McGrools
Well-Known Member
Great interview by Mick Fitzgerald! Well done Mick xx
I'm quoting your post but not specifically aiming the reply at you any more than ycbm and minesadouble who agree with you.
....
I cannot see it is defensible. Not just poor PR it showcases a whole attitude.
Why does the horse look in such poor condition?
I cannot speak for minesadouble or ycbm .
I have 3 times had a dog be pts on the operating table. I have not asked for the body to be returned or individual cremation, I do not want the ashes back, although I have asked for the collar and lead. As soon as the animal is dead , it's gone. Our dogs showed me that on the day that we had a 15 yr old Lab bitch pts at home, because she was terrified of the vets' surgery, having had to stay overnight previously. Vet did the deed with the Lab in front of the fire, with the other dogs out of the way. Then we let the other dogs in to see what had happened. They trampled all over the body, as if it were a rug, trying to get to talk to the vet. They would never have trampled on her when she was alive but a couple of minutes later, at most, and they knew that she wasn't there.
I, too have held horses to be shot, I usually go into the house for the winching, because I really don't want that to be my last memory of the horse - that certainly isn't a dignified/respectful process.
I wouldn't have sat on the dead horse, nor do I think that anyone else should but that is because I think of the owner, rather than because I think it is intrinsically wrong to sit on a dead horse. It is pretty obvious from the photo that the trainer was showing off to someone and that most definitely does make his actions wrong on that day.
I must admit that I am more concerned about living horses being treated properly than dead ones. It makes me very cross when I read on here about people riding horses when they know the tack doesn't fit, because they can't get an appointment with a saddle fitter. I would rather get het up about that tbh. But if my horse was in training with GE, I would be moving it pdq, because of the attitude, rather than because of the action, iyswim.
I have seen dead horse before and racehorses but the one in that photo looks poor not fit.It's racing fit and animals "deflate" when the life force leaves them.
This horse, bought direct from training and still with his auction number on, would have looked even worse than that dead.
View attachment 67025
.
I have seen dead horse before and racehorses but the one in that photo looks poor not fit.
His staff may be secretly hoping the arrogant twerk gets his comeuppenceA fine, even a hefty one, is IMO, not the way to go here. He has some wealthy owners so it wouldnt impact on him in the way it would a smaller trainer. He needs a ban, although again, it will be his staff who will suffer the consequences
Mr ship though made some pretty horrific accusations on that forum and no one seems to be pulling that thread.What's the LR?
I'm not a member of, but am browsing, a racing forum which id guess the main audience of is those who gamble. I'm annoyed to see most of them coming out in support of GE and saying how people are unnecessarily outraged and he shouldn't have a ban or horses taken away- not adding well to the image to be honest- shows what most punters think of the horses as well
https://theracingforum.co.uk/forums/topic/gordon-elliott-2/page/12/
The one who's user name has ship in seems especially unpleasant
Hopefully owners will show him the same respect and just move them to ensure they can race and then leave them where they are.Hope the BHA uphold that ban
What will the delightful owner of Tiger Roll, who was so keen to stand by him, do if that ban continues to Cheltenham and Aintree?!
It would be VERY interesting to see the reaction to him if fans were at Cheltenham etc...
If he gets to run at Cheltenham it'll be interesting to see what those interviewing him if he wins say
The owners are permitted to move their horses to run with other trainers under this ruling.Although I applaud the BHA for effectively suspending GE pending investigation it is a pity that the owners and jockeys suffer for his piss poor behaviour IF the IHRB dawdle over making their decision on the outcome and their horses can't race.
Although I applaud the BHA for effectively suspending GE pending investigation it is a pity that the owners and jockeys suffer for his piss poor behaviour IF the IHRB dawdle over making their decision on the outcome and their horses can't race.
There is an echo in here! ?The owners can move their horses and still race them, if they so wish.
He doesn't run his own social media.
The Racing Post has just put out an exclusive interview with Elliot. It is very well written and will be aimed at tempering the flames.
He doesn't run his own social media.
The Racing Post has just put out an exclusive interview with Elliot. It is very well written and will be aimed at tempering the flames.
The owners can move their horses and still race them, if they so wish.