Fieldlife
Well-Known Member
It isnt just harrowing, it is also checking the health and welfare of each horse twice a day, meaning the owners do not need to visit both ends of the day. Even if not fed, should be checked twice a day, and that shouldnt be cost free.So £160 a month for the use of field and arena, plus £165 for harrowing the field and giving feed/hay?
What options do you have for restricted grazing? Shelter? Where do people store their feed so you can give it? Would you add supplements?
In the summer, the type of horse/pony that comfortably lives out all year wouldn’t need any feed or hay, so the owner actively wouldn’t want you to feed at all. Is that an option, and how does that work if you are feeding the other horse in the field? Given they don’t need feeding, the owner is then paying you £165 a month to harrow the field. Would seem expensive to them. Equally in winter, many horses are fine on just hay, and you cannot harrow in the wet, so they are then paying £165 extra for you to check the horse once a day if they are up to ride at the other end.
We are living in times with a high cost of living and lower disposable income, so many people would rather save money wherever they could. I don’t think £160 for hardstanding, use of field, stable in emergency/for dentist visits etc plus arena is bad. Maybe a little more to include harrowing (although you can’t harrow in winter as it’s too wet, so what do you do then?). I wouldn’t pay someone to feed and hay my horse when I could do it after riding though.
If you want full control, offer full grass livery, work out a price that includes absolutely everything, and then you do it all so owners can just come up when they want to ride and not worry about care. Or just do retirement livery?