skinnydipper
Well-Known Member
Deleted as probably not relevant to a discussion about Scotland XL bullies in Scotland.
Last edited:
Like a halter bred quarter horse!My word, that taller dog has no hind angulation at all.
You still wouldnt meet to meet them on a dark night though?Like I said, police have no training on type, but I reckon I'd be safe putting a tenner on neither being xl or xl types.
Can you elaborate? What makes them not XL/pitbull type?Like I said, police have no training on type, but I reckon I'd be safe putting a tenner on neither being xl or xl types.
Because they don’t look the right type. The smaller looks like an American bulldog, the bigger a mastiff type. Rather proves my point about the average police officer being unable to spot one! I don’t think either is an xl. Do you?Can you elaborate? What makes them not XL/pitbull type?
I think that these dogs are all of pitbull type, the niceties of any of them being XL or not is just obfuscation. None of them are recognised differentiated "breeds" with properly kept studbooks and breed standards or regulation for conformation or temperament. And all of them appear over and over again on lists of dogs that have attacked and killed. So do huskies and Jack Russells, but as one-offs, not repeat offenders.Because they don’t look the right type. The smaller looks like an American bulldog, the bigger a mastiff type. Rather proves my point about the average polic3 officer being unable to spot one! I don’t think either is an xl. Do you?
In America.....american bulldogs are a recognised breed. .
American Bulldog - Dog Breed Information
Is the American Bulldog the right breed for you? Learn more about the American Bulldog including personality, history, grooming, pictures, videos, and the AKC breed standard.www.akc.org
Yeah, but rather different ones, and I'm afraid I'm not impressed with what happens in America with regards to standards, particularly in dog (and cat) breeding. Also we're not in America.and? There's lots of breeds all over the world that the UK KC don't recognised, doesn't mean they aren't breeds without records/pedigrees/standards?
Mordant sarcasm, eh? Grand, but missing the point. What may be fine in America (murderous temperament) doesn't have any bearing on what is acceptable here. I believe that most people would prefer not to be savaged by dogs.Yeah, I didn't know that, thanks for informing me.
see I thought your point was that they weren't a breed, not that they were savage. Not sure our KC is that great either.Mordant sarcasm, eh? Grand, but missing the point. What may be fine in America (murderous temperament) doesn't have any bearing on what is acceptable here. I believe that most people would prefer not to be savaged by dogs.
My point, which I'm not getting across very well, is that they are all derivatives of the pitbull - incidentally also banned - and quibbling over whether a dog is xl or not is to my mind not actually all that relevant, although I'm sure that that is what people will be hung up upon.I've seen a lot of the sort of dog on the left over the years. It was my area's new staffie about ten years ago. I don't think it's an xl type. I remember being trapped in the kids' play area by one because the owner ignored me asking for it to be recalled and Zak was very unhappy.
Interesting that we have different perspectives re what is/what isn't an xl. How on earth are the police supposed to make decisions? As pp, I think there are other things afoot in the case linked.
But I didn’t think the new rules mention crosses and to me, the left one looks like a mastiff, the right could be an English bulldog cross/boxer cross, neither of which are mentioned in the rules. Again, who gets to decide when it’s ‘of type’?A pitbull and all its crosses are banned than now has been broadened specify the XLB.
Those 2 dogs are derivatives of pitbulls so they would have been banned before the XLB was explicitly stated.