emlybob
Well-Known Member
To me, I didnt like the way theat OMT's rider had to kick him every stride round the arena. To me the horse lacked quality and movement, so not for me but everyone is after something different. I knew him as a young horse and very much disliked his attitude to work then, and to see him so many years on, nothing has changed. And the fact that he has failed gradings makes me question his quality even more.
On the other hand his sire Java Tiger was one of the most phenomenal and influential TB stallions in the sports horse industry. OMT'S is nothing at all like his father but with Java tigers influence maybe can skip a generation.
Sadly I liked nothing about the horse, but many people thought he looked fantastic. I breed for dressage so would be looking for a different thing.
I thought Archie was fantastic as always. Solaris Amoureux another super stallion. Decanter really can move and is exceptionally well gained so all credit goes to his rider.
The Woodlander stallions all super, the question of whether the 2 and 1/2 year olds should have been presented under saddle is another story!!
I am sure I will get left on for my comments but again, only my opinion
On the other hand his sire Java Tiger was one of the most phenomenal and influential TB stallions in the sports horse industry. OMT'S is nothing at all like his father but with Java tigers influence maybe can skip a generation.
Sadly I liked nothing about the horse, but many people thought he looked fantastic. I breed for dressage so would be looking for a different thing.
I thought Archie was fantastic as always. Solaris Amoureux another super stallion. Decanter really can move and is exceptionally well gained so all credit goes to his rider.
The Woodlander stallions all super, the question of whether the 2 and 1/2 year olds should have been presented under saddle is another story!!
I am sure I will get left on for my comments but again, only my opinion