efforts.
 
  • Like
Reactions: Kat

Kat

Well-Known Member
Joined
25 January 2008
Messages
13,061
Location
Derbyshire
Visit site
I only just started watching before the Israeli rider and have to admit it's not making nice watching so far.

Agree that the 3 riders with no drop score is possibly putting pressure on riders to complete where they wouldn't have previously. Was it a mexican in the xc who kept trying to complete even though their horse was too tired to even canter?
Brazilian, and he did withdraw, but probably should have withdrawn a couple of fences earlier. Again the pressure when there is no drop score and in his case he was in sight of home must make it very difficult to retire.
 

Bradsmum

Well-Known Member
Joined
2 May 2011
Messages
1,688
Location
Made it to Wales
Visit site
That last Egyptian round wasn't hanging around and yet still got time penalty so perhaps it's a combination of no discount score, big/technical course and tight time that's just putting too much pressure on riders and horses and we are not getting an enjoyable event.
 

Kat

Well-Known Member
Joined
25 January 2008
Messages
13,061
Location
Derbyshire
Visit site
Even the stops and runouts are worrying because they are unusual at this level and suggest a real breakdown in confidence. Taking a pole out with a toe is a long way from a horse finding itself in mid air unable to make a spread and paddling through several poles.

If that was in response to my comment, I agree that run outs and refusals at this level aren't good. Perhaps my wording was at fault, I meant that they aren't as worrying as horse falls and you might expect to see one or two on a tricky distance or approach and that wouldn't give you too much cause for concern about a course, but this is causing more than that.

I agree that the horses paddling in the air and landing on the jumps is very different to knocking a pole and it is worrying how many are demolishing the fences.

Two horse falls already is VERY worrying indeed, they were both pretty crashing ones too.

Course designers aim for a certain % clear rate to ensure that it is competitive but the faults should be a top rail tipped off, a foot in the water, or time faults in by far the majority of cases. Horses looking like they have lost their bottle or jacked it in isn't good viewing, and is a world away from a horse glancing off a tight angle for a run out.
 

Kadastorm

Well-Known Member
Joined
17 February 2011
Messages
1,738
Visit site
What was the reason for not having a drop score this time? Because of covid or something else? I hope they change it back because it really isnt working this time and its seen 2 horses fall where they probably would have been retired.

The Israeli guys fall was particularly horrid and the amount of horses refusing and poles crashing at this level isnt right. A huge triple bar coming into a treble!?

This and the modern pentathlon showjumping has just made me sad for horse welfare today.
 

Kat

Well-Known Member
Joined
25 January 2008
Messages
13,061
Location
Derbyshire
Visit site
What was the reason for not having a drop score this time? Because of covid or something else? I hope they change it back because it really isnt working this time and its seen 2 horses fall where they probably would have been retired.

The Israeli guys fall was particularly horrid and the amount of horses refusing and poles crashing at this level isnt right. A huge triple bar coming into a treble!?

This and the modern pentathlon showjumping has just made me sad for horse welfare today.

The reason was apparently to make it easier for smaller nations to be competitive and to make the equestrian events quicker to get through.

I agree that it isn't really working in eventing and showjumping due to the pressure to complete.
 

Rowreach

👀
Joined
13 May 2007
Messages
17,155
Location
Northern Ireland
Visit site
If that was in response to my comment, I agree that run outs and refusals at this level aren't good. Perhaps my wording was at fault, I meant that they aren't as worrying as horse falls and you might expect to see one or two on a tricky distance or approach and that wouldn't give you too much cause for concern about a course, but this is causing more than that.

I agree that the horses paddling in the air and landing on the jumps is very different to knocking a pole and it is worrying how many are demolishing the fences.

Two horse falls already is VERY worrying indeed, they were both pretty crashing ones too.

Course designers aim for a certain % clear rate to ensure that it is competitive but the faults should be a top rail tipped off, a foot in the water, or time faults in by far the majority of cases. Horses looking like they have lost their bottle or jacked it in isn't good viewing, and is a world away from a horse glancing off a tight angle for a run out.

Agree with all of that, I was really replying generally.

I also think that as a team qualifying event, you need to be getting teams through to the next round. At this rate they’re not going to even get the requisite numbers through, with teams now pulling out.
 
Top