ElectricChampagne
Well-Known Member
She's not the only journalist to be offered that either... Some have gone too, but again it was obviously staged
nope but it's illegal t spend them on anything else but the issue they were raised for. That's called fraud.
since you are a fan of AHAr and obviously came on here to defend them.
Do you condone the allowing Hero to get in that state in the field while in their care? Do you look at that video and think it's fine?
Which journalist was that? I saw a post on their page where a journalist had gone there unannounced and they wernt happy!! Also saw on their page she has a goose in her house- that doesnt seem right, I think he needs to be outside with access to a pond
What reason do you have for saying that? It was March this year
the journalist who wrote the article in the paper never went there. She got all her information from the exposers page.
No.In that case you would still receive an answer from the freedom of information officer stating just that. My self think, because AHAR is NOT a public body, the FoI act might not apply.
Hero has a congenital club foot, meaning she was born with it.
Are you that journalist? if not, how do you know???
the journalist who wrote the article in the paper never went there. She got all her information from the exposers page.
Nope. but as one does, you are being selective in your response. Back to the intitial subject of this thread, hero came to ahar in ausguts 2015.The initial post had 265 likes, 78 shares and more than 100 comments. 75% of those comments promise a donation.Given the fact that this pony has not been treated more than initially,tell me , where did the money go?
No, I'm not the journalist. But I do believe it said so in the article.
If she did go though, why use all the photographs and the information taken from the exposers page. Why not use photographs taken during the visit?
incorrect.As I was directly involved,I know exactly where her information came from.
you're missing the point. She never visited. For the simple fact that she was under the strong impression she would be led onto a merry go round.
respectfully- thats non of your business.Oh come on, the article was pretty much identical to what was said on the exposers page and all of the photographs printed in that article came from there. Or were you the one who went in under false pretenses?
So how can you explain the deterioration as from when she had treatment from Ahar until she was found, her hooves are overgrown and cracked and she is walking far worse then when she first arrived. Why was she turned out in that dump of a field 1/2 hrs drive from Ahar, Ahar described it as luxury grazing when any fool can see its scrub, wetlands.
respectfully- thats non of your business.
re article- you want to look again
Which journalist was that? I saw a post on their page where a journalist had gone there unannounced and they wernt happy!! Also saw on their page she has a goose in her house- that doesnt seem right, I think he needs to be outside with access to a pond
I have my answer.
It isn't my place to explain it. Perhaps you would be better off asking the vet and farrier that question as they would be the one's who are in the know.
I don't frequent that page. I shall have a look
Hero has a congenital club foot, meaning she was born with it.
you think? ah well..good for you. I can't seem to find the letter you are referring to anywhere.Care to point me in the right direction?
The gosling with a cast on it's leg, in a pond?
The gosling with a cast on it's leg, in a pond?
I didnt see the one in a pond, saw one on an indoor wooden floor, I hope he does have a pond to go to....
No, I'm not the journalist. But I do believe it said so in the article.
If she did go though, why use all the photographs and the information taken from the exposers page. Why not use photographs taken during the visit?