Dizzle
Well-Known Member
People are entitled to feel guilty after an accident, even if it wasn't their fault.
Moomin, the horses owner has the right not to feel uncomfortable or fearful. Owner's are often held responsible for any fall a rider may suffer. if the owner doesn't want to take that risk then their feelings are equally as important and they should not be ridiculed for them. It is a nice part of being human that we feel protective of a mother/unborn child and not something sinister.
People are entitled to feel guilty after an accident, even if it wasn't their fault.
How is it a different kettle of fish?
By telling someone they can't ride your horse, simply because they are pregnant (I am not talking about whether you actually feel they can handle the horse or not), you are making a decision for them on theirs and their unborn baby's safety, because you feel it is a risk. Dr's currently recommend that pregnant women AVOID horse riding, and AVOID alcohol. Therefore, why would you make the decision that riding your horse is too dangerous for a pregnant woman, but not make a decision on whether you would pour her a glass of alcohol? That's the point I am trying to make. Is it a case of pick and choose? That glass of wine may well harm the baby, or it may not. Similarly, riding may cause a fall, harming the baby, or it may not.
Surely that is completely down to the woman to make that decision?
As I say, fair enough if there are reasons behind not allowing someone on your horse - ie, they have never ridden before and don't fully appreciate the dangers, or you know that the person is not capable of handling that particular horse etc. But if someone has regularly ridden your horse, knows what the horse is like and capable of, and is a competent rider themselves, then why should anyone but themselves make that judgement on whether they should continue to ride or not?
Because one of the risks of riding a horse is falling off, this and the possible consequences are much worse than that of drinking a glass of wine. I am not saying I would tell the pregnant lady she cannot ride full stop, I have no right do to that. What I do have the right to do, is not allow her to ride MY horse as I would feel the risks and possible consequences of those risks (miscarriage/injury to baby and or rider and as one poster put, a court case), are not in my best interests. It is not just the feelings/rights pregnant lady that has to be considered, or her unborn child, but also the father of the child surely?
I would however rider MY horse if I were pregnant, but I would not put a friend in the difficult position of asking to ride their horse whilst with child. All my opinions and I don't see where I am dictating what someone must/mustn't do. You make it sound like any pregnant lady has the right to ride any horse they like, regardless of who owns it! A bit melodramatic, yes, but hey ho..
No I am not in the slightest bit suggesting that. What I am saying is that of course any owner has the right to tell someone they aren't riding their horse, for any reason they like. HOWEVER, I personally would not stop a pregnant woman from riding my horse simply because they were pregnant. That is her choice, her risk. Just like it is when any non pregnant person gets on my horse. My instructor is schooling my horse for me whilst I am pregnant. I made him fully aware of what she is like before he got on her the first time. He is now fully accustomed to her, and how she can be. If he fell off (god forbid) and broke a leg, and was off work for six weeks with no wage, then yes, I would feel very bad for him, but I wouldn't feel guilt, because he knows it is a risky business getting on in the first place, and he knows what my mare is like. And he is also a very capable rider. Therefore he has made that judgement himself. I don't see it any different whatsoever for a pregnant woman (who, in the main part, are pretty sane too ;-) ).
With regards the father - I think I have pointed out a number of times that the father's wishes are the only other wish I would take into consideration.
But you aren't responsible for the unborn child - she is.
I would be seriously offended if someone told me, as a pregnant woman, what I can and can't do. (Not having a go here, that's just the way I view it as a currently pregnant woman - and possibly a very hormonal one too ;-) )
OP, out of interest, are you all going to stop her from mucking out, handling the horses, poo picking, grooming and doing all the jobs she may have been doing to help out?
So she's a novice rider. That puts a very different slant on things then I'd say. The question really should be; would you allow a novice rider to ride your green youngster and my answer would therefore have been, no I wouldn't.but i would feel responsible! and that may be daft but i can't change that i know i would blame myself if something happened, and TBH I'm sure her boyfriend and family would blame me too as she's only 18 and I'm the 'adult' (allegedly lol). She has only just got back into riding and has ridden my cob a handful of times and my big mare once. didn't really click with my big girl and the cob is still a bit green, too much of a risk IMO.
I can understand what you are saying about people making decisions for you just because you are pregnant , if she had been riding longer and cob wasn't so green i may have felt differently.
I don't have any issues with pregnant women riding, just not my horses
I doubt she will want to do the work without the 'payment' of riding, and i understand that.
So she's a novice rider. That puts a very different slant on things then I'd say. The question really should be; would you allow a novice rider to ride your green youngster and my answer would therefore have been, no I wouldn't.
And that is what I am shocked at...
No, I wouldn't.
I'm 34 weeks pregnant and stopped riding months ago as I PERSONALLY don't feel that it is an acceptable risk. Therefore, because of MY feelings on the subject, I would hardly then hand the reins over to another pregnant lady. I'd feel awful if something happened.
If someone wanted to ride their own horse, then that is completely their decision which doesn't need any agreement or consent from me. It's totally up to them and I don't judge.
By giving permission you are enabling the person to ride the horse, and therefore it would be totally understandable to feel a sense of guilt if they then fell off and lost the baby, doing an activity that was only open to them because of YOUR permission.
I don't really see what's hard to understand about that?
I'm quite shocked at your double standards TBH!
You say its a woman's choice in whether to drink/ride etc. during pregnancy, but won't allow other people to have an opinion on whether they would help her to do these things!
I am totally pro-choice, but would suggest she got her own horse to excercise this 'choice' on......
That's exactly how I feel and I'm one who avidly does not describe myself as a feminist lol! I do find this thread one of the most telling threads posted on here for a long time.Yes. Her body, her baby, her choice. My choice is allowing her to have a choice.
I am totally pro-choice, but would suggest she got her own horse to excercise this 'choice' on......
That's exactly how I feel and I'm one who avidly does not describe myself as a feminist lol! I do find this thread one of the most telling threads posted on here for a long time.