DabDab
Ah mud, splendid
I refer to mine as dogletts. They're like real dogs, only smaller
Just for balance, my dog eats dog food, if she ever gets dog safe scraps they're put in her bowl when she's not looking so she doesn't expect our food, she is only ever given training treats from my hand never actual food, she wears an equafleece in very muddy conditions because neither of us enjoy the bathing experience and she has very little hair on her belly so gets cold, she's not called a furbaby just a baby (by me, Mr AP balks at the very idea), has had a fortune pumped into training her and us (she's our first dog).
I don't want to derail the thread, and I know you've said it specifically about people who use the term furbabies... But I feel I'm teetering on the edge of that category, and I just wanted to point out that not all of us who baby our dogs to an extent are completely clueless, some of us (me) are just saps. Not to say I'm not clueless either, I certainly don't know half of what some people here know, but we're doing our best for her every day and learning as we go.
She also has a Christmas jumper
Also sorry I used so many parentheses, I have ADHD and every thought comes with bonus content
Agreed. Some dogs are absolutely great with family/friends/people known to them but suspicious/wary/scared of strangers/unknown people so may act out of fear. I seem to recall seeing a pitbull type being tested in police kennels when the pitbull ban came in and I’m sure lots of dogs of various breeds wouldn’t have enjoyed or been tolerant of the way they were handled by a complete stranger. So I do understand the concerns of the responsible bull breed owners who care very much for their dogs.It’s fair enough on paper.
No one’s disputing that dogs who are a proven danger to public safety should be PTS. But it’s how the court decides that a dog is indeed a danger to public safety, that has thus far been left ambiguous in the press and discussions of the ban.
You can’t expect owners not to worry about that when it’s not exactly a binary.
I don't doubt that a lot of people are functionally illiterate, and therefore up in arms about proposed legislation they don't quite understand, but it's not as simple as the "your dog won't be killed if you tick off every point on this list".
The DDA says that dogs can receive exemption iff "a court has determined that the dog is not a danger to public safety under section 4(1A) or 4B of the Act and has made the dog subject to a contingent destruction order under section 4A or 4B of the Act", but there's not much, if any, information being publicly provided on how the courts determine that. The muzzling/leashing is only an option if that clause is fulfilled; otherwise the dog dies. Any infraction, and the dog dies.
If the government implements the ban like they banned the pitbull, owners may face legal fees they struggle to afford; their dog might be seized by police and spend a year in kennels solely because it's suspected of being a banned breed [x]; their dog might be set on fire or made aggressive due to police incompetence when trying to seize it [x]; or their dog might be PTS for an minor infraction like the insurance briefly lapsing, or the dog not being muzzled in a car [x]. Moreover, the DDA requires that dogs on the Index of Exempt Dogs have third-party insurance, but most insurance companies won't accept banned breeds.
Until the government clearly states how people can get their dogs exempted - and until the government makes the DDA more ethically and legally acceptable - you can't blame people for being worried about their dog's future.
I was at the out of hours vets this weekend and they asked me if my baby would find it too stressful to be weighed. I told them my dog was fine being weighed, took her over to the scales and gave her the cue I use for placeboard work and she hopped on and sat still until I released her.I think it is unfair to dogs to call them babies or treat them like babies.
This, for me, is the key thing. As a dog owner you have a responsibility to keep both your dog and other people safe. Too many people bury their heads in the sand and blindly believe that their ‘baby’ would never hurt a fly. I think we have to be aware of the potential our dogs have for causing harm and take appropriate precautions. My Lab currently has dodgy adolescent recall and so is kept on a lead or longline much of the time. I don’t think she would hurt anyone but I do not want her bouncing up to other dogs or people, being a nuisance, or getting herself on the wrong side or an aggressive dog. If I am walking her at sparrows fart and no-one else is around I will let her off lead and do lots of recall practice in between letting her run and sniff but I am constantly horizon scanning so I can recall her if we see another person. If I had a dog that weighed more than me and was easily capable of killing an adult I would have the thing on a lead and muzzled in public - for my own peace of mind if nothing else. Sadly many people nowadays are so entitled that they don’t think of anything or anyone but themselves and what they believe their rights are.Your post Moobli has reminded me of the American bulldog x in the lodge next to us when we were on holiday earlier this year. His owner was a trainer and she seemed to have done everything right with this dog. She spent a lot of time doing brain exercises with him in the garden but whenever he went out he had a muzzle on . She told us he was a rescue , was good with people but reactive with dogs. He seemed a very laid back dog but she was doing everything she could to make sure he didn't cause any issues (walks him at 5 am at home) and I am sure she will comply with every rule needed, unfortunately I suspect she is in the minority with these dogs.
Sensible response from a bull breed owner who owns a very large American Bulldog.
View attachment 123815
This is a similar approach to mine in respect to owning a Cane Corso.
I love the breed. I was/am aware with the Lab too, but feel a greater amount of responsibility with the CC.
Wallace kennels in Essex have a CC for rehoming , let’s hope someone sensible gets him
I looked him up as well poor boy , what chance does he have , I so hope he’s lucky .Wallace kennels in Essex have a CC for rehoming , let’s hope someone sensible gets him
I think it's shocking that the situation is allowed to perpetuate. Not least for the dog's sake.BBC News - Biden dog Commander bites another Secret Service agent
"Commander, the Biden family's two-year-old German Shepherd, has bitten yet another Secret Service agent... This is the 11th time the dog has bitten a guard at the White House or the Biden family home... The other Biden dog, Major, has also been involved in numerous biting incidents with Secret Service agents...."
Biden dog Commander bites another Secret Service agent
This is the 11th time Commander has bitten a guard at the White House or the Biden family home.www.bbc.co.uk
BBC News - Biden dog Commander bites another Secret Service agent
"Commander, the Biden family's two-year-old German Shepherd, has bitten yet another Secret Service agent... This is the 11th time the dog has bitten a guard at the White House or the Biden family home... The other Biden dog, Major, has also been involved in numerous biting incidents with Secret Service agents...."
Biden dog Commander bites another Secret Service agent
This is the 11th time Commander has bitten a guard at the White House or the Biden family home.www.bbc.co.uk
It sounds as though the child was lucky to survive, and wouldn't have if people hadn't been there to try to beat the dog off from the start. I hope that he is over to get over such a terrifying thing happening at such a young age, and I can imagine it was pretty awful for the people who helped save the child too.Liverpool woman sentenced after boy, 4, attacked by bully XL
The boy suffered devastating injuries after walking into a garden asking to play with the woman's son.www.bbc.co.uk
Can't see this one.