draftxfan
New User
I keep thinking of this photo of Edgar Prado's skull cap: https://mobile.twitter.com/shealeparoux/status/557536530621661184
I keep thinking of this photo of Edgar Prado's skull cap: https://mobile.twitter.com/shealeparoux/status/557536530621661184
I keep thinking of this photo of Edgar Prado's skull cap: https://mobile.twitter.com/shealeparoux/status/557536530621661184
Wow. Just, wow. Here's a meme I made that you can post online to help spread the word. It shows a broken KEP hat compared to a broken Troxel which are about the cheapest you can get in the US. Feel free to share! https://imgflip.com/i/oai7z
For certification X amount of helmets are required to release a batch of 1600 helmets, this is reevaluated yearly and per batch.
Only the snell standard does random sample testing, Snell buy 2% of the helmets of what the factory send onto the market.
The manufacturer buys serialised stickers, and the number from each of these stickers are sent into snell so they know how much the factory have. If there are any fails in that batch, that batch is then recalled.
KEP do not have the SNELL standard.
FAACTS ABOUT MRS. ANDREA SMITH'S HELMET AND KEP ITALIA'S REACTION.
So, assuming Mrs. Smith is not liar, we suggest one of a few things:
. that Mrs. Smith fell on a harder ground than she thinks, or that she fell in a more powerful way than she recalls;
. that Mrs. Smiths hat was not properly fastened (this is a very common situation unfortunately) and that she lost the helmet after she fell. In this case the horse might have stepped on the helmet in its effort to stand up after falling, or that it stood on the helmet in any other way;
Another, and worse, thought came into our mind: that someone might intentionally be mounting up this case with the precise purpose of damaging KEP Italias image. KEP Italia is a growing company and we know for sure that some of our competitors are reacting in a bad way to this, some of them even scaring off kids at shows by telling them stupid and false stories.
6. Conclusions.
We are perfectly aware that the social media environment speeds up the travelling of information, and while we are going to take proper actions in order to stop the releasing of false information, we are committed into turning this into a unique opportunity to talk about safety. We invite all of you who have shared posts regarding Mrs. Smith broken helmet, to also share our response in order to let riders have all the data they need to build their own opinion.
We are also informing the persons sharing false information that they should stop defaming our company and that they will have to assume responsibility for the consequences of what they say.
Thank you for reading.
If it's any consolation, my new Gatehouse HS1 skull says the same ie 'Some reasonably foreseeable impacts may exceed this helmet's capability to protect against severe injury or death'. Probably a standard disclaimer, but not a very cheerful one.Interestingly I had a look inside my Gatehouse Air Rider vented hat at the weekend and there is a warning along the lines of 'this helmet may not protect against death or injury from reasonably predicatable accidents' or similar words to that effect.
However, it makes sense that a skull helmet is going to have fewer weak points than a vented helmet, plus it hasn't got a fixed peak. My HS1, (this is my second one), is cool and comfortable to wear, albeit not very flattering.
They have a win a hat competition in FB. I asked if its the same model as this one.
They have gone in about it is meant to break up on slow impact. When I asked about secondary knock they said horses rarely tread on a rider at slow speed, and the hat would react differently in a high speed accident
They have links to something about head injuries.
I really would like to know if any other manufacturers agree with their statement
this video is really interesting too, how a charles owen helmet is made
http://horsetalk.co.nz/2015/05/26/video-how-riding-helmet-made/#axzz3gmnmBirv