Equimins vitamin e

paddy555

Well-Known Member
Joined
23 December 2010
Messages
13,679
Visit site
If someone was doing everything else right, rugs exercise, and feeding the horse a 10000iU dose of Equimins oil but the horse was still symptomatic and suffering... if the oil was believed to be natural vitamin E it might be that that horse got written off or even PTS. Where 10000iU of actually natural vitamin E might have tipped the balance and eased the horse's symptoms.

I was so so confused when mine tied up on 8000iU. But knowing she was only on 4000iU really makes a lot more sense. I slipped up on rugging too but maybe with 8000iU of natural vitamin E my rugging slip up might not have mattered and she might have been spared the tye up.

did your vet test your horse for vit e levels? that would have been a good place to start to see if she was absorbing the vit e and if in fact you had a deficiency.
 

COldNag

Wasting my time successfully....
Joined
23 July 2011
Messages
11,643
Location
Somewhere south of the middle
Visit site
It’s all a matter of principle. Mislabelling and misleading customers about what they feed their horses is incredibly dangerous, and morally wrong.
My pony looks great on AC powder and their vitamin e oil. But I’m still not going to give them any more of my money, knowing that they have been covering up their mistake for years now. I’m lucky, my pony just gets vitamin e because he’s on almost no grass and has Cushings, so it was advised. It’s a supplement, not a health essential. But others clearly haven’t been so lucky, and it’s unacceptable.

Same here i switched from Progressive Earth to Equimins because it was quicker/cheaper delivery.

On point of principle I am going back to PE.
 

PapaverFollis

Well-Known Member
Joined
13 November 2012
Messages
9,560
Visit site
How many of your horses do you test for vitamin E levels, paddy? How many of them when you are already feeding 8000iU of what you think is natural vitamin E? I have posted about this horse numerous times on here, I have read many threads on PSSM. I've been advised to test for PSSM but never to check vitamin E levels. In fact I've seen it said that checking vitamin E levels in blood does not always show up a deficiency anyway. I've been in contact with my vet throughout who has never even wanted to do a blood test or been bothered about the genetic test.

The horse is needle phobic and large, so the vet and I need a bloody good reason to stick her. Testing a horse supposedly being fed 8000iU of natural vitamin E a day for vitamin E deficiency is not a good reason. I put the tye up down to other reasons. Started feeding Alcar and was even more careful about rugging and work increases, boosted the vitamin E back up to 10,000iU.

Currently feeding 6000iU of ForagePlus powder and have better movement then I ever saw on even 10000iU of the Equimins. Now I know why.
 

Safi2

Member
Joined
24 January 2020
Messages
20
Visit site
I am thinking I should be trying the forage plus powder after reading comments from here about equimins oil and the RER Facebook pages. I need to be supplementing 2500ui per day. Would I work out cheaper using forage plus or nano-e? I have enough Dura-e from my prescription to last around a week so need to order an alternative as soon as possible. Thank you all for providing some insight :)
 

PapaverFollis

Well-Known Member
Joined
13 November 2012
Messages
9,560
Visit site
ForagePlus would be cheaper per iU. But for 2500iU a day I'd be tempted to try Nano-E, if finances allow at all, as the delivery system is different and more efficient.
 

SatansLittleHelper

Well-Known Member
Joined
27 December 2011
Messages
5,763
Location
Shropshire
Visit site
FWIW I doubt Equimins DELIBERATELY set out to deceive their customers initially. But the thing is that they have been negligent on several counts:
* They did not check the analysis of the product in the first instance (which absolutely blows my mind..!!)
* Once they did have the correct information they changed the product label but NOT the website. Most of their customers will be Web based and would only have been privvy to the description there when purchasing.
* When they finally got around to changing the website they didn't make a statement or explanation.
* They should have put out a statement for their customers upon discovering their product was not as described.

I don't think they intended to deceive originally but they have certainly quietly covered up their mistake and that is dishonest and underhanded.
Unfortunately it places doubt in people's minds as to the integrity of the company and it's products going forward.

The thing that makes me the most angry is thinking of people who may have given up on their horses as the product just isn't working, and for the horses themselves that have potentially suffered because of this.
 

DirectorFury

Well-Known Member
Joined
18 February 2015
Messages
3,347
Visit site
FWIW I doubt Equimins DELIBERATELY set out to deceive their customers initially. But the thing is that they have been negligent on several counts:
* They did not check the analysis of the product in the first instance (which absolutely blows my mind..!!)
* Once they did have the correct information they changed the product label but NOT the website. Most of their customers will be Web based and would only have been privvy to the description there when purchasing.
* When they finally got around to changing the website they didn't make a statement or explanation.
* They should have put out a statement for their customers upon discovering their product was not as described.

I don't think they intended to deceive originally but they have certainly quietly covered up their mistake and that is dishonest and underhanded.
Unfortunately it places doubt in people's minds as to the integrity of the company and it's products going forward.

The thing that makes me the most angry is thinking of people who may have given up on their horses as the product just isn't working, and for the horses themselves that have potentially suffered because of this.

I agree with this. The true measure of a company is how they handle things that go wrong, and EQ have shown very poor judgement in their handling of this, from start to finish.
 

PapaverFollis

Well-Known Member
Joined
13 November 2012
Messages
9,560
Visit site
I should probably also say that the mare was on full dose of "de-tye and drink" (probably now "un-tye") when she tyed up too. ? but I stopped feeding that when I got no answer as to how much selenium is in it.
 

black and brown

Well-Known Member
Joined
27 July 2020
Messages
207
Visit site
I was just about to order a new tub of AC powder but thankfully saw this thread first. Any recommendations for an alternative which is low in iron for a barefoot horse?
 

HappyHollyDays

Slave to a house cat, 4 yard cats and 2 ponies
Joined
2 November 2013
Messages
13,796
Location
On the edge of the Cotswolds
Visit site
Just to add another supplier to the mix have a look at Science Supplements NaturalE. I have never used it but am very impressed with the LiverAid and RespirAid, the former has done wonders where FP did nothing after 3 years of use. Their supplements are scientifically researched and every ingredient is there for you to see.
 

onemoretime

Well-Known Member
Joined
12 April 2008
Messages
2,576
Visit site
It was round about march/April 2015.

My two (then 2yr old QH and 14yr old TB) only had the new tub of supp for 2 days too. It was the only new thing (new tub) and the only thing different from their fieldmate, my mums horse. Mums horse are the exact same but had pro balance instead of equimmins advance.

Mine was the powder. I've just checked back and I dont have the emails any more to confirm dates and batch number.

I am so sorry to hear about your horse. That must be heartbreaking
It was round about march/April 2015.

My two (then 2yr old QH and 14yr old TB) only had the new tub of supp for 2 days too. It was the only new thing (new tub) and the only thing different from their fieldmate, my mums horse. Mums horse are the exact same but had pro balance instead of equimmins advance.

Mine was the powder. I've just checked back and I dont have the emails any more to confirm dates and batch number.

I am so sorry to hear about your horse. That must be heartbreaking

Many thanks for your reply TPO. It was a very traumatic experience and one I will never forget. He was absolutely fine when we left to go to Italy and just over a week later he was desperately ill. We thought he had eaten the hawthorn as the vets said they were certain it was a trauma to the gut from eating something sharp ( it still may have been, we shall never really know). I did immediately suspect the new tub of supplement at the time. We had only bought this lovely young horse in April 2013 and lost him in August 2014.
 

ycbm

Einstein would be proud of my Insanity...
Joined
30 January 2015
Messages
58,797
Visit site
Re your 2nd para I now know exactly what I am buying. Why would I change from a make I know works? what would be the point?


Because it's bloody expensive for synthetic vitamin E.

I would have saved £17 of a £55, nearly 30%, spend by buying 250,000iu of bioavailable vitamin E from Forageplus last week if I'd known then that the Equimins was synthetic.
 
Last edited:

paddy555

Well-Known Member
Joined
23 December 2010
Messages
13,679
Visit site
How many of your horses do you test for vitamin E levels, paddy? How many of them when you are already feeding 8000iU of what you think is natural vitamin E? I have posted about this horse numerous times on here, I have read many threads on PSSM. I've been advised to test for PSSM but never to check vitamin E levels. In fact I've seen it said that checking vitamin E levels in blood does not always show up a deficiency anyway. I've been in contact with my vet throughout who has never even wanted to do a blood test or been bothered about the genetic test.

The horse is needle phobic and large, so the vet and I need a bloody good reason to stick her. Testing a horse supposedly being fed 8000iU of natural vitamin E a day for vitamin E deficiency is not a good reason. I put the tye up down to other reasons. Started feeding Alcar and was even more careful about rugging and work increases, boosted the vitamin E back up to 10,000iU.

Currently feeding 6000iU of ForagePlus powder and have better movement then I ever saw on even 10000iU of the Equimins. Now I know why.

I didn't need to test as I found the E product worked when I trialled it. If it hadn't I would have tested as PSSM had been suggested to me as the way forward (by a vet) and knowing the importance of E I would have had to check the levels if it didn't work as well as it should.
I have not tested the rest as i do not suspect PSSM and they have all been supplemented with vit E for many years so I have no real reason to test as I have no problems.

there was a post on here a while ago suggesting checking vit e levels before supplementing. I would not normally write that as a matter of course because I doubt many would pay the vet to test before supplementing and afterwards to check the levels had increased if necessary so it would seem pointless suggesting it.

several (not necessarily on here) have tested vit E levels. I don't think it is unusual or a strange thing to do.

I cannot comment about what your vet asks for. Mine knew just about zero about PSSM and never gave any advice at all. It was only when I asked her to contact a specialist vet that it was even suggested.
 

indie1282

Well-Known Member
Joined
5 February 2012
Messages
1,007
Visit site
No real argument that it works any better?

What planet has he been hiding on?!?!
.

I think this company have not done themselves any favours with how they have dealt with this. There seems to be no acknowledgement of the fact that they have mis-sold this product ( albeit 'unintentionally' in their eyes ?) and now apology to their customers! Thats what most bizarre to me. They say that it has always been synthetic but they blatantly sell and market it as natural..

Saying that there's no evidence that natural works any better is also a ridiculous thing to say...
 

indie1282

Well-Known Member
Joined
5 February 2012
Messages
1,007
Visit site
My read on it is that they didn't fully understand that there is a clear distinction between natural and synthetic vitamin E in the first place. And then have quietly tried to brush it under the carpet when they realised.

This. I don't think they have set out to deliberately mis-sell this product ( at least i hope not ) but as soon as they were aware they should have either taken it off sale immediately or issued a statement and came clean.

It seems to me they hoped nobody would notice and that just seems really shady to me.
 

PapaverFollis

Well-Known Member
Joined
13 November 2012
Messages
9,560
Visit site
I'm not even sure that PSSM horses show up as vitamin E deficient on a test. It may be that they need super high levels of vitamin E and actually fall within normal ranges when tested. The only blood tests I have been recommended have been the ones to check for muscle damage.

It's beside the point. I thought my horse was getting 8000iU of available Vitamin E. She was getting 4000iU because of the dishonesty or stupidity or both of this company.

They can get in the sea.
 

paddy555

Well-Known Member
Joined
23 December 2010
Messages
13,679
Visit site
I'm not even sure that PSSM horses show up as vitamin E deficient on a test.

.
well from people who I know have tested those with low vit E levels show up as low vit e levels on a blood test same as any other horse with low vit e levels. Just because you we not recommended to test vit e levels doesn't mean that it is a bad idea.
 

PapaverFollis

Well-Known Member
Joined
13 November 2012
Messages
9,560
Visit site
As I said paddy, if you want to keep paying way over the odds for synthetic vitamin E from a company that has only just realised that is what it is selling that is entirely up to you. ?‍♀️ Me not testing my mare's vitamin E levels when she tied up while being fed a mis-sold product does not make any difference to the fact it was mis-sold.
 

Rowreach

Adjusting my sails
Joined
13 May 2007
Messages
17,855
Location
Northern Ireland
Visit site
As I said paddy, if you want to keep paying way over the odds for synthetic vitamin E from a company that has only just realised that is what it is selling that is entirely up to you. ?‍♀️ Me not testing my mare's vitamin E levels when she tied up while being fed a mis-sold product does not make any difference to the fact it was mis-sold.

Of course, they probably won't be able to give it away now ............
 

paddy555

Well-Known Member
Joined
23 December 2010
Messages
13,679
Visit site
Because it's bloody expensive for synthetic vitamin E.

I would have saved £17 of a £55, nearly 30%, spend by buying 250,000iu of bioavailable vitamin E from Forageplus last week if I'd known then that the Equimins was synthetic.

I don't understand your problem. If this was wrongly described on their web site when you bought it then ask for a refund and order some from FP. I am sure they will deal with it. If it was correctly described then it was up to you to see that and question it at the time.

There have been lots of comments that I am over paying etc however the cost of E synthetic vit E (to achieve 5000iu) and the cost of FP powder to achieve 5000iu for me is the same within a couple of pounds as I buy a larger container of the E one. So it is very cost effective, I have no hope of saving money by changing, it works, it eliminates wastage I would have with a powder and it is very quick to give to them.
 
Joined
20 February 2017
Messages
3,724
Visit site
This.... Wasn't exactly what I intended this thread to be ?
Please, if you have found something that works for your horse and doesn't offend your moral principles, continue to use it.
I only posted to alert people as I know it's a pretty vital part of managing PSSM and the tack room on here is probably one of the highest traffic horse forums anywhere. But it being synthetic instead of natural may actually mean it's not suitable for some horses and/or their owners anymore.
 
Last edited:

BBP

Well-Known Member
Joined
17 July 2008
Messages
6,477
Visit site
For me it’s not about the cost but the dosage to be effective that I’m unhappy about. My horse does blood test as deficient and has for 5 years. At 10000iu of Equimins vitamin e oil he remained deficient, but to double it to 20000 wouldn’t have occurred to me as it felt like I could be overdosing or that his failure to uptake it was due to other issues. But as synthetic, if it is 50% less bioavailable, I was only feeding the equivalent of 5000iu of natural. So I should have (and will now) increase how much I give him. This does have a cost implication obviously but if it worked I would deal with that. He has shown mild neuro issues, so I do think there is the possibility that it is relevant. I’m not out to witch hunt them or destroy their business,I just want my horse healthy.
 
Top