Poor people

AShetlandBitMeOnce

Well-Known Member
Joined
25 January 2015
Messages
5,576
Visit site
as a non dog owner i don't want to fork out to cover the expenses of a dog licensing system.
it's not like paying for public goods like schools or libraries which i also don't (now) use.

If you have to register your details with a centralised body to own the dog as I said in my post, then you could easily just charge dog owners for the services. £x per dog per month?
 
Last edited:

skinnydipper

Well-Known Member
Joined
11 February 2018
Messages
6,305
Visit site
If they don't buy it, how can it be provided without people who don't own dogs having to pay taxes to finance it?
.
Are you saying only dog owners should feel safe from dogs? Shouldn't everyone?


It is not reasonable to expect someone who doesn't have a dog to finance someone else's pet.

Yes, everyone should feel safe from dogs but that is the dog owner's responsibility.
 
Last edited:

CorvusCorax

Justified & Ancient
Joined
15 January 2008
Messages
57,451
Location
Mu Mu Land
Visit site
A slightly silly and provocative question to ask on this forum?

Is it? I just don't understand why people demand something be done, other people put forward suggestions, submit that it is working (better, not perfectly) in other countries (a cursory Google can find examples of people being fined and even jailed for not paying their licence) and then it's just more NOPE.
If banning breeds worked, then none of this would be happening.
 

CorvusCorax

Justified & Ancient
Joined
15 January 2008
Messages
57,451
Location
Mu Mu Land
Visit site
Are all dog owners and breeders on board with the suggestions? Even if tightened measures may make things slightly difficult for them too, but for the greater good of all dogs and owners and the public?

Because that's always been a problem, I find that people think the ideas are great, until it might apply to them.
 

Clodagh

Well-Known Member
Joined
17 August 2005
Messages
25,192
Location
Devon
Visit site
Are all dog owners and breeders on board with the suggestions? Even if tightened measures may make things slightly difficult for them too, but for the greater good of all dogs and owners and the public?

Because that's always been a problem, I find that people think the ideas are great, until it might apply to them.
Well I can’t speak for the masses but most people on AAD are presumably responsible and are suggesting licensing and controls so I’m not sure many would be opposed to having to pay a fee or demonstrate some knowledge.
 

Moobli

Well-Known Member
Joined
13 June 2013
Messages
5,861
Location
Scotland
Visit site
I would agree to a dog tax, run much the same way as car tax. You need a licence to own any dog and tax on a sliding scale to reflect the size/breed. It would need to be policed similarly to car tax too, with a centralised database so any dog warden (or whoever was employed to check) could easily access all the required information. Big penalities for those who aren't licenced and/or didn't have tax.
 

The Fuzzy Furry

Getting old disgracefully
Joined
24 November 2010
Messages
28,595
Location
Pootling around......
Visit site
My experience in the welfare sector leaves with depressing view that increased regulation would only be accepted by those who don’t need it the problem people would just ignore it
Agreed.
Same as with equines without microchips and no passports, mandatory but very very rarely enforced.

Going further, it's very rare to read of anyone being caught using mobile whilst driving, just as rare as a standard police patrol...... no funding to enable either issue to be rectified.
 

CorvusCorax

Justified & Ancient
Joined
15 January 2008
Messages
57,451
Location
Mu Mu Land
Visit site
It's very rare to read because there aren't enough journalists in the world to sit in every county court every day of the week covering licencing sittings or listing every single minor motoring offence/fine, two lines doesn't do much to fill a paper and there's little public interest unless the crime or the fine is stupendous.
 

Nasicus

Well-Known Member
Joined
15 December 2015
Messages
2,196
Visit site
ETA: On the staffy front, I am sure the breed has been heavily influenced by pitbulls now. The staffy types of old were short and squat and were the most even tempered, good family dogs I have ever come across. Now I see more and more of the tall, leggy, tendency to be a bit unbalanced types.. Has anyone else noticed this?

YES! I'm forever being introduced to 'staffies' that look like they could bench press 100lbs nowadays.
 

SilverLinings

Well-Known Member
Joined
12 August 2017
Messages
2,515
Visit site
I read an article a few years ago (just pre-pandemic) in which a MET policeman was interviewed about dangerous dogs and the increase in attacks. He said that young men were increasingly owning them as a weapon, as a police officer could stop and search someone they suspect is carrying a knife, and if they are found to have a knife they'd be in big trouble, but walking around with scary dog wasn't a reason to be stopped (and apparently actually deterred some police from approaching), despite it potentially being as - or more - dangerous.

If all dogs were licensed then maybe certain breeds could be made a legitimate reason for police to stop the owner (IF they suspected the dog may be being trained or used as a 'weapon'), and if the owner then couldn't then produce evidence of a licence/chip/insurance/etc then the owner could be fined/prosecuted/dog removed even if it wasn't deemed to be dangerous. This could help reduce the risk of certain types of people just ignoring the requirement for a chip/licence/etc.
 

IrishMilo

Well-Known Member
Joined
24 April 2020
Messages
1,536
Visit site
YES! I'm forever being introduced to 'staffies' that look like they could bench press 100lbs nowadays.

It's sad. Staffies should be small, chunky but not bulky and well proportioned. Now all you have are either blues who look like they've been supersized or very leggy types.

The quality in the UK has been going down hill for years - the selection in France and Sweden is much, much better.

For what it's worth, I love them - they're my breed, but they can be shitbags. I've never had one that wasn't fantastic with children and people though. To be honest, that's why they're so popular.
 

MurphysMinder

Well-Known Member
Joined
20 November 2006
Messages
17,818
Location
Shropshire
Visit site
I would fully support licensing, but honestly don't think it would work without the means to strictly enforce it , and that is unlikely to happen. Back in the day when we had dog licences it was the responsible owners who had them and the mutts who wandered the streets who were generally unlicensed. Having said that these latch key dogs always seemed to be very good natured, there may have been children killed but it didn't make the news as far as I am aware. Similarly with the current breeders license, responsible breeders are being made to jump through hoops, and in some cases give up, because of the license whereas the byb just churn out pups without a care. Latest gem apparently from a licensing authority is telling breeders they must rehome their old, retired dogs if they want to keep a puppy or buy a younger dog. This is all down to the supposed space allowed per dog.
 

GSD Woman

Well-Known Member
Joined
9 December 2018
Messages
1,503
Visit site
When my son was posted to Germany he took his dog with him. He had to sit an exam to demonstrate he had sufficient knowledge of dog care, control and needs and have a vet assessment of his dog’s appropriate socialisation before he could get the mandatory dog licence. My son is a vet and was there to work as a vet. Clearly daft people could still purchase a poorly puppy from unscrupulous breeders without producing their qualification but if dog licences were reintroduced and obtaining a licence was contingent on passing a knowledge test and a maybe a vet tech assessment of the puppy it might be a start.

I haven't made it through the entire thread but I have to throw out something about using a vet tech for something this serious. Many vet techs couldn't find their rear holes with both hands as far as knowing about dogs and dog behavior. The lack of actual hands on dog training and behavior from vet techs is quit scarey.
 

Pearlsasinger

Up in the clouds
Joined
20 February 2009
Messages
44,944
Location
W. Yorks
Visit site
Good news. All parents in this situation ( when the attack is in their home) should be charged with man slaughter.


I really don't understand why the mother wasn't charged, as she apparently was the one who left the baby and the dog alone together in the room, while the father was outside in the garden. The father certainly doesn't sound like the type of owner one would hope for, for any dog, or the type of father one would hope for, for any child but the mother also sounds irresponsible.
 

Meowy Catkin

Meow!
Joined
19 July 2010
Messages
22,635
Visit site
I've not seen it stated where the dog was when the Mother left the room. Maybe it was in the garden which would certainly fit better with the Mother not being charged?
 

Pearlsasinger

Up in the clouds
Joined
20 February 2009
Messages
44,944
Location
W. Yorks
Visit site
I've not seen it stated where the dog was when the Mother left the room. Maybe it was in the garden which would certainly fit better with the Mother not being charged?
The report linked to above said that mother went to the toilet leaving the dog and baby together while father was outside in the garden.
 
Top