Gloi
Too little time, too much to read.
If the YOs car had been in an accident in the snow and the police had come you could both have been fined under the covid laws.
I just don't understand when you first spoke to the YM (at mid-day) why you didn't ask them to just bring in and give enough hay for the rest of the day and night. You may have had to pay but can't see why there was such a drama and why you got the owner involved. Your day - your responsibility to sort it out
I just don't understand when you first spoke to the YM (at mid-day) why you didn't ask them to just bring in and give enough hay for the rest of the day and night. You may have had to pay but can't see why there was such a drama and why you got the owner involved. Your day - your responsibility to sort it out
Why would you "be slated" for taking responsibility for sorting out your share horse? Why does the owner need to make a decision? All you should have done was make sure that on a day YOU took responsibility for looking after their horse you made a decision. Alternatively, why didn't you contact the owner earlier to say you couldn't make it to the yard?Why would I not involve the owner about an issue and decision relating to their horse? If I'd come on here saying I'd tried to sort it myself and decided what should happen on my own I'm sure I'd be slated for not consulting the owner. Sharers can't win it seems.
If you read you will see I did offer to pay YM (on top of what I pay owner for the share) or make up in doing extra jobs for her on another day. This was declined.
Why would you "be slated" for taking responsibility for sorting out your share horse? Why does the owner need to make a decision? All you should have done was make sure that on a day YOU took responsibility for looking after their horse you made a decision. Alternatively, why didn't you contact the owner earlier to say you couldn't make it to the yard?
You took on an agreement to do basic day to day jobs on agreed days. Part of that responsibility is to make sure that those jobs are done.
Sorry I have a different view to you, but in my opinion part of having a share horse is to see if you are ready to have your own horse, and to do that, you have to be ready to make sure they are looked after on daily basic chores
Why would you "be slated" for taking responsibility for sorting out your share horse? Why does the owner need to make a decision? All you should have done was make sure that on a day YOU took responsibility for looking after their horse you made a decision. Alternatively, why didn't you contact the owner earlier to say you couldn't make it to the yard?
You took on an agreement to do basic day to day jobs on agreed days. Part of that responsibility is to make sure that those jobs are done.
Sorry I have a different view to you, but in my opinion part of having a share horse is to see if you are ready to have your own horse, and to do that, you have to be ready to make sure they are looked after on daily basic chores
Very tricky situation.
Blimey! Wind your neck in! They need to talk about getting future plans in place.If you have made a commitment you cannot just decided I cannot do it. Drive and walk, get a taxi.
Phone a friend. Have a plan already.
You always need to think what if. I always have mine on an in. Why for the very real reason the yard knows I want ponies in. I have no idea what the weather is like when I am in Scotland, merthyr or Cornwall. So always want my horses being brought in.
What would happen if pony was turned out and poor sod was left out alone going mental. Wondering why he had been left out to be killed by wolves.
The whole post is appalling from yard owner to owner to loaner. You all need your heads banging together and need to start putting the welfare of the pony first. If yard cannot oblige move. If owner can't be bothered give her notice and the loaner too.
I think this post is pretty condescending. Plenty of sharers are not sharing to see if they are ready for ownership, often they’ve owned and circumstances have change.
Why would you "be slated" for taking responsibility for sorting out your share horse? Why does the owner need to make a decision? All you should have done was make sure that on a day YOU took responsibility for looking after their horse you made a decision. Alternatively, why didn't you contact the owner earlier to say you couldn't make it to the yard?
You took on an agreement to do basic day to day jobs on agreed days. Part of that responsibility is to make sure that those jobs are done.
Sorry I have a different view to you, but in my opinion part of having a share horse is to see if you are ready to have your own horse, and to do that, you have to be ready to make sure they are looked after on daily basic chores
I actually think SPD is showing what a great sharer they are by how they've shown consideration to the horse, horse owner and YM
I think the OPs plan to discuss future arrangements is a good one, because this ought to have been sorted in principle by the owner in advance IMO.
Snow is one thing, what if OP was taken very ill on her day? There should be contingency in place and i believe its down to the owner to arrange that as the horse is ultimately their responsibility.
Surely you can’t accept a lift at the moment due to COVID...Hhmm I think take her up on the offer of a lift. Difficult.
Exactly this! I share because I own 2 retired horses and still want to ride, WITHOUT the cost or responsibility of owning a third horse!I think this post is pretty condescending. Plenty of sharers are not sharing to see if they are ready for ownership, often they’ve owned and circumstances have changed.
Ultimately the great thing about a share is you DON’T have the responsibility owners do. Such as vet bills and tough decisions. And IMO exceptional circumstances ie driving conditions is one of those things where an owner needs to step up and be an owner.
I am quite shocked by some of the attitudes of people on here. I hope I never end up sharing and accidentally have an owner who has these sorts of attitude. Where is the compassion and the appreciation for a sharer who is actually trying to do the right thing.
If you trust someone enough to care for your horses, at least try and look after them a bit and work together!
Surely you can’t accept a lift at the moment due to COVID...
Yeah, I think Hashrouge and Wishfilly are spot on. The arrangement is (and will always be) inheritently unequal, and while the sharer has responsibility for the horse on their days, it still isn't their horse. They can't make decisions for it as if it was their horse. The buck always stops with the owner. And as pointed out above, it isn't the sharer's call to keep the horse at a yard that's awkward to access in snow, or doesn't provide cover in an emergency. Since the owner chose to keep their horse at this place, it's up to them to have a plan for dealing with these situations.
The downside of a share is that you can't make decisions for or ultimately be in control of the horse. The upside is that you get to ride a horse several days per week, and the hard stuff isn't your problem.
I'm don't think I'm a great sharer tbh. I'm not a particularly skilled rider, and I'm not very confident. But I do my best, I take pride in the jobs I do, I offer to make myself useful around the yard for owner and YM, I'm safety conscious, I ask if I'm not sure, and always want to learn more so that I do as good a job for the horses I interact with as I can. y.
I am not really getting how this works. Because yes it is the owner's choice where the horse is kept, but surely a sharer also has the choice of whether that location is OK for them, and if it is not they can look for another horse. And I am guessing that the owner pays vet bills etc?
I am also wondering what is the general split of costs? Say a horse is worked 6 days a week and a sharer takes 3 of the days the horse works would you expect to just pay 50% of the livery / food / shoeing costs? If so it seems like a great deal, no vets bills or unexpected expenses, owner provides equipment and you can end it with short notice in case of a problem. Or does it work some other way, a longer term commitment that can't be terminated in case the horse is out of action?
Well yes it is a good deal, but don't forget most horses in the UK are kept at DIY livery set ups, so the owner is also getting a good deal because they get free care for their horse and a financial contribution. Alternatively, if the horse is kept at part or full livery, the cost for sharing will likely be higher and the owner will be getting a good chunk of their livery costs paid. The owner is also able to end the arrangement at short notice should they want to. The mistake is in assuming this is an equal arrangement though - the sharer can't make any decisions about the horse's care/training/ routine/ equipment/ where it is kept etc. So it's not really right or fair for the owner to expect them to deal with difficult situations just because they happen on the sharer's day.I am not really getting how this works. Because yes it is the owner's choice where the horse is kept, but surely a sharer also has the choice of whether that location is OK for them, and if it is not they can look for another horse. And I am guessing that the owner pays vet bills etc?
I am also wondering what is the general split of costs? Say a horse is worked 6 days a week and a sharer takes 3 of the days the horse works would you expect to just pay 50% of the livery / food / shoeing costs? If so it seems like a great deal, no vets bills or unexpected expenses, owner provides equipment and you can end it with short notice in case of a problem. Or does it work some other way, a longer term commitment that can't be terminated in case the horse is out of action?