Abacus
Well-Known Member
I partially disgree. Of course you can and should monitor each horse you are responsible for, and spot differences, and signs of stress.We must not think that we can’t learn about horses welfare with scientific invention from needles and blood screening.
There are loads of ways to assess horses well being on a day to day basis you can train yourself to watch and monitor each horse .
They give you clues all the time.
However, objective and controlled research across wider groups gives a body of knowledge and direction to all of us, particularly when it is able to demonstrate findings with factors we can't see and monitor easily, such as heart rate (and this doesn't require invasive needles etc).
Also, if there is to be change in competition rules or welfare laws, peer reviewed research allows for a much stronger argument.
EDITED - I meant objective