Tnavas
Well-Known Member
I have to say I enjoy the critique! Means I know exactly what I need to improve on etc... Having someone video from ground is also beneficial as a lot if the time tests can feel better than they look. . in our last test my made decided she was at a pony party and threw a mahoosuve buck at first canter transition and struck off on wrong leg... We got a 4 and a " very disobedient" comment which I will admit did make me smile.
Me to! I am more annoyed if there is nothing written at all. At least if I'm told something no matter how negative it is to me it's a positive thing to work on.
I used to write for a lady known for her harsh comments. Yet there were many riders who loved competing in her ring, because she marked fairly and would give 9's and 10's when deserved. The comments are additional extras, often left blank when there is nothing to really say. The marks reflect the quality of the movement shown.
If you feel that you rode like a numpty but you felt the horse went OK for his level of schooling then ignore the comments made by a judge, who no doubt at Intro A has seen many numpty riders ride bad tests and is probably wondering why she gave up her day to judge.
I'm sorry but I can't get my head around people's desire to have something nice said to them when they've not met the grade. It's like consolation races where every participant gets a ribbon - even if they came last. That's for little kids.
If my marks are low and comments harsh then I buck up my ideas and go home and work harder. Is this just me or is it because I was raised in an era where this was the norm.