shortstuff99
Well-Known Member
There is a reason Gio was sold and it wasn't especially for the money.....Gio was hardly the most impressive for gaits but he got an Olympic bronze thru charlottes sheer determination
There is a reason Gio was sold and it wasn't especially for the money.....Gio was hardly the most impressive for gaits but he got an Olympic bronze thru charlottes sheer determination
There is a reason Gio was sold and it wasn't especially for the money.....
You are right.It does look odd.This horse won today in Neumünsterm I’m not familiar with the rider or the horse.
I found the forelegs very distracting, over exaggerated movement and during the passage style steps, the horse was holding the leg up and it was dangling almost for half a beat extra, I’m not really sure how else to explain it but it just looked very strange to me.
Very spidery legs!This horse won today in Neumünsterm I’m not familiar with the rider or the horse.
I found the forelegs very distracting, over exaggerated movement and during the passage style steps, the horse was holding the leg up and it was dangling almost for half a beat extra, I’m not really sure how else to explain it but it just looked very strange to me.
They almost verge on the big lickI couldn’t take my eyes off the hooves, it looks like he’s wearing platforms!
maybe I’m just used to looking at my horses crappy flat feet.
That's interesting - so the possibility that one copy of the gene leads to a certain level of hyper mobility?There was an interesting discussion I came across earlier about whether WFFS is contributing to this very massive (but slightly strange) action in modern dressage horses. Everdale is a carrier, so is Apache, Totilas etc.
A connective tissue disorder which is fatal if a foal gets two copies of the gene. It's one of the animal genetics tests but naive me assumed people would want to breed it out.What is WFFS?
Yes, as all the breeders say (obviously) that one copy is fine etc but the carriers of it do show this very extravagant, over action.That's interesting - so the possibility that one copy of the gene leads to a certain level of hyper mobility?
That is...quite disgusting. fgs, it is narcissistic and somehow a bit debauched.Yes, as all the breeders say (obviously) that one copy is fine etc but the carriers of it do show this very extravagant, over action.
That article is basically just saying stallions carring the gene should not be paired witn mares carrying the gene - but should still be used as breeding stallions because of their 'quality'. So nothing about the fact that it can't be a coincidence that a rare defect is found in SO MANY top stallions - because hypermobility is rewarded not punished. It all comes back to the dire state of dressage judging. There needs to be root and branch reform of all of it. What is desirable in terms of movement, re-focus on harmony and relaxation, penalities for any tension. If that hypermobile movement was marked down for the defect it actually is, then those horses would not be bred from, as they would be seen as conformationally very flawed.
This! BUT, if there is a sense that a genetic defect which can actually have quite devastating effects, is 'useful' in creating or enhancing the extraordinary movement of some sport horses; without really understanding the clinical impact of the 1copy of the gene, that seems massively irresponsible and very, very distasteful imo. There is a wider problem of soundness and longevity in sport horses generally so using the potential of a genetic blip, or even just believing that it's useful, is pretty revolting to me.I’m just going to pull this up for clarification of what you are saying here, because the way I read it you are saying that one copy of the gene causes hypermobility.
As far as I’m aware, there is no evidence to support this and given you work in a clinical field I’m sure you understand the significance of such a statement.
Now there is a hypothesis that it might have some influence (in addition to plenty of other things!) on the hypermobility. It is a valid and interesting hypothesis that should be high in the funding for research list. But it is not a statement of fact.
Personally, in the interim I’d be very supportive of horses with one copy, bred from X date on, not being eligible to go into breeding registers. This would then naturally over time breed out the gene.
But I’d be a little wary of completely excluding good sound performance Sporthorses proving their worth from the entire gene pool just yet.
This isn’t just a dressage horse thing. It’s sj and eventing too.