Aaaarrrgghhhh - Pedigree dogs programme....

Acolyte

Well-Known Member
Joined
27 November 2005
Messages
7,969
Visit site
Awwww I was at the CKCS championship show..... it smelt! I am looking out for my mum now
grin.gif
 

kirstyhen

Well-Known Member
Joined
14 January 2006
Messages
19,737
Location
In limbo...
mysite.wanadoo-members.co.uk
[ QUOTE ]
I prefer the bassett from 60 years ago although it does look like a Dachshound

[/ QUOTE ]

But I don't believe (waits to be told she's wrong) the breed standard has changed. It's peoples perception of the breed standard, and also the sepration of working and showing people and the decline of the dog actually being used for what it was bred for.
Our working cockers are still to the breed standard (sort of!!), but no judge would ever place them.
Yet the IWS we have is perfect to the breed standard and also perfectly designed to do what he was bred for.
 

sade1986

Well-Known Member
Joined
5 February 2007
Messages
332
Location
Essex
Visit site
Sorry, i don't know much more about it than that but i have seen some nasty damage to tails, although not first hand. I used to be completly against docking, but after seeing some of the damage to undocked working dogs i changed my view but disagree with it for cosmetic purposes.
 

muffinino

Well-Known Member
Joined
11 August 2005
Messages
5,065
Location
off to Hell in a hangingbasket
Visit site
I have to say, Danny is one of the fugliest animals I have ever seen. Poor mite could barely waddle around or breath.

I agree about it being down to breed standards. Judges have to place animals that conform to them and therefore you get squashed faces, weak back ends, hereditary problems.

The narrator's simpering but self righteous voice is getting on my nerves!
 

Sooty

Well-Known Member
Joined
19 April 2004
Messages
22,480
Location
Brussels sprout country
Visit site
Docking was originally introduced to identify working dogs, which were not subject to taxation. A dog's tail is the end of its spine, and it uses it as a rudder, as well as to express itself. Some working dogs are still docked (and docking enthusiasts will tell you it is necessary), and some are not, including Retrievers, who have a long coat and work in as much rough as Spaniels. Go figure, as they say. I can see no reason to dock pet breeds, yet many are. In America they also go in for ear pricking, which means cutting the ears of breeds like Dobermans and Great Danes to get them to stand up. Of the two practices, this probably has less impact on the dog's overall health, as many active docked animals suffer from leg joint problems as a result of balance difficulties. Docking is still carried out by vets.
 

kirstyhen

Well-Known Member
Joined
14 January 2006
Messages
19,737
Location
In limbo...
mysite.wanadoo-members.co.uk
[ QUOTE ]
I think It's silly to have it done if the dog isn't ever actually going to work though!

[/ QUOTE ]

But then puppies don't always have their destinys mapped out from the moment they are born
grin.gif

They have to be done before 3 days, and working owners won't buy undocked dogs, whereas pet owners will buy a docked dog.
All our cockers are docked, and never have a problem with wagging or balance! They are perfectly happy, except for the one who wasn't docked short enough, when it comes to the working season, his tail explodes with infection, so much so his days often get limited. Then he is even more p!ssed off!!!
grin.gif
 

joeanne

Well-Known Member
Joined
25 May 2008
Messages
5,322
Location
Cornwall
Visit site
[ QUOTE ]
IMO a working dog should be docked so there is no risk of their tails being caught and ripped or broken badly. A pet dog shouldn't be docked. But that 's just my opinion

[/ QUOTE ]

agreed, working dogs in certain cases do need to have a docked tail, our springers were purchased as pets only so we hunted high and low to find two with tails.
pugs can be traced back to 50 individuals???????
thats shocking! thats puts limited gene pool into a whole new perspective!
 

MooMoo

Well-Known Member
Joined
10 August 2008
Messages
2,969
Location
North Wiltshire
Visit site
Oops, sorry. I meant when you asked about what kind of injuries. But then by the time i posted it loads of others had beat me to it.

It was just that i knew someone with a working springer spaniel that hadnt had enough of her tail docked and if she caught it on anything it squirted blood. Poor thing!
 

Acolyte

Well-Known Member
Joined
27 November 2005
Messages
7,969
Visit site
[ QUOTE ]
[ QUOTE ]
IMO a working dog should be docked so there is no risk of their tails being caught and ripped or broken badly. A pet dog shouldn't be docked. But that 's just my opinion

[/ QUOTE ]

agreed, working dogs in certain cases do need to have a docked tail, our springers were purchased as pets only so we hunted high and low to find two with tails.
pugs can be traced back to 50 individuals???????
thats shocking! thats puts limited gene pool into a whole new perspective!

[/ QUOTE ]

And cant thoroughbreds be traced back to three stallions?
 

Shilasdair

Patting her thylacine
Joined
26 March 2007
Messages
23,686
Location
Daemon from Hades
Visit site
[ QUOTE ]
Docking was originally introduced to identify working dogs, which were not subject to taxation. A dog's tail is the end of its spine, and it uses it as a rudder, as well as to express itself. Some working dogs are still docked (and docking enthusiasts will tell you it is necessary), and some are not, including Retrievers, who have a long coat and work in as much rough as Spaniels. Go figure, as they say. I can see no reason to dock pet breeds, yet many are. In America they also go in for ear pricking, which means cutting the ears of breeds like Dobermans and Great Danes to get them to stand up. Of the two practices, this probably has less impact on the dog's overall health, as many active docked animals suffer from leg joint problems as a result of balance difficulties. Docking is still carried out by vets.

[/ QUOTE ]

Thanks, Soots.
I know that heavy horses used to be docked as they suffered crushed vertebrae if/when they got their tails trapped in the workings...
I couldn't think of a way that a longer tail would be prone to injury in a working dog (but then, all I know are sheepdogs and maybe gundogs). Is it due to injury or disease that they are docked?
And another question (I did warn you all I know nothing about dogs) - if a white boxer is deaf, can it not be neutered and rehomed as a pet, rather than culled - as it will still be effectively removed from the gene pool?
S
grin.gif
 

_April_

Well-Known Member
Joined
7 September 2006
Messages
7,095
Visit site
I saw an injury to a working dog's tail once and it was really quite nasty... I guess they think prevention is better than cure.

I didn't think the docking experience looked that bad for the puppies, although they were so small - poor little mites

I am totally anti hunting btw - my minimal experience is from having a family who shoot and working as a vet nurse!
 

joeanne

Well-Known Member
Joined
25 May 2008
Messages
5,322
Location
Cornwall
Visit site
[ QUOTE ]
[ QUOTE ]
[ QUOTE ]
IMO a working dog should be docked so there is no risk of their tails being caught and ripped or broken badly. A pet dog shouldn't be docked. But that 's just my opinion

[/ QUOTE ]

agreed, working dogs in certain cases do need to have a docked tail, our springers were purchased as pets only so we hunted high and low to find two with tails.
pugs can be traced back to 50 individuals???????
thats shocking! thats puts limited gene pool into a whole new perspective!

[/ QUOTE ]

And cant thoroughbreds be traced back to three stallions?

[/ QUOTE ]

yes maybe but not 50 individuals as a whole, and certainly not in the last 20 years! tb's at least had many mares to dilute the gene's a bit!
 

jacks_mum

Well-Known Member
Joined
25 March 2006
Messages
17,503
Location
Somewhere else
Visit site
Of course it can Shils but if the breeders won't do that and can find a vet to cull them then that's what will happen. Having said that, our rescue centres are full to the brim already without adding pedigree's that haven't 'made the grade'.
frown.gif
 

kirstyhen

Well-Known Member
Joined
14 January 2006
Messages
19,737
Location
In limbo...
mysite.wanadoo-members.co.uk
[ QUOTE ]
Some working dogs are still docked (and docking enthusiasts will tell you it is necessary), and some are not, including Retrievers, who have a long coat and work in as much rough as Spaniels.

[/ QUOTE ]

Not true. A retrievers job is to retrieve shot game from the open field, a springer/cockers job is to flush the game from the rough into the open to be shot. Hence the reason for docking the dogs which flush and not retrievers like labs etc. Game which landed in the rough would usually have a flushing dog sent in to retrieve it.
Also working dogs which have never been docked, are bred to have shortish, thick tails, dogs which are bred to be docked can have anything stuck to their backside. Usually long and whiplike, and perfect for being ripped to shreds, which is a hideous injury.
 

Sooty

Well-Known Member
Joined
19 April 2004
Messages
22,480
Location
Brussels sprout country
Visit site
To the Boxer question - yes. White boxers are culled not only due to deafness, but because they are not KC 'approved'. My old vet refused to put a white deaf boxer to sleep and kept it for 12 years. As I said, working dogs were originally docked for tax purposes, not for health purposes, so I do wonder about that whole argument. I have lived in the country and owned dogs for over 30 years, and have never had a tail injury. I know some thin-tailed breeds such as greyhounds are prone to them, but they are not docked on a routine basis.
 

Shilasdair

Patting her thylacine
Joined
26 March 2007
Messages
23,686
Location
Daemon from Hades
Visit site
[ QUOTE ]
[ QUOTE ]
[ QUOTE ]
IMO a working dog should be docked so there is no risk of their tails being caught and ripped or broken badly. A pet dog shouldn't be docked. But that 's just my opinion

[/ QUOTE ]

agreed, working dogs in certain cases do need to have a docked tail, our springers were purchased as pets only so we hunted high and low to find two with tails.
pugs can be traced back to 50 individuals???????
thats shocking! thats puts limited gene pool into a whole new perspective!

[/ QUOTE ]

And cant thoroughbreds be traced back to three stallions?

[/ QUOTE ]

Four stallions...although originally the stud book wasn't closed as it is today...and the idea of not allowing AI is supposedly to ensure greater genetic diversity.
S
grin.gif
 

icestationzebra

Well-Known Member
Joined
18 November 2004
Messages
5,378
Location
Leicestershire
Visit site
It just makes me feel sad that there are so many unwanted dogs festering in dogs homes across the country and people continue to breed these unhealthy and sometimes deformed dogs! And of course there are people queuing up to buy them which personally I cannot get my head around
crazy.gif
 

Sooty

Well-Known Member
Joined
19 April 2004
Messages
22,480
Location
Brussels sprout country
Visit site
Our Boxer cross has a very sturdy tail. Greyhounds are not bred to be docked (and it is highly unlikely any breed's tail would change over the short period of time that docking has been a practice - 100 years or so? Why would it?) and they have very thin tails.
 

kanter

Well-Known Member
Joined
30 August 2007
Messages
586
Visit site
[ QUOTE ]

And another question (I did warn you all I know nothing about dogs) - if a white boxer is deaf, can it not be neutered and rehomed as a pet, rather than culled - as it will still be effectively removed from the gene pool?
S
grin.gif


[/ QUOTE ]

I believe they are more difficult to train (recall etc), and obviously may not be aware of danger (traffic etc) though have heard of some successfully trained using sign language, and also can form successful pair bonds with hearing dogs.
 
Top