sakura
Well-Known Member
Reputation? Or a desire to no longer be deluged with death threats, property damage, livelihoods destroyed and civil unrest in the countryside by a nameless , shameless group of balaclava-clad terrorists.
Arguably not one fox has been saved as a result of all their action. If a fox is a problem it will still be culled.
Traditionally land owners never had a problem with the hunts, they were invited and welcomed until the sabs turned up (clues in the name) sabs forced the ban but not content with that they set about further disruption and chaos and prevented hunts who were observing the law from functioning at all. It's a war they couldn't lose but it gained absolutely nothing for the fox.
I know this argument has been done every which way but lets not pretend there's something noble going on here re: the licences. This is about having millions in reserve and hanging on to it.
Ah yes, the age old argument of blaming sabs for all of hunting's problems.
Or perhaps, it could be that the general, voting, public simply do not like to see foxes chased and ripped apart? I don't know, maybe we'll never know ...
https://yougov.co.uk/topics/politics/explore/issue/Fox_hunting