Lady La La
Well-Known Member
Except, you didn't...
Why do you think the farrier would have reshod the horse, if it were not required? For fun? To earn an extra few quid?
Does nobody have any trust or respect for their farriers any more?![]()
Isn't that just like asking 'why do so many barefoot trimmers refuse to recommend shoes for a horse that clearly needs them' ...?
I trust my farrier completely, and should he ever decide that my horse needs shoes (which, to this day he never has) then shoes he shall have...
Except, you didn't...
... other than those heavily laden with bias & prejudice, which sadly goes for most of what CPT posts
Oh & likewise CPT in regards to what you *think* you read. No nastiness will ever come from me.
I must confess, it was pure sarcasm
What did your horse say? His opinion is far more important than the farrier's. If he was sound he didn't need the shoes.
If I might slightly gate crash this thread (apologies OP but just a brief Q whilst the BF experts are here) - when you say add copper.....that is the one thing I dont think I have added to my horse's diet (it could explain a few things!).....how much and in what form is this supplemented please?
I can't quote, but I see no reference in those posts to many of the things that you raised initially to prove my 'bias'![]()
CPT, do you actually want me to do that? Last time you told me to provide proof of something you had said, you threatened to sue me![]()
I'd be happy to do so though, if required...![]()
Hho Hho Hho are you this unpleasant and deliberately objectionable and antagonistic IRL? Just curious tis all?![]()
I'm confused as to where my bias is, exactly?
I keep my horses without shoes, and I appreciate all barefoot advice this forum offers... other than those heavily laden with bias & prejudice, which sadly goes for most of what CPT posts
Oh & likewise CPT in regards to what you *think* you read. No nastiness will ever come from me.
Have another smiley![]()
Hho Hho Hho are you this unpleasant and deliberately objectionable and antagonistic IRL? Just curious tis all?![]()
Well that's no surprise but I fail to see why you think a smiley is appropriate when all you intended was nastiness.
You have a barefoot horse. Almost by definition that means you have an open minded and good farrier. Not everyone is so lucky. Some people's horses would be dead or paddock ornaments by now if they had trusted their farriers."
Genuine question here, you say Hho Hho has a barefoot horse. I have 2 ponies and a donkey here, none have shoes on. One pony (aged 20) and the donkey (mid 30s) have never been shod, the other pony (24) has not had shoes on for around 5 years. They are all trimmed by my farrier who previously shod the one pony and stills shoes the horse. To me my gang are just plain unshod, not barefoot, as I had unshod ponies way before I ever heard of barefoot. So is there a difference, or can I give them a more fancy name now.
What did your horse say? His opinion is far more important than the farrier's. If he was sound he didn't need the shoes.
Hho Hho Hho are you this unpleasant and deliberately objectionable and antagonistic IRL? Just curious tis all?![]()
Well mine would say "please just leave the feedroom door open, with the lids off all the feed bins, if you please"
Doesn't mean it would be good for him!
FWIW I recently asked a barefoot taliban here for some advice. I asked them and am seeing results, but the ultimate aim is to have feet good enough to keep a set of shoes on!
I don't think HHH was being particularly unpleasant, she was questioning something that she did not agree with, only to be jumped on by those who worship at the feet of self proclaimed experts.