Winters100
Well-Known Member
I have been thinking about something and wonder about other opinions.
Today I went to see a horse who was purchased about a month ago by the cousin of one of my friends. They asked me to go because they were aware that I had previously known the horse, and they claim that it was mis-sold as suitable for a novice. I went because I was quite surprised that they had problems. My history with the horse was that I was lent it for about 6 weeks when starting riding again after a serious accident, and to me he seemed to be a perfect gentleman, albeit needing some encouragement to be active, and absolutely safe for a novice. I would have imagined that any complaints would have been that he would grind to a halt if not given proper aids, but the new owners claim that the horse "bolts" and bucks.
When I saw how he is now being kept the problem was obvious. They have him at a smart competition yard, in 24 hours a day apart from being ridden / put on the horse walker, while he was previously at the yard where I keep mine, not nearly as smart, and with worse facilities for humans, but turned out dawn until dusk in a pack. The new owner is a novice, so the ridden work is gentle, but he is eating more hard food than mine do in relatively hard work.
I saw the "bolt" and it is more what I would describe as 'going a bit faster than the rider would like for a few steps'. I did not see any "bucks", but my friend told me privately that she would describe them more as 'skips', and that it has only happened a couple of times.
The new owners are nice people, and willing to take advice. I believe that I can help them, they will hopefully move the horse to our yard, there are no boxes free, but he can live out for the time being with some of YO's horses, and for sure before winter something will come available.
This got me thinking though, these people, nice as they are, were so quick to say that the sellers were to blame, when this is just not the case. If they had not by chance had a contact who knew the horse they probably would have kept saying that. I know that some horses are genuinely mis-sold, but I wonder how many do not work out because of changes in how they are kept, or just because the buyer made a mistake. It has made me realise that if I sold any of mine (which I hope never happens) then I would be really reluctant to describe even my saint of a schoolmistress as 'suitable for a novice', because even she was a little enthusiastic when I first rode her after some weeks off when I had covid. Don't get me wrong, she did not do anything, just was a bit more 'full of beans' than usual, which is the case with this horse. I used to think that buying was full of difficulties, now I see that selling is the same!
Today I went to see a horse who was purchased about a month ago by the cousin of one of my friends. They asked me to go because they were aware that I had previously known the horse, and they claim that it was mis-sold as suitable for a novice. I went because I was quite surprised that they had problems. My history with the horse was that I was lent it for about 6 weeks when starting riding again after a serious accident, and to me he seemed to be a perfect gentleman, albeit needing some encouragement to be active, and absolutely safe for a novice. I would have imagined that any complaints would have been that he would grind to a halt if not given proper aids, but the new owners claim that the horse "bolts" and bucks.
When I saw how he is now being kept the problem was obvious. They have him at a smart competition yard, in 24 hours a day apart from being ridden / put on the horse walker, while he was previously at the yard where I keep mine, not nearly as smart, and with worse facilities for humans, but turned out dawn until dusk in a pack. The new owner is a novice, so the ridden work is gentle, but he is eating more hard food than mine do in relatively hard work.
I saw the "bolt" and it is more what I would describe as 'going a bit faster than the rider would like for a few steps'. I did not see any "bucks", but my friend told me privately that she would describe them more as 'skips', and that it has only happened a couple of times.
The new owners are nice people, and willing to take advice. I believe that I can help them, they will hopefully move the horse to our yard, there are no boxes free, but he can live out for the time being with some of YO's horses, and for sure before winter something will come available.
This got me thinking though, these people, nice as they are, were so quick to say that the sellers were to blame, when this is just not the case. If they had not by chance had a contact who knew the horse they probably would have kept saying that. I know that some horses are genuinely mis-sold, but I wonder how many do not work out because of changes in how they are kept, or just because the buyer made a mistake. It has made me realise that if I sold any of mine (which I hope never happens) then I would be really reluctant to describe even my saint of a schoolmistress as 'suitable for a novice', because even she was a little enthusiastic when I first rode her after some weeks off when I had covid. Don't get me wrong, she did not do anything, just was a bit more 'full of beans' than usual, which is the case with this horse. I used to think that buying was full of difficulties, now I see that selling is the same!