marieshorses
Well-Known Member
It would be interesting to know the incidence in a wild unridden population such as mustangs.
100% agreed! Also, collecting data on foals/younger horse--especially within bloodlines, etc.
It would be interesting to know the incidence in a wild unridden population such as mustangs.
Children are examined at very young ages for scoliosis. We should have the same in foal/younger horses to understand the development of the back, etc...
I struggle to believe that 80% of all horses have KS, I do also think its a fashionable diagnosis, but thats not to say that more horses have it, than are diagnosed with it.
Personally, I have had spinal xrays done on two dressage horses as part of a pre purchase exam. One was a just backed 5yr old, she is now a fit happy (unmedicated) 15yr old horse competing at GP, her back has never given me a seconds concern. The other one was a just backed 4yr old, she is now 6, and has also, so far, given me no cause for concern. Both had totally healthy clear xrays, that were viewed by two different vet practises.
ETA: Neither horse has ever worn a pessoa!
It is quite common for spine x-rays to be requested when purchasing valuable competition horses, so it would be quite interesting to see the stats from this group as they are done as a routine precaution rather than because the horse is showing symptoms.
Similar to medicine in humans, pathology is usually generated collectively through mostly "sick" or degenerating health. I'm curious in equine science how many of the back x-ray's are compiled through age groups--like the younger horse-- versus post mortem. Since technology is more portable, thus making x-ray's cheaper, are there any large animal veterinary programs that have collected data on younger horses? Children go through scoliosis examinations at very young ages...
Most scoliosis develops in puberty so checking at young age is relatively pointless... interested to know however who you think does this at a young age?
In which case I suggest you stop asking for 'opinions' including those from vets and start with a pubmed search
Most scoliosis develops in puberty so checking at young age is relatively pointless... interested to know however who you think does this at a young age?
Well, I thought coming to a social group would form a hypothesis before diving into the data.
What's interesting about this area of equine science is the actual definition of kissing spine as it relates to each horse individually. I would think the entire sport would benefit substantially if we discussed these compressed vertebrae from foal to younger horse by a large pool of x-ray's.
How many vertebrae are "kissing" on your horse? I assume the diagnosis was done through x-rays?
Why do you keep calling kissing spines 'compressed vertebrae'? I've never seen this description, myself. Kissing spines is usually, I think, clashing of the dorsal spinal processes. This can, in time, lead to damage to the actual body of the vertebra, but it doesn't start there afaik? Which is why it can be resolved in many cases without surgery, that there is no intrinsic conformation fault. Unlike my horse, who was born with very tightly packed vertebrae.
The surgeon who operated on mine said he generally operates at three ages. 3-4, these horses are born with it. 7-8, these horses are either stoic animals who were born with it and reach a point where they can no longer tolerate it, or it has been caused by training incorrectly. 12, these are horses where work has taken its toll.
Two. The diagnosis was done through xray too. Although the first vet didn't think it was kissing spine as they weren't touching in the xray with the portable machine, but once the consultant saw those he said it was and better xrays were taken to confirm he was right.
Interesting... So was the lameness determined to be caused by the compressed vertebrae? Did you x-ray? If yes, how many of the vertebrae were touching?
How old was your horse when x-ray'd/diagnosed?
How can we hypothesize about why 80% of horses have kissing spine without any evidence that 80% of horses, have kissing spine?
Yes we did x-ray and found, I think it was two years ago, four/five touching/fused but until the rh lameness never had a worry out of him.
He reacted a bit over his back but he always had physio very six months but bucked and kicked out when over the sacro so that was the more painful area.
We injected both areas and for six weeks he was sound then it wore off. I honestly think it was the sacro causing 90% of his pain and all his lameness. He was an exracer so from a young age he had more pressure put on that area when in starting stalls. He did 81 races from 2 till 8 so he did well.
My warmblood had five processes completely fused under saddle and a further four touching at age 13. She had been little backed at 7 and then had a blank few hers were I don't know her history till we got her at 10 and she never was able to cope with ridden work. No other lameness at all until she was pts last year with stifle arthritis aged 16.
What I'd like to know is if there are any good studies anyone here could send on young equines that are x-ray'd from a preventative/pre-purchase examination and where to find that data.
Interesting--thank you for sharing. Although my. background is mostly in human studies, horses are my greatest pastime. I get somewhat frustrated when hearing "trainers" focus on the lameness in limbs versus the potential culprit from spinal indifferences either "born with" or due to training methods. In human research, back issues are now being investigated from a viral origin.
It is unlikely that anyone on here has conducted any meaningful study! I mean there are a fair few scientists and doctorates hanging around but that is quite a niche request.
I use the term 'compressed vertebrae' because of the training implications that could essentially cause the compression. I'm trying my best to compile data--mostly from human studies--involving younger athletes and the spine. What I'd like to know is if there are any good studies anyone here could send on young equines that are x-ray'd from a preventative/pre-purchase examination and where to find that data.
We have numerous studies available like this one to understand vertebrae compression due to training vulnerabilities in young athletes: https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3445254/
Not sure I've ever heard of viruses causing bone problems in the back for people. Where does this come from?
Interesting--thank you for sharing. Although my background is mostly in human studies, horses are my greatest pastime. I get somewhat frustrated when hearing "trainers" focus on the lameness in limbs versus the potential culprit from spinal indifferences either "born with" or due to training methods. In human research, back issues are now being investigated from a viral origin.
Really fascinating data that's emerging in our virome. Here's a fascinating read largely based on a Danish study from a few years ago. https://www.theguardian.com/society/2013/may/07/antibiotics-cure-back-pain-patients
That's bacteria, not viruses. Viruses can't be cured with antibiotics, they don't work that way sadly. They mutate too much.
Hello Community:
I recently heard that over 80% of horses have at least one vertebrae that is close and/or kissing the other.
I've also heard there is no such thing as a completely healthy back and spine.
My question is how do you feel about the data gathered from radiography of neck and spine? What type of horses are usually x-ray'd?
Any other information you can share about cervical spine and back findings would be appreciated, especially as it relates to dressage horses.
Thanks!
Marie