ycbm
Einstein would be proud of my Insanity...
I did realise that, but she seems to think that she can get around it by approaching it from the position that the other people are 'sharers'. Someone in the village rang the council about it but they weren't interested when they found out she only has 4 horses (I don't know how the person phrased it to the council, or who they spoke to). It's just made me wonder with all the posts about at the moment with people trying to get paid sharers for multiple horses how many of them are pushing the legal boundaries too far.
I've seen a few cases recently where the amount being asked for is far more than the horse can cost to keep, so if the owner is making a regular profit then surely it is a business of sorts? Particularly when they have several sharers for one horse, all of whom are paying.
I know horses are an expensive hobby, but there seems to be more and more people who expect to be able to get someone else to fund their hobby. 5-10 years ago it seemed as though owners more felt that the sharer was helping them out, whereas nowadays a lot of them seem to think that they are doing the sharer a favour, and should be paid handsomely for it.
They should try reporting them for tax evasion on their income instead, if will probably get a lot more interest from HMRC than the overstretched Council.
The RSPCA wasn't able to prosecute over the horse someone starved after I sold him to her. When I discovered the riding school she was running was declared as not operating on the tax records, I reported that instead and the business closed soon after, not before time as she had a string of complaints about the place and what she was doing.
.