The Jokers Girl
Well-Known Member
Ad lib is Latin meaning as you desire. The full phrase is ad libitum, its not slang for anything. Alot of the English language is made up of Latin phrases.
When adding it ontop of something like Soothe and Gain though is overkill in the fibre percentage and it's just unnecersary excess energy by that point.
Ad lib is Latin meaning as you desire. The full phrase is ad libitum, its not slang for anything. Alot of the English language is made up of Latin phrases.
3 horses and a pony, 4 in total. Most of the time that bale ran out within 5 days. Not hard to calculate what 200kg / 5 / 4 equals and it's certainly not 2% of 400kg which is the average weight of those horses
For the record, being doing some thinking and some calculations; whilst I was at my previous yard they allowed "ad-lib" (such a rediculous word if you ask me, got to love those slangs) hay with a 200kg round bale which both ponies and horses had access to. I owned a pony, the others had a horse so that was 3 horses and a pony, 4 in total. Most of the time that bale ran out within 5 days. Not hard to calculate what 200kg / 5 / 4 equals and it's certainly not 2% of 400kg which is the average weight of those horses. And no, it's not quite 3% nor is it 4%, infact it's 2.5%, but I can assure you those horses still ate feed ontop of and any haynet offered to them as well! Either way you want to argue that 1.5% - 2% is thee go-to amount of hay a horse should eat per day and yet you also wish to support "ad-lib" which in most cases more likely than not, unless controlled but then it ain't "ad-lib", those horses are generally overeating according to those statistics. Needless to say though that some horses do infact need more than others, especially those poor doers. So yes it is quite possible they'll eat 3% and hell maybe even 4% if you let them. Also, I recall someone arguing on here about fat horses standing around eating hay off the bale which is pretty much contributing to the problem of obesity which I'm sure, heaven forbid, I don't need to explain why that would be a problem? Is this not what you call "ad-lib" ?? Rather oxymoronic if you ask me.
Dictionary said:Slangis language (words, phrases, and usages) of an informal register. It alsosometimes refer to the language generally exclusive to the members of particular in-groups prefer over the common vocabulary of a standard language in order to establish group identity, exclude outsiders,or both..
Latin isn't slang, in fact it is the total opposite.Slang is mostly made up of latin words too so I honetly fail to see your point really. Either way, define "as you desire" ? Should it not be "as the horse desires" ? And if so then how is this focused around 2% which was the whole point in my statement which you seem to have ignored and/or overlooked.
You can't redefine the English language just because you can't, or refuse to understand the use of formal Latin phrases.Crossed out the parts that isn't relevant to the use of "ad-lib" but what I would still consider as "slang" by it's defintiion.
200 kg for 5 days equals 40 kg. 40 kg for 4 horses assuming they eat the same amount is 10 kgs. Assuming it's hay and not haylage its safe to assume that the dry substance is 84% as most hay is. 10 kg hay equals therefor 8.4 kg dry substance. Assuming the horses weigh 400 kgs it means they consume 2.1 kg dry substance per 100 kg weight, i.e the same 2 % (or 2.1% if you wish) that everyone who knows something about horse nutrition have been telling you.
Furthermore, the average horse usually weights around 450-500 kgs, not 400, meaning that the per cent probably is even lower, and using the calculations above around 1.7 %.
You can't redefine the English language just because you can't, or refuse to understand the use of formal Latin phrases.
Ad lib is not a slang phrase. Dosh for money, loo for toilet, knackered for tired.
They are very informal words and phrases and are slang
No Latin words are slang words as Latin is a formal language and by its definition cannot be slang
Well that's funny because most vets and nutritionists will tell you that a horse will not eat more than what they can and should. .
And now you’re just being daft.....
Hark, who's talking? Oh, yet another who wants to set an example and prove my point, bravo. As for your twaddle statement? Tell that to the so-called professionals you all so love to tell us to turn to, want their number while we're at it? Infact I agree, it is a load of twaddle, so is the comments from those who believe it's all gospal and nothing else will change that. Proof is straight from the horse really, and if you can't learn from that well then I just feel sorry for them being in such care, if it can even be called such a thing.
Infact it was a vet that told me to allow my horse so-called "ad-lib" which in her definition meant to let him have as much as he can eat.
Me right now....
View attachment 69523