Ifmpw
Well-Known Member
Does she own any of her own horses though or are the all provided by sponsors ?
But as a group we have condemned the treatment of big lick horses, Arab showing and endurance -we have long championed for change.I’ve not really commented and have thought long and hard about it all. CDJ’s biggest crime is being in the public domain as an advocate for ethical training. If we then find out she’s not what we thought we feel cheated on. I think that’s one part of it.
Then there’s the undoubted animal abuse. That’s another part. Then there’s the speaking up in front of an Olympian who abuses you or your animal. That’s another part!
Then there’s the timing which I think is genius if your intention is to highlight abuse behind the scenes of the equestrian world.
Then there’s the inevitable trauma to the individual for the circus caused by all this attention.
It’s so many things. I hope horses are valued and treated better as a result. That’s my main hope.
I am a yard owner and no it would not.Out of interest, if you were a YO and had a livery that was very outwardly posting on social media in support of CDJ along the lines of ‘she’s still the queen of dressage and I support her’ ‘do any of you condemning her consider yourself riders truly when you couldn’t even get round an intro’ - would that be enough of a reason to be given notice to leave the yard, in your opinion?
most top level horses are getting a significant amount of intervention
I am angry for the calculated way she had duped us
I am angry that she thinks this was the right thing to do
Someone posted up above, she wasn't sorry when we didn't know about this and i agree
I hope that others do speak out - the poor horses couldn't.
Even if the complaint is thrown out by the FEI, the truth is thankfully out in the public domain.From the Telegraph article detailing the legal side of the Dutch complainant's case. He is going down the line of the FEI welfare requirements to report any 'abuse' very quickly after it takes place.
---------------------------------
He then referenced FEI regulations stating reports of potential cruelty should be reported “without delay”. “This obligation to file a protest ‘without delay’ is precisely aimed at preventing animal suffering,” he adds. “Failure by the complaining client to comply with this reporting obligation in a timely manner may result in the alleged complaint of horse abuse against Charlotte Dujardin being declared inadmissible or the sanctions to be imposed remaining limited.
----------------------------------------
The Lucy Higginson Telegraph article she talks about the impact of the CDJ case on Olympic particpation, stating a lot that has been discussed here already.
----------------------------------
Further, keeping equestrian sports – which are costly to run, struggle with diversity and are largely contested by a narrow pool of nations – in the Games remains an ongoing challenge
-----------------------------------
She also mentions the horse welfare charters that have been brought in over here by British Equestrian
Also for completeness is the link to the WHW statement on CDJ issue. It is a brief amount and reflects what Roly Owers said in a SKYNews interview yesterday afternoon which was very balanced.
World Horse Welfare statement in response to Charlotte Dujardin's provisional suspension - World Horse Welfare
Equine welfare charity World Horse Welfare release statement in response to Charlotte Dujardin's provisional suspension.www.worldhorsewelfare.org
The system breaks horses, even maybe twenty years ago the average life expectancy for a sport horse in Germans was 7 years. Is it any better than racing? At least most of their early retirees do get rehomed, though I think we underestimate just how much physical and behavioural/emotional damage they really have. Rehabbing for 6 weeks in a Pessoa ain't helping. We have an absolute epidemic of lameness that can be medicated to the nth degree while not contravening rules. This HAS to be looked at as we go forwards, and the defence is NOT that we owe these horses comfort and pain relief therefore it's ethical. It might be ethical for each horse, at the time, but systemically it is horrific and will give PETA so much ammo if they really understood what passes for normal in equestrian sport.
Do we think she's an aberration? That there are no other hypocrites out there? We are all being duped and people like me get a kicking when we indicate the signs which to us mean the rider is using the horse as a tool. We do see the not so rare chink showing the dark side but it seems so many find it easier just to see the nicey nicey stuff. The industry stinks, it makes all this absolutely endemic.
I know I'm at the fluffy end of things compared to so many, but riding horses in compression is harmful to them, emotionally and physically, yet it is the 100% accepted modern way of training, and probably over 90% of any horse being competed in any sport is compressed at the front end to their detriment. I know it's ridiculously ambitious, and too high a bar, sadly, but we need a BIG shift towards understanding what horses really need to stay sound and happy. We have barely chipped at the edges, and I give kudos to Charlotte for her small part in that, but it's a drop in the ocean and now seen clearly for what it was, lip service, at least in part. There's still a fundamental misunderstanding, in part because it's easier than actually dealing with the "should we be riding them, if so how is the best possible way to mitigate harm?" question which will make all competitive riders, and many non competitive, stop short if they were really to think about it.
I'm trying not to yell at my OH as the Strictly revelations unfold (and I do think those played a part in the timing of this release, as this happened in the UK even though the lawyer is Dutch). We've always loved Gio and my OHs immediate reaction to Amanda Abington was extremely negative whereas I was very much of the opinion "believe the victim" or at least keep space for it to be true. He's not made any comment on the fact that it's looking highly likely he was wrong, yet she's been, and is still being, bombarded by death threats (not remotely by him I hasten to add!!).
The more sensitive amongst us are the canaries in the coal mine, and I'm utterly fed up with them (us?) being ignored.
As per she could just POSSIBLY emerge from this, after a suitable period of contemplation, and absolute hero for changing the outlook of many towards how we treat horses. There are more gamekeepers turned poachers (or is it the other way around?!) out there than we realise, and they can contribute more in some cases, or rather be more effective than those who have long campaigned for things.
Lets wait and see what else comes out, but right here and right now in order to answer your first question - is she an aberration ? then yes, especially as she has long held us to believe she was an ambassador for the respect and kindness of her training. That is what is leading the vitriol - some other professional horse riders - whilst their would have been an outcry - we in truth would have not been surprised. For CDJ to be the one brutalizing's a horse, and then we are already talking about forgiveness well words just fail me.The system breaks horses, even maybe twenty years ago the average life expectancy for a sport horse in Germans was 7 years. Is it any better than racing? At least most of their early retirees do get rehomed, though I think we underestimate just how much physical and behavioural/emotional damage they really have. Rehabbing for 6 weeks in a Pessoa ain't helping. We have an absolute epidemic of lameness that can be medicated to the nth degree while not contravening rules. This HAS to be looked at as we go forwards, and the defence is NOT that we owe these horses comfort and pain relief therefore it's ethical. It might be ethical for each horse, at the time, but systemically it is horrific and will give PETA so much ammo if they really understood what passes for normal in equestrian sport.
Do we think she's an aberration? That there are no other hypocrites out there? We are all being duped and people like me get a kicking when we indicate the signs which to us mean the rider is using the horse as a tool. We do see the not so rare chink showing the dark side but it seems so many find it easier just to see the nicey nicey stuff. The industry stinks, it makes all this absolutely endemic.
I know I'm at the fluffy end of things compared to so many, but riding horses in compression is harmful to them, emotionally and physically, yet it is the 100% accepted modern way of training, and probably over 90% of any horse being competed in any sport is compressed at the front end to their detriment. I know it's ridiculously ambitious, and too high a bar, sadly, but we need a BIG shift towards understanding what horses really need to stay sound and happy. We have barely chipped at the edges, and I give kudos to Charlotte for her small part in that, but it's a drop in the ocean and now seen clearly for what it was, lip service, at least in part. There's still a fundamental misunderstanding, in part because it's easier than actually dealing with the "should we be riding them, if so how is the best possible way to mitigate harm?" question which will make all competitive riders, and many non competitive, stop short if they were really to think about it.
I'm trying not to yell at my OH as the Strictly revelations unfold (and I do think those played a part in the timing of this release, as this happened in the UK even though the lawyer is Dutch). We've always loved Gio and my OHs immediate reaction to Amanda Abington was extremely negative whereas I was very much of the opinion "believe the victim" or at least keep space for it to be true. He's not made any comment on the fact that it's looking highly likely he was wrong, yet she's been, and is still being, bombarded by death threats (not remotely by him I hasten to add!!).
The more sensitive amongst us are the canaries in the coal mine, and I'm utterly fed up with them (us?) being ignored.
As per she could just POSSIBLY emerge from this, after a suitable period of contemplation, and absolute hero for changing the outlook of many towards how we treat horses. There are more gamekeepers turned poachers (or is it the other way around?!) out there than we realise, and they can contribute more in some cases, or rather be more effective than those who have long campaigned for things.
it was always underplayed but it was well known locally that Valegro was a regular visitor to the local equine therapy centre….
Lets wait and see what else comes out, but right here and right now in order to answer your first question - is she an aberration ? then yes, especially as she has long held us to believe she was an ambassador for the respect and kindness of her training. That is what is leading the vitriol - some other professional horse riders - whilst their would have been an outcry - we in truth would have not been surprised. For CDJ to be the one brutalizing's a horse, and then we are already talking about forgiveness well words just fail me.
Can someone please tell me how you apologize to a horse ? whom is probably now an nightmare to be lunged, approached by a person on the ground, scared of going in a school
A lot of dogs competing in various sports, including my 2, have regular physio/hydro sessions, sometimes they will show a slight tweak which can be resolved ,other times they are just maintenance visits. So that wouldn't be any sort of red flag for me.
It's emotive language used because their way of training, and indeed their livelihood, is under threat. My non-ridden horse hasn't, and won't, be sold or pts just because I don't throw a saddle on her back and jump fences anymore.This is going to be an unpopular opinion, but I'm quite disappointed by this part of Pammy Hutton's response:
'If riding stops; horses are unnecessary; too expensive to keep for pets. Let the cull begin.'
I think this is different. We have all had bad days. But hitting a horse THAT many times..I don’t think she felt a bit bad about it.A question I have been pondering…
Let us assume (for the sake of argument) that her statement is correct. That she had a one off misjudgement and this was a one off bad day(we have all had bad days and done stuff we ain’t to proud of)
What would
A) the reaction from the press etc if she had ‘fessed up then and used it as example of what shouldn’t be done?
And
B) would you personally have thought?
I love this sbloom, for so long how we train horses has been accepted and anyone who puts their head above the parapet and says anything about a training method gets shot down. 'The dressage whip is an extension of your arm' no it's not, its a threat to the horse, as is the lunge whip ( if used in its normal manner, not as per CD). Dog training which I'm more involved in than horses these days is the same, so many people see no harm in yanking on a lead, shutting a dog in a crate etc because they've always done it.The system breaks horses, even maybe twenty years ago the average life expectancy for a sport horse in Germans was 7 years. Is it any better than racing? At least most of their early retirees do get rehomed, though I think we underestimate just how much physical and behavioural/emotional damage they really have. Rehabbing for 6 weeks in a Pessoa ain't helping. We have an absolute epidemic of lameness that can be medicated to the nth degree while not contravening rules. This HAS to be looked at as we go forwards, and the defence is NOT that we owe these horses comfort and pain relief therefore it's ethical. It might be ethical for each horse, at the time, but systemically it is horrific and will give PETA so much ammo if they really understood what passes for normal in equestrian sport.
Do we think she's an aberration? That there are no other hypocrites out there? We are all being duped and people like me get a kicking when we indicate the signs which to us mean the rider is using the horse as a tool. We do see the not so rare chink showing the dark side but it seems so many find it easier just to see the nicey nicey stuff. The industry stinks, it makes all this absolutely endemic.
I know I'm at the fluffy end of things compared to so many, but riding horses in compression is harmful to them, emotionally and physically, yet it is the 100% accepted modern way of training, and probably over 90% of any horse being competed in any sport is compressed at the front end to their detriment. I know it's ridiculously ambitious, and too high a bar, sadly, but we need a BIG shift towards understanding what horses really need to stay sound and happy. We have barely chipped at the edges, and I give kudos to Charlotte for her small part in that, but it's a drop in the ocean and now seen clearly for what it was, lip service, at least in part. There's still a fundamental misunderstanding about how best we can minimise ridden physical forces affecting the horse negatively, as well as day to day management and its issues. This is in part because it's easier than actually dealing with the "should we be riding them, if so how is the best possible way to mitigate harm?" question which will make all competitive riders, and many non competitive, stop short if they were really to think about it.
If I've ever said anything negative, no matter how carefully couched, about CDJ or CH I get shot down in flames. I was shot down in flames when I similarly said things about Anky, Isabel et al back in the day, or and still am about signs a horse is on the forehand/otherwise moving in compensation, even at GP. I'm yelled at about saying how harmful leaning back is, similarly about strong contacts, gripping legs, nagging aiding. When I posted Lockie Phillip's posts yesterday one person accused him of plagiarism, many said that we should "put up" (ie compete with kind training) or "shut up", effectively, and yes, plenty of obfuscation from probably very caring people about the worse ills that are out there, but role models matter.
I'm trying not to yell at my OH as the Strictly revelations unfold (and I do think those played a part in the timing of this release, as this happened in the UK even though the lawyer is Dutch). We've always loved Gio and my OHs immediate reaction to Amanda Abington was extremely negative whereas I was very much of the opinion "believe the victim" or at least keep space for it to be true. He's not made any comment on the fact that it's looking highly likely he was wrong, yet she's been, and is still being, bombarded by death threats (not remotely by him I hasten to add!!).
The more sensitive amongst us are the canaries in the coal mine, and I'm utterly fed up with them (us?) being ignored.
As per she could just POSSIBLY emerge from this, after a suitable period of contemplation, and absolute hero for changing the outlook of many towards how we treat horses. There are more gamekeepers turned poachers (or is it the other way around?!) out there than we realise, and they can contribute more in some cases, or rather be more effective than those who have long campaigned for things.
I can't answer because I don't believe her or anyone claiming that. Beating a horse is never a "misjudgement" or a symptom of a bad day. It's unacceptable, always. I've certainly behaved in ways I'm not always proud of, but I've never beaten a horse on it's legs repeatedly.A question I have been pondering…
Let us assume (for the sake of argument) that her statement is correct. That she had a one off misjudgement and this was a one off bad day(we have all had bad days and done stuff we ain’t to proud of)
What would
A) the reaction from the press etc if she had ‘fessed up then and used it as example of what shouldn’t be done?
And
B) would you personally have thought?
so if that is the story being told, there wasA question I have been pondering…
Let us assume (for the sake of argument) that her statement is correct. That she had a one off misjudgement and this was a one off bad day(we have all had bad days and done stuff we ain’t to proud of)
What would
A) the reaction from the press etc if she had ‘fessed up then and used it as example of what shouldn’t be done?
And
B) would you personally have thought?
It’s all so sad and disturbing, I have a very sad and upset 9yr old that adored Charlotte, she’s always looked up to her and idolised her. she can’t believe it. What do you say to a child to even begin to explain it?
Thank you I will definitely look into these ridersFind more classical/kind role models away from competitive equestrian sport? Have her lusting after being like Anya Beran, Bettina Biolik, Lockie Phillips, perhaps even look at Think Like a Pony and Eat Sleep Ride, and there are probably others. Anyone WAY up on a pedestal is likely to fall, at some point, and that is a life lesson. Look beyond the bling and the PR.
^^^ This is what I fear; already on the Daily Mail thread there have been "all horse riders are the same" remarks, which I have replied to. To coin a phrase, we ain't seen nuffin yet". I am very much afraid there is going to be a huge backlash on account of CDJ's actions.This is a sad day for equestrianism. Look at the top comment on the daily mail and you’ll see that riding horses to ‘dance’ is being compared to circuses.
Animals in circuses is beyond the pale these days and I think society is moving towards this view for riding horses.
Dressage was the last bastion of ‘clean’ public competitive riding because it didn’t involve the risks to the horse of racing, jumping and eventing. Now the world thinks everyone in dressage trains like that video.
The backlash and societal judgement against riders is going to be massive and it’s only just started. Watch this space: horse riding is in big big trouble as an activity.
Thank you I will definitely look into these riders
I had wondered if she’d have gotten a better reaction just getting on the horse, rather than what she was doing
I have about as much respect for PH as I had for CDJ before this week - which is to say, not a lot. She isn’t someone who I would consider progressive in terms of horse welfare. I too was disappointed- though not surprised - by her responses to this situation.This is going to be an unpopular opinion, but I'm quite disappointed by this part of Pammy Hutton's response:
'If riding stops; horses are unnecessary; too expensive to keep for pets. Let the cull begin.'
I don't actually think that this is true, I think that there are many people who care about their horses deeply to the point that it goes beyond riding. I know lots of people with non-ridden horses and ponies who don't treat or view them any differently than their ridden steeds, they get a lot out of joy out of caring for them and doing groundwork activities, just watching them being horses.
I think that anyone who would immediately kill their horse when they are no longer 'useful' is part of the problem. Yes I know that horses are very expensive to keep, but so are many other animals, especially when they reach old age and need medications and extra vet care. Taking on that responsibility is a choice as soon as you purchase an animal and become their guardian.
I would argue that people who would cull their horses if they couldn't ride them anymore, didn't deserve them in the first place.