PurpleSpots
Well-Known Member
I suspect so.
eta oh, Hoofing Marvellous maybe?
Ah, perfect, I'm sure you're right - thank you!!
I suspect so.
eta oh, Hoofing Marvellous maybe?
Literally LOLing at this one...
SV: I see things I don’t agree with on FB; I not only keep my opinions to myself, but I also never feel the need to be vile to someone?!
Hahahahahahahahahaha!!!!!!!!
I’ve not seen what she’s posted as I don’t go to look when a new post appears. I don’t want her in my head. But publishing CCTV footage for likes is against GDPR
View attachment 151406
If they do they will be deleted and blocked.but has no one pulled her up on this?
You can monetise content if you have 10,000 followers, not likes. Facebook itself doesn't pay, it allows you to add brands and adverts to your posts, or make the post available via subscription.Apparently if you hit 10k likes on Facebook then your page is monetised. The more comments per post then the more money she gets which possibly explains the more controversial posts?
One person had commented that it was a video of a child and those commenting should be ashamed of themselves, and for it to please be taken down - or words to that effect.
Yet nobody who has commented has paid any attention at all. It's just terrible .
I imagine Facebook. I reported for bullying of a minor, as did others. She'll be furious!Post has been deleted! Wonder if it’s SV or Facebook
Not before screen shots were taken though. Someone's going to get into trouble with the ICO.... now where's my tiny violin?Post has been deleted! Wonder if it’s SV or Facebook
She is! Having a massive strop over on fb.She'll be furious!
This. I didn't know at the time that the person was a minor, and no one was identifiable. There was no situational context to the video, which she has explained in the later post this morning - there is a lot of tension between the two parties, the person appearing to struggle with the gate is apparently perfectly capable of managing it on plenty of other occasions, and they generally seem to enjoy damaging her property, which the gate is.RARELY would I ever sit slightly on the side of the shouty vet, but how do we know that girl was a minor? She was being incredibly dim with the gate....
Albeit its no excuse for inciting public ridiculing
As it's her personal CCTV I don't know if the rules would be the same, although she is using the footage on her 'business' Facebook page.I’ve not seen what she’s posted as I don’t go to look when a new post appears. I don’t want her in my head. But publishing CCTV footage for likes is against GDPR
View attachment 151406
This. I didn't know at the time that the person was a minor, and no one was identifiable. There was no situational context to the video, which she has explained in the later post this morning - there is a lot of tension between the two parties, the person appearing to struggle with the gate is apparently perfectly capable of managing it on plenty of other occasions, and they generally seem to enjoy damaging her property, which the gate is.
No, she shouldn't have posted it, given the tension, but as a video in itself, it didn't occur to me when I watched it yesterday that it may be particularly problematic. Unwise, yes, and mean-spirited, but not the worst thing anyone has ever done.
Her whole post this morning is quite sad, and whatever you think of her, no one should have to live under constant harassment on private property such as she has described.
Why do people bother following this tiresome woman?
Ah, but given past history, can we believe anything she writes? Or believe that it is the whole truth?
For example, she used to - and may still - poo pick the fields by flinging the muck onto the track others have to drive over... So them sweeping leaves/manure back off the track may just be them trying to make good on what she has done in the first place.
I'm certain there could be counters to all the other 'woe is me' claims she has made too, but in all honesty I've better things to do than trawl back through lots of posts. If she was so lovely though, why would she rile so many people?
no one was identifiable
Not trying to come down on her 'side'. and it may be 'her' truth but I'm absolutely certain it's not the whole truth.Ah, but given past history, can we believe anything she writes? Or believe that it is the whole truth?
For example, she used to - and may still - poo pick the fields by flinging the muck onto the track others have to drive over... So them sweeping leaves/manure back off the track may just be them trying to make good on what she has done in the first place.
I'm certain there could be counters to all the other 'woe is me' claims she has made too, but in all honesty I've better things to do than trawl back through lots of posts. If she was so lovely though, why would she rile so many people?
I suppose. I had just assumed it was a random visitor until I saw the post this morning.Clearly the person was identifiable to people who knew her though, and it stands to reason that the person in question could know about it and be affected by all the nonsensical things people have written about her.