Helgstrand…

Another bizarre Helgstrand story....

More holes than a string vest. As a starting point I'm afraid I cannot believe that an International competition groom notices a horse in their care is unwell, and is then treated by a vet, but the groom doesnt tell the rider instantly, or if this is impossible for whatever reason, they then dont even tell the rider before the next days competition.
 
It gets weirder and weirder ... the guy can't seem to do anything with integrity, honesty and the horse at the front of his mind
Are we meant to believe noone told him the horse had colic?
Who would ride a Grand Prix on a horse who had colic the previous night?

The horse is a stallion is he not ,this is more common than you think .
 
You put it into a vein & it attracts water to itself therefore increasing blood volume.


I wonder ..... if you put it into the gut and it attracts water to itself ... allowing you to dehydrate the horse overnight to calm it down for the competition, without risking colic from dehydrating the gut ....?

Although I can also see the reasoning, if the horse genuinely had a bit of colic, to use a drug that will keep water in the gut to keep it moving.

But it's really bizarre to do what they did at a high level competition.
.
 
They said in the article the horse was eating normally an hour after being treated for colic. Normally food is withheld for a few hours at least following treatment for colic. Not only non standard medicine but also unusual to allow food again so soon after a colic attack.
 
Its bizarre - for a horse of this quality and price tag I just cannot imagine a vet treating colic with anything other than the standard protocol. Muscle relaxants as a starter, water if its blocked, perhaps sedation. Obviously will rule it out of competing but the colic would have to be pretty minor for it to be business as usual the following day anyway.
 
This is a long read but worth it, includes a very interesting statement from Helgstrand at the end.....

Wow is it cold..

 
This is a long read but worth it, includes a very interesting statement from Helgstrand at the end.....

Wow is it cold..

Very cold.

I know many people who have horses on full livery who cannot see them daily and they would still want to know immediately if the horse had colic. He really doesn't see horses as anything other than a tool / commodity
 
In his own words, he is too busy to be informed about his horse having colic... the mind boggles.
I am pleased reading that article that there does seem movement to stop covering for him and people and federations etc. are creating a little distance between themselves and Helgstrand.
 
He's implying that if the drug had been given into the mouth instead of the stomach direct then it would have been legal. My understanding from posts above is that the only licensed use of the drug is into the bloodstream.

You don't get to be a multi millionaire at anything by being nice and you certainly don't get to be a multi millionaire from horses by being nice to horses.
.
 
Last edited:
This is a long read but worth it, includes a very interesting statement from Helgstrand at the end.....

Wow is it cold..

crikey!

So Helgstrands lawyer was also teh Animal Welfare group lawyer, and his dad was chairman of the DRF! No wonder he felt untouchable!
 
its enough shzte to put you off kissing your own horse

who said you can fool some of the people some of the time, but not all of the people all of the time

why it those who should be monitoring animal welfare at that level are the last to speak out, or so it appears
 

Report above states program airs today in Denmark and has a statement from the stud about measures they have put in place to address 'improvements' they have made.

The article links to the Helgstrand website where the full list of their 'improvements' can be found, as per the link below

 

Report above states program airs today in Denmark and has a statement from the stud about measures they have put in place to address 'improvements' they have made.

The article links to the Helgstrand website where the full list of their 'improvements' can be found, as per the link below

Hands up who believes a word of it.
 
Reading about the "improvements".I do think from the physical point of view i.e feed, vets,farrier etc. their horses are probably well looked after.Its not that that is raising the complaints but their incorrect and abhorent training practices.As for the in house complaints procedure!!! The mind boggles and not in a nice way.
 
Oh I believe what they say for the most part of the statement. It’s on the whole clear demonstrable things. Nice box ticking exercise for them.

The issue primarily is around training methodology for me which is far too grey and that is primary where the abuse is.
Sorry didn't see that before I posted again.
 
Reading about the "improvements".I do think from the physical point of view i.e feed, vets,farrier etc. their horses are probably well looked after.Its not that that is raising the complaints but their incorrect and abhorent training practices.As for the in house complaints procedure!!! The mind boggles and not in a nice way.

I think the vast majority of competitors would tick those boxes, but the horses get little chance to exhibit natural behaviours, show lots of signs from the Sue Dyson pain ethogram AND are using training methods that would be outlawed in the warmup (or rather are outlawed but so often a blind eye is turned anyway).
 
Awful man. Between him and the likes of the teacher who punched her horse, are the general public ever going to believe the majority of horse people that this is not normal practice. I worked with horses for nearly forty years and never once has it been acceptable to punch, kick, gouge with spurs, yank their mouths etc. I worked for people who I considered hard but never once saw behaviour like this from them nor would it have been accepted behaviour from me. I had a dressage friend whose horses I hacked out and she never did anything of this ilk. She wasn’t at the very top but she did compete on our stressage teams. I despair, I really do. I know I won’t be able to watch the documentary.
 
Last edited:
Top