Smitty
Well-Known Member
I don't mind these beasts hurting their owners, but a random person on the street SHOULD NOT be attacked by a dog.
I read that. Quite apart from how dreadful for child and dad, the XL owner seemed to be doing a lot of training and work with the dog, believing it's how they are raised etc. So far so good, but it is only 2.![]()
XL bully: Meeting a dangerous dog owner to ask why they have one
Matt's daughter was attacked by an XL bully - he agreed to meet an owner to find out why anyone would want one.www.bbc.co.uk
I agree it had an awful start in life and it's still young, so I'd caution her against being so certain that there will not be problems down the line.
To be fair, I know a fair few set-up-to-fail dogs now (as in bought off Gumtree by a first time dog owner; already had 3/4 homes by the age of 1; Cane Corso, GSD, and bully type breeding). Their owners are putting the hours in training them, do all the homework the trainer gives them, and as a result are seeing improvement in their dogs beyond that expected.Didn’t y’all know, love is sufficient to overcome all obstacles.
But I wonder if sometimes this forum leans too heavily towards nature over nuture, because a lot of these dogs can become much more trustworthy people with the right support from their owners - if the same way that any fool can take a perfectly nice dog and wreck it with bad training and management.
And, in the case of the aforementioned CC and AB, some dogs are just born miracles.
I agree with you that people shouldn’t take such risks. The tragedy is that most of them don’t think of it as a risk until they start having issues. My point is just that bull/molosser types from bad backgrounds aren’t all inherently walking weapons and that there is a big element of nurture that tends to get downplayed on here.My perspective on this is that - yes - some folks get lucky. Some dogs are just born miracles. But if you choose to buy a bull breed, or "rescue" one from dodgy circumstances, you are massively increasing the risk of something bad happening. And when something bad happens with these dogs, it's really bad.
I don't understand why people would choose to take that risk, when there are so many less risky dogs out there.
To be fair, I know a fair few set-up-to-fail dogs now (as in bought off Gumtree by a first time dog owner; already had 3/4 homes by the age of 1; Cane Corso, GSD, and bully type breeding). Their owners are putting the hours in training them, do all the homework the trainer gives them, and as a result are seeing improvement in their dogs beyond that expected.
I also know two dogs (Cane Corso and American Bulldog) who, on paper, are a disaster waiting to happen. Both live in a small flat with lots of children, haven’t received much training because their novice owners don’t want to put the time in, and their breeding’s unknown because they’ve been passed around but neither of them look good enough conformation wise to have been bred responsibly.
And yet, for some reason, these two dogs are possibly the most stable dogs I’ve ever laid eyes on. They put every other dog we get in to shame.
Obviously, I’m not advocating that people buy dogs from dodgy backgrounds or breeding, I’m well aware of the importance of good breeding and rearing, and I get that there’s potentially something pathologically wrong with certain XL bullies that makes them particularly unreliable. But I wonder if sometimes this forum leans too heavily towards nature over nuture, because a lot of these dogs can become much more trustworthy people with the right support from their owners - if the same way that any fool can take a perfectly nice dog and wreck it with bad training and management.
And, in the case of the aforementioned CC and AB, some dogs are just born miracles.
My point is just that bull/molosser types from bad backgrounds aren’t all inherently walking weapons and that there is a big element of nurture that tends to get downplayed on here.
I understand you are now a dog trainer's assistant.To be fair, I know a fair few set-up-to-fail dogs now (as in bought off Gumtree by a first time dog owner; already had 3/4 homes by the age of 1; Cane Corso, GSD, and bully type breeding). Their owners are putting the hours in training them, do all the homework the trainer gives them, and as a result are seeing improvement in their dogs beyond that expected.
I also know two dogs (Cane Corso and American Bulldog) who, on paper, are a disaster waiting to happen. Both live in a small flat with lots of children, haven’t received much training because their novice owners don’t want to put the time in, and their breeding’s unknown because they’ve been passed around but neither of them look good enough conformation wise to have been bred responsibly.
And yet, for some reason, these two dogs are possibly the most stable dogs I’ve ever laid eyes on. They put every other dog we get in to shame.
Obviously, I’m not advocating that people buy dogs from dodgy backgrounds or breeding, I’m well aware of the importance of good breeding and rearing, and I get that there’s potentially something pathologically wrong with certain XL bullies that makes them particularly unreliable. But I wonder if sometimes this forum leans too heavily towards nature over nuture, because a lot of these dogs can become much more trustworthy people with the right support from their owners - if the same way that any fool can take a perfectly nice dog and wreck it with bad training and management.
And, in the case of the aforementioned CC and AB, some dogs are just born miracles.
I believe that dog did something similar last year and nothing was done![]()
Newtownards: Police officers destroy dog after attack on two people
Police responded to the incident in the Newtownards shortly after 18:30 BST on Thursday.www.bbc.co.uk
Locals are upset the dog has had to be PTS?! I'm sure they'd be more upset if it attacked them![]()
![]()
South Yorkshire | Latest News & Updates | BBC News
Get all the latest news, live updates and content about South Yorkshire from across the BBC.www.bbc.co.uk