Heavy riders, who should speak out and when*spin off*

FionaM12

Well-Known Member
Joined
9 August 2011
Messages
7,357
Visit site
Soooo.....the question was, originally....who should and when would you tell someone they are too fat to ride?

Seems to me there is no point, because those who ARE told they are too fat to ride don't listen to anyone whose opinion they are not paying for.

Whatever.

Do what you will.....you quite obviously are going to anyway.

The OP did not ask anyone's opinion about riding her horse though. She made it clear she has made her mind up, which is her right to do, whether anyone here agrees or not.

The question asked was (given the example of that poor grey arab :() would you say something in real life?

Your statement "there is no point, because those who ARE told they are too fat to ride don't listen to anyone whose opinion they are not paying for" is a huge generalization, and there's no way any of us know who would take advice and who wouldn't. :confused:
 

Wagtail

Horse servant
Joined
2 December 2010
Messages
14,816
Location
Lincs
Visit site
Soooo.....the question was, originally....who should and when would you tell someone they are too fat to ride?

Seems to me there is no point, because those who ARE told they are too fat to ride don't listen to anyone whose opinion they are not paying for.

Whatever.

Do what you will.....you quite obviously are going to anyway.

I completely agree. It is a very diffcult thing to have to tell someone they are too heavy for their horse. I have done it twice. Once was for a teenager and she has continued to put on weight and continued to ride the pony. I rode him the other day and words cannot describe how awful he felt. :( He is only 10 and feels like a cripple. And another time was when a lady of around the OP's size came to ride my 17.3 ID gelding. I did let her on but quickly asked her to dismount again when I saw the expression on my horse's face. He would have carried her without a doubt, and not complained, but I saw how the saddle sank down into his back and how unbalanced she was. She almost fell off when he went into trot. I told her she was too heavy and unbalanced to ride him, but I put it in as nice a way as I could. Last thing I heard she had bought herself a shire.

IME those people who need telling are the least likely to think they are too heavy, and the most likely to ignore you!
 

Wagtail

Horse servant
Joined
2 December 2010
Messages
14,816
Location
Lincs
Visit site
The OP did not ask anyone's opinion about riding her horse though. She made it clear she has made her mind up, which is her right to do, whether anyone here agrees or not.

The question asked was (given the example of that poor grey arab :() would you say something in real life?

Your statement "there is no point, because those who ARE told they are too fat to ride don't listen to anyone whose opinion they are not paying for" is a huge generalization, and there's no way any of us know who would take advice and who wouldn't. :confused:

I disagree with you there. I think the OP put her own examples up for discussion, including herself. She also gave her own views on them as is the norm for a discussion thread.

To be honest, it should be obvious to anyone who is knowledgable about horses that they are too heavy to ride certain horses. I am quite frankly flabberghasted by some of the pictures on the American site. I am also very sad that the OP does not think that the fact that the vast majority of respondents on this thread have said she is too heavy, is of any concern. :confused:
 

Big Ben

Well-Known Member
Joined
11 October 2012
Messages
914
Location
On the frozen prairies
Visit site
Your statement "there is no point, because those who ARE told they are too fat to ride don't listen to anyone whose opinion they are not paying for" is a huge generalization, and there's no way any of us know who would take advice and who wouldn't. :confused:

I have listened to advice where Willow is concerned, and it would be OH so easy for me to say that I wont ride Ben until I have got down to weight that everyone has agreed is acceptable, but without knowing his weight or mine then we would be playing the guessing from a snapshot game for a long time. There are those who have such a low weight threshold in their mind that I probably would never get there, so I could say flark it all and just stay the size I am.

I do appreciate everyone's thoughts and input, it is always interesting to hear others views.
 

Wagtail

Horse servant
Joined
2 December 2010
Messages
14,816
Location
Lincs
Visit site
I have listened to advice where Willow is concerned, and it would be OH so easy for me to say that I wont ride Ben until I have got down to weight that everyone has agreed is acceptable, but without knowing his weight or mine then we would be playing the guessing from a snapshot game for a long time. There are those who have such a low weight threshold in their mind that I probably would never get there, so I could say flark it all and just stay the size I am.

I do appreciate everyone's thoughts and input, it is always interesting to hear others views.

What does Ben weigh? Around 1300 lb? That would make you 20% of his weight at around 260 lb? That's not an unrealistic target, surely? Of course I am just guessing his ideal weight for a 16 hh big boned animal.
 

devonlass

Well-Known Member
Joined
7 December 2007
Messages
723
Visit site
I find the study someone mentioned earlier in the thread about the % of weight carried and the long term effects very interesting.

It seems to suggest that the 20% rule is a pretty good guide and usually a safe zone.Perhaps as there is so much uncertainty about what is an acceptable weight,sticking to the 20% rule for those in doubt would be a good plan??

Different subject but I am a bit baffled as to how we came around to thinking everyone with a weight problem is an addict or has an eating disorder:confused:

That's quite frankly ludicrous,and a cop out.

The majority of people who are overweight are that way because todays lifestyle and food market has made it easy to be that way.As a nation we are lazy,physically and mentally,and often in need of stress release or 'comfort'.
I say this BTW as someone who has done yo-yo dieting and had weight issues all their adult life before anyone say's I don't understand or can't empathise.

I don't have an eating disorder,and am not addicted.I *could* say i was as an excuse for my weakness but that IMO would completely diminish the importance of those conditions the minority that genuinely do suffer with them.

*Most* people who are overweight are that way because of a choice.It may be a hard choice at times to deny yourself,but it is a choice none the less.
I decided a while ago to change my unhealthy attitude towards food,many others have done the same,many more *could* do the same but choose not to,but it *is* still a choice on their part not a compulsion,(even if some days it feels that way).There is nothing to be gained by kidding ourselves that somehow our eating habits and unhealthy lifestyles are 'not our fault'.
 

FionaM12

Well-Known Member
Joined
9 August 2011
Messages
7,357
Visit site
Different subject but I am a bit baffled as to how we came around to thinking everyone with a weight problem is an addict or has an eating disorder:confused:

That's quite frankly ludicrous,and a cop out.

I see where you're coming from and I agree it's not always due to an eating disorder, but my posts were in response to people who were saying "what's the problem, just eat less" when it's obviously not that simple.

If someone gains some weight, then tackles it successfully, they obviously haven't got an eating disorder. Neither has someone who by choice or ignorance lives on pizzas and chips and has no intention of changing that.

However those people who are miserable about their weight, morbidly obese and simply cannot change their habits despite trying very hard and understanding what they should do about it, clearly have an eating disorder. They have complex psychological issues which cause them to comfort eat, or binge, and they are not helped by people making dismissive comments such as some of those on this thread. Not yours, by the way. :)
 

Littlelegs

Well-Known Member
Joined
25 February 2012
Messages
9,355
Visit site
The thing is with the 20% rule is its 20% of the horses weight when its in peak conditions & a healthy adult. Not when the horse is overweight, unfit, just broken, old etc. And it is that, the maximum, not a case of I'm only 25% of my unfit horses weight so that will be ok for 10 minutes.
 

Flame_

Well-Known Member
Joined
15 November 2007
Messages
8,124
Location
Merseyside
Visit site
Horses break down all the time. Because they were backed too soon, because they do too much schooling, because they don't do enough schooling and learn to use themselves properly, because we feed them imperfect diets, because they are hell bent on breaking their own necks, because we hack them on the roads, etc, etc....

The OP has a point, her horse has a job to do and at the moment its doing it, not unhappily if she's correct. Who's business is it in RL to tell her or anyone else what they should and shouldn't be doing with their horse?
 

Flame_

Well-Known Member
Joined
15 November 2007
Messages
8,124
Location
Merseyside
Visit site
Weight has always been bane on my life, always struggled with it.

After my last child I weighed 15 stones and a size 20, had a young welsh cob and he was inspiration to lose the weight, he was 4 and I wanted to back him, I seemed to happily stop about 10 stone 11lbs and a size 12, I know this sounds fat to you whippets out there but I actually started to look a bit gaunt as I have a big frame. I was SO happy.

I lightly backed my pony (14.2hh)

got the saddler out to fit us a new saddle and the saddler with oodles of sugar coating told me I was too heavy for him.

It was like someone ripped my heart out.

This is so sad. :( A 14.2 welshie should carry an average size woman. Your saddler might be flat wrong, you know. Be really, really honest with yourself, do your research, weigh your horse, take photos of you on the horse to look at and make your own mind up.
 

Wagtail

Horse servant
Joined
2 December 2010
Messages
14,816
Location
Lincs
Visit site
Horses break down all the time. Because they were backed too soon, because they do too much schooling, because they don't do enough schooling and learn to use themselves properly, because we feed them imperfect diets, because they are hell bent on breaking their own necks, because we hack them on the roads, etc, etc....

The OP has a point, her horse has a job to do and at the moment its doing it, not unhappily if she's correct. Who's business is it in RL to tell her or anyone else what they should and shouldn't be doing with their horse?

Whose business is it to tell someone not to starve their horse, or flog their horse, or over feed their horse? Whose business is it to tell someone they can't keep 100 cats in their house, or leave their dogs in hot cars, or back a yearling? Overloading a horse is cruel IMO just like the other things I've listed. Some are worse than others, but still cruel.
 

Wagtail

Horse servant
Joined
2 December 2010
Messages
14,816
Location
Lincs
Visit site
This is so sad. :( A 14.2 welshie should carry an average size woman. Your saddler might be flat wrong, you know. Be really, really honest with yourself, do your research, weigh your horse, take photos of you on the horse to look at and make your own mind up.

agree with this.
 

rhino

Well-Known Member
Joined
19 July 2009
Messages
10,097
Location
Border Reiver
Visit site
The thing is with the 20% rule is its 20% of the horses weight when its in peak conditions & a healthy adult. Not when the horse is overweight, unfit, just broken, old etc. And it is that, the maximum, not a case of I'm only 25% of my unfit horses weight so that will be ok for 10 minutes.

It's not even a rule. It was a figure plucked from a very limited, very small scale, badly written 'study' which only considered the immediate effects i.e. muscular soreness.

They ignored the cumulative damage, the importance of the horse being in good condition, conformation, type, etc (Can you tell I don't think much of it?)

People still like to throw the 20% figure about though :confused:

I spoke out today! I turned down a lovely pony, as I'm too heavy/tall for her.
 

Littlelegs

Well-Known Member
Joined
25 February 2012
Messages
9,355
Visit site
Rhino- I too don't use it as a personal guide. And I too turned down backing a pony at wkend. The height issue I could live with but I didn't feel my weight was suitable. I only mentioned the 20% rule because its being bandied around like its a target weight, rather than the absolute max.
Wagtail- very well put. I assume most of us have read black beauty? Which was inspired by the fact that back then, the attitude was 'who am I to interfere if someone beats or starves a horse to death'.
 

stencilface

High upon a hillside
Joined
28 February 2008
Messages
21,079
Location
Leeds
Visit site
I wanted to speak out when I saw a HUGE lady riding a fine ish welsh D at a show this summer. Her ass flowed over the saddle, and the combined width of her legs was wider than the horse, plainly seen when viewed from the front. However I said nothing, and the judge did the same. Her entourage were scary quite frankly and I don't doubt I would have left with a black eye at best :eek:

I don't know who is supposed to say something really, I would think of myself as being brutally honest with people, but self preservation is also a strong point!! :D
 

FfionWinnie

Well-Known Member
Joined
20 July 2012
Messages
17,021
Location
Scotland
Visit site
When I said target I didn't really mean 20% should be the target more that coldfeet would know if she got back down to 11.11st which was a good weight for her, whether that would be ok for her horse.
 

popeyesno1fan

Well-Known Member
Joined
3 July 2012
Messages
526
Location
Ireland
Visit site
Havnt read all the replies, but the guy on the grey shouldn't be riding him, he's far too big for him. Poor horse. I have a friend thats well on the obese side of big, and he rides, but he always buys big, heavyweight hunters that are really up to carrying weight. He wouldnt dream of sitting up on any horse that wasn't 17hh +, nearly as wide as high, and fit, so up to carrying him. When he leaves the horse out to grass for a break, he'll send them away to get them fit before he'll get up. He thinks its only fair to the horse. Have to agree with him.
 

Big Ben

Well-Known Member
Joined
11 October 2012
Messages
914
Location
On the frozen prairies
Visit site
What does Ben weigh? Around 1300 lb? That would make you 20% of his weight at around 260 lb? That's not an unrealistic target, surely? Of course I am just guessing his ideal weight for a 16 hh big boned animal.


On actual measures Ben stands 16.2hh on 9" of bone, he was bought as 17hh, but I have never found the other 2"

His calculated weight is 1386 pounds, though I really must take him over the weighbridge one of these days to get an actual weight.

So 20% would put him carrying 278 pounds, with rounding, so in reality with in a couple of weeks I will be at 20%, a couple of weeks more to allow for tack etc.

Currently my tack and I will be at 23% of his bodyweight, so for 3% you wanmt to crucify me for walking him for 20 mins 2 or 3 times a week:confused: Or maybe my maths are worse than I thought.

Willow, pictured in OP, is 15.2hh standing on 7.5 inches of bone

She weighs in at 1125, so 28% of her weight, so yes, work to do there.

Emmy is the interesting one, Polish Arab, standing 15hh on 8" of bone and rock hard feet.

According to the weight calculation she comes out at 1096, which I frankly find hard to believe, but she is very short compared to her girth, so nearly 30% for her.

Of all of them though Emmy is most compact, short back, well sprung, and tough as nails Arab, I often see it said that Arabs are better weight carriers so do we do the maths different for them? I have no intention of runing out there and riding her, it is a genuine question.
 

rhino

Well-Known Member
Joined
19 July 2009
Messages
10,097
Location
Border Reiver
Visit site
I often see it said that Arabs are better weight carriers so do we do the maths different for them? I have no intention of runing out there and riding her, it is a genuine question.

Arabs have fewer vertebra than other breeds of horse/pony so if you are looking at the analogy of a suspension bridge, the shorter the bridge the stronger it is. They also tend to have relatively short cannon bones which is often seen as another indicator of a decent weight carrier. It is often said that arabs, like Icelandic horses, have a higher bone density, but as I've yet to see ANY bone densitometry experiments being carried out I'll reserve judgement on that one! ;) :)
 

Wagtail

Horse servant
Joined
2 December 2010
Messages
14,816
Location
Lincs
Visit site
Currently my tack and I will be at 23% of his bodyweight, so for 3% you wanmt to crucify me for walking him for 20 mins 2 or 3 times a week:confused: Or maybe my maths are worse than I thought.

It is not 3% though. Say it's 24 % with tack. The 20% (or one fifth) is 100% of the maximum weght you should be, so in actual fact you are 20% heavier than the heaviest you should be (with tack).

Sounds like you will soon be there though.
 

Cortez

Tough but Fair
Joined
17 January 2009
Messages
15,576
Location
Ireland
Visit site
OP, get a grip. You are too fat to ride these horses. Lose some weight before you get back up. Make sure your horses (all of them, from the Big Fella to the small one) are fit, conditioned and able to carry your weight. THEN go riding. Make life easy (for your dearly beloved horses, and yourself), it's a no-brainer.
 

Big Ben

Well-Known Member
Joined
11 October 2012
Messages
914
Location
On the frozen prairies
Visit site
It is not 3% though. Say it's 24 % with tack. The 20% (or one fifth) is 100% of the maximum weght you should be, so in actual fact you are 20% heavier than the heaviest you should be (with tack).

Sounds like you will soon be there though.


I told you my maths sucked, but why did we go to 24%, I've allowed for rider and tack in my calculations, but yes I do get what you mean...
 

Achinghips

Well-Known Member
Joined
1 December 2009
Messages
3,741
Visit site
This is what the OP asked originally:

Point is, who should speak up, when and how? It is easy to set weight limits for your own horse, and refuse others to ride, but what on their own horse, would you say something to me in real life, if you saw me on Ben, or Willow? Would you speak up if the gentleman posted turned up to ride with you?

......

I believe it is the responsibility of the trainers/sellers to speak up. First and foremost though it is the responsibility of the buyer/rider. In real life I would not speak up to anyone, but would probably stare in disdain. If the gentleman in question turned up to ride with me, I would dismount and leave or if on a lesson, cancel the lesson, dismount and leave, explaining to the instructors my reasons for doing so.

On a forum I would be more vocal, protected by relative anonymity.
 

Big Ben

Well-Known Member
Joined
11 October 2012
Messages
914
Location
On the frozen prairies
Visit site
OP, get a grip.

I was asked what weight he was, I'm answering, now we are into maths instead of opinions, it is interesting again, so my grip is fine thanks.

Interesting reading here..

While most healthy horses can easily carry a rider and saddle, they do have their limits. Now researchers have identified a threshold for when a rider is too heavy for a horse to comfortably carry.

The scientists base their findings on detailed measurements taken of eight horses that were ridden while packing anywhere from 15 to 30% of their body weight. The horses ranged in size from 400 to 625 kilograms (885 to 1375 pounds).

When carrying 15 and 20% of their body weight, the horses showed relatively little indication of stress. It's when they were packing weights of 25% that physical signs changed markedly, and these became accentuated under 30% loads.

The horses had noticeably faster breathing and higher heart rates when carrying tack and rider amounting to 25% or more of their body weight. A day after trotting and cantering with the heftier weights, the horses' muscles showed substantially greater soreness and tightness. Those horses that were least sore from the exercise had wider loins, the part of a horse's back located between their last rib and croup.

Based on these results, the study's authors recommend that horses not be loaded with greater than 20% of their body weight. A 545-kilogram (1200 pound) horse, then would be best off carrying no more than 109 kg (240 lbs) of tack and rider.

Interestingly, this research from the Ohio State University Agricultural Technical Institute has concluded with the same weight guideline that the US Calvary Manuals of Horse Management published in 1920.
Reference

Debra M. Powell, Karen Bennett-Wimbush, Amy Peeples and Maria Duthie. 2008. Evaluation of Indicators of Weight-Carrying Ability of Light Riding Horses. Journal of Equine Veterinary Science. 28(1): 28-33.

Has there been a study on walking and the affects I wonder.
 
Last edited:

Flame_

Well-Known Member
Joined
15 November 2007
Messages
8,124
Location
Merseyside
Visit site
Lose some weight before you get back up. Make sure your horses (all of them, from the Big Fella to the small one) are fit, conditioned and able to carry your weight. THEN go riding. Make life easy (for your dearly beloved horses, and yourself), it's a no-brainer.

I'm not disagreeing, I just want to make the point that race horses are frequently pushed to and beyond their physical limits, so are many other horses tbh. Horses all have their jobs to do for us and some are highly demanding and cause the horses serious wear and tear and injuries, even brood mares end up dipping in the middle and are being placed at risk of complications. Is carrying a fat hobby rider around for a bit really that damaging to horses compared to say racing, eventing or polo? I know, "they're conditioned, blah blah, blah.." but really so is the fat person's leisure horse, in so much as any horse can be conditioned to become accustomed to whatever it is we are wanting them to do for us. I think we're in danger of being quite hypocritical here having a problem with just one physically demanding equine job, IYSWIM?
 

Coldfeet!

Well-Known Member
Joined
18 October 2012
Messages
204
Visit site
Hey Waytail/Flame,

Good advice, I wont get back on him now, like i say I fell off the wagon big style, I have turned him away, I took all of his measurements before I turned him away (weight/bone/height/girth/length) and I can see he is going through a pretty good growth spurt, he has gone bum high, im 5ft 4 and I wont even get back on the scales now but Im going to get it back off again, I know I can do it again, I did it once for him and I will do it again.

Then next year I will re-do his stats and do the maths.

I cant even look at a picture of myself on him, there is no point doing this until I can get back to where I was, let him grow on and mature etc. I will see what a bit more growth and maturity bring.

I could ride him fat, and even though I am not skinny when I have lost weight I still feel its unfair to make him carry more than he is able because its selfish and wrong, which is why I lost weight.

There was uproar among friends and family when this happened as everyone thought I worked so hard and did great and looked great and looked good on him but like I say doesnt matter what you weigh there is always some bu**er who thinks you are fat! LOL I didnt buy the saddle at the time as I didnt see the point but it was 1 16.5" saddle, correct me if I am wrong but this isnt an overly large saddle is it??
 
Top