shortstuff99
Well-Known Member
The guilty verdict by a jury of his peers is not evidence enough?evidence please
The guilty verdict by a jury of his peers is not evidence enough?evidence please
Hunt sabs who care terribly about animals and want to protect them..you don't care about their cause..why?And just to add, people with extreme views on either side never do their cause any favours. Good thing most of us are reasonably well balanced!
we will all be judgedThe guilty verdict by a jury of his peers is not evidence enough?
please explain?The guilty verdict by a jury of his peers is not evidence enough?
I hope you're not meaning that in the religious sense because I'm Agnostic ?we will all be judged
You asked for evidence. He was found guilty beyond reasonable doubt by a jury of people selected from his local area. That means evidence was presented and was found to prove him guilty. Ergo evidence.please explain?
ah, ok, I seeYou asked for evidence. He was found guilty beyond reasonable doubt by a jury of people selected from his local area. That means evidence was presented and was found to prove him guilty. Ergo evidence.
I'm not defending them but I want them to be monitored correctly and within the law. You lose the support if you break the law as much as they do.The illegal cruel hunting and killing of Foxes and other animals by hunts is ongoing. If you are Anti hunting, why are you defending hunts?
Also speaking from our hunts perspective, we take no issue with hunt monitors, the ones who actually JUST monitor hunts. We have nothing to hide and would not care at all if monitors observed peacefully. What we take issue with, is the local sabs interfering, trespassing, and going out of their way to intimate and upset riders and horses alike.
The illegal cruel hunting and killing of Foxes and other animals by hunts is ongoing. If you are Anti hunting, why are you defending hunts?
I take issue with hunt killing, trespass, intimidation towards landowners, Badger Sett blocking, steward thuggery, etc. Hunt sabs do an amazing job of saving wildlife in the face of real violence.Also speaking from our hunts perspective, we take no issue with hunt monitors, the ones who actually JUST monitor hunts. We have nothing to hide and would not care at all if monitors observed peacefully. What we take issue with, is the local sabs interfering, trespassing, and going out of their way to intimidate and upset riders and horses alike.
You are just randomly replying to posts with your own agenda without reading the post you are replying to.I take issue with hunt killing, trespass, intimidation towards landowners, Badger Sett blocking, steward thuggery, etc. Hunt sabs do an amazing job of saving wildlife in the face of real violence.
Hunts are out today, no "trail laying" has been observed. Hunts taking their dogs on the highways and on railway tracks is hugely irresponsible and a very real danger.To somewhat counterbalance the opinion that all Hunt sabs are violent thugs, that is not so in my very limited experience. I have witnessed sabs in action.
Displaying a hostile stance and verbal aggression to the hunt and hunt support, yes. But no fisticuffs and no deliberate hands on harming of horses or hounds.
I do not condone their active disruption of a day’s hunting by use of horn calls and gizmos which lead to hounds straying and getting onto roads or other places where they should not be. This can lead to hounds being hurt or killed by traffic. Apart from anything, this disruption gives the Hunt a cop out if a fox gets killed, as the sabs can be blamed for interfering with the huntsman’s control of hounds.
Local sabs are still out, but are now just observing (so effectively ‘monitoring’) the hunt. I imagine they would ramp up their response right back up if they saw illegal activity. So they have adjusted their behaviour after the Hunt adjusted theirs.
I take issue with hunt killing, trespass, intimidation towards landowners, Badger Sett blocking, steward thuggery, etc. Hunt sabs do an amazing job of saving wildlife in the face of real violence.
any shooting people? is it permitted, accepted, OK or not for shot (pheasants/ducks) to land on neigbouring barns, houses, stables, people? is it something people have to accept and am I being unreasonable objecting?
shooting today, left 2 horses in as I thought they were safer, shot rained down onto the tin roof and horses went frantic. This has happened before. Got one horse out who was panicking and then shot rained down on both me and the horse as I was leading him out.
Stables are not in the middle of nowhere, they are 10 ft from my back door so shot would also have come on the house roof. Haven't said anything till now but spoke to the shoot today. Not sure if this will happen again. Is it normal for it to happen? AIBU? The horse (a rescue pony with problems) that I left inside had been under the loft floor (ie not under the tin part) but he was still terrified when he heard the shot on the tin. 4 hours later he was still heavy breathing, scared and wouldn't eat. Fortunately he was not a nervous horse or he could have had colic. any comments even if you think I am being silly.
Definitely not unreasonable! How awful for you and the horses! I had a shoot next to mine today and they terrified my new horse, didn't even know they were coming (my older ones are used to it now).any shooting people? is it permitted, accepted, OK or not for shot (pheasants/ducks) to land on neigbouring barns, houses, stables, people? is it something people have to accept and am I being unreasonable objecting?
shooting today, left 2 horses in as I thought they were safer, shot rained down onto the tin roof and horses went frantic. This has happened before. Got one horse out who was panicking and then shot rained down on both me and the horse as I was leading him out.
Stables are not in the middle of nowhere, they are 10 ft from my back door so shot would also have come on the house roof. Haven't said anything till now but spoke to the shoot today. Not sure if this will happen again. Is it normal for it to happen? AIBU? The horse (a rescue pony with problems) that I left inside had been under the loft floor (ie not under the tin part) but he was still terrified when he heard the shot on the tin. 4 hours later he was still heavy breathing, scared and wouldn't eat. Fortunately he was not a nervous horse or he could have had colic. any comments even if you think I am being silly.
Definitely not being unreasonable, there are strict guidelines they should be following regarding highways and residential areas. What was their response?
Paddy555, that is terrible, and completely unacceptable .
A bit of info on here.
https://www.sportingshooter.co.uk/a...law-on-shooting-shotguns-near-roads-1-6777966
Shooting a shotgun within 50 feet of a highway is not prohibited in England and Wales, but an offence is committed if, as the result of firing a shotgun, someone is injured or placed in danger. This could easily be the result of a shot charge over the head of a walker or cyclist, pellets dropping on a vehicle or striking it, a horse and rider alarmed by the sound of a shot or, in the worst scenario, a passer-by hit by pellets.