scats
Well-Known Member
I think maybe you're out of date? You learned in the days when the UK didn't have a hope in hell of winning an Olympic title, I guess.
I think you've also missed the word 'not' and changed the while sense of what you are saying. But if we follow that argument, you are saying that no horse should be trotting a ten metre circle until it is capable of carrying the rider in assuring grit. Which to me, is plainly ridiculous.
This. Tnavas, I am not denying your classical background and this is quite obviously the way you have been taught (as perhaps the instructor that I had in the 80s), but things have moved on and surely the mark of a good horseman is one who can adapt and change to suit the animal they are riding to achieve the best results, not one who is so rigid in their thinking that they must ride everything the same because that's what you do. This change is why we are now a force to be reckoned with in dressage, rather than a nation who could never quite make it.
As Cortez has said, there are numerous uses for riding on the 'wrong' diagonal also, and I solved a canter transition issue with current mare via this exact method.
Dressage has moved on, you don't have to sit for 10 m circles anymore, and rising is allowed in lower level tests, because it has been recognzied that some horses working at that level may still not be strong enough to do the whole test with the rider sitting. Dressage has become more accessible, which can only be a good thing, surely.
I am not knocking classical methods and indeed I have trained with some well known classical riders, but I won't name drop as that's not my thing. But being completely aghast that people now rise while riding a ten meter circle was quite amusing to me.
It's a bit like being shocked that people no longer wear chin cups on their hats.