Another fatal dog attack

Cortez

Tough but Fair
Joined
17 January 2009
Messages
15,262
Location
Ireland
Visit site
The bull breeds are all descended from bull baiting dogs, originally used to seize cattle by the nose and hold them for slaughter, probably since Roman times and certainly since the medieval period. Bull baiting (and bear baiting, and other misfortunate creatures, including horses) became a popular spectator sport in Tudor times. The shorter muzzle and massive jaw was bred in to facilitate a better grip.
 

CorvusCorax

Justified & Ancient
Joined
15 January 2008
Messages
57,681
Location
Mu Mu Land
Visit site
I agree and I know we're going round in circles, but just to remind folk that it's the terrier blood that brings the tenacity and fighting spirit. I don't know why people are surprised that a (particularly a native breed to these islands) terrier would be able to take on and kill a much bigger adversary.
 

KittenInTheTree

Well-Known Member
Joined
9 October 2014
Messages
2,372
Visit site
I'm obviously being silly, but TBH these days it probably wouldn't surprise me all that much if someone thought it would be a good idea to breed giant terriers, and then we really would be in trouble 😲
There are already several large breeds of terrier. Airedales, Black Russians, Kerry Blues, and Standard and Giant Schnauzers, for example.
 

DabDab

Ah mud, splendid
Joined
6 May 2013
Messages
12,698
Visit site
I agree and I know we're going round in circles, but just to remind folk that it's the terrier blood that brings the tenacity and fighting spirit. I don't know why people are surprised that a (particularly a native breed to these islands) terrier would be able to take on and kill a much bigger adversary.

Exactly. It doesn't take much knowledge of the breed heritage of these animals to tell you that breeding them to also be of substantial size was going to produce a worryingly formidable animal.

I love terriers but they are not guardian, retrieving or herding animals, they are hunting animals, bred to be comfortable in the thick of a scrap with the tenacity to finish the job.

And the guy who started the breed saying that he was trying to breed the terrier instincts out of the pitbull...Well personally I think he was in cloud cookoo land - trying to inbreed your way out of terrier characteristics is frankly the scribblings of a madman
 

CorvusCorax

Justified & Ancient
Joined
15 January 2008
Messages
57,681
Location
Mu Mu Land
Visit site
The problem with trying to breed anything in or out is that you'll have a few generations of wastage with one or two suitable for breeding in every litter, if you're lucky.

Back in the day the ones not for breeding were culled/neutered/not bred from. Now they seem to get sold for lots of money into pet homes and often get bred anyway.
 

twiggy2

Well-Known Member
Joined
3 July 2013
Messages
11,444
Location
Highlands from Essex
Visit site
I grew up with a staffie in the village who was the most loveable, goofy guy, but I wouldn't own one: I am a confirmed longdog lover.

I have a friend who has had a parade of "fierce" dogs one after the other (they don't seem to last long under his "care"); English Bull Terrier, several pitbulls in various guises including XL, Precio de Canario, Glen of Imaal (they are also "difficult" dogs unless properly handled), Cane de Corso, Rottweiler, Rottweiler crossed with a Great Dane, etc. He has them because they are aggressive "manly" dogs, and proceeds to treat them appallingly, and yes of course they are dodgy, unpredictable and bite people, kill things, including a full grown sow - Glen of Imaal's party trick, and get seized by the dog warden and put down. He is precisely the type of person who should not own any dog, and especially not the type of dog he likes.

There were two of them, they're not small, they are long, weighty, and very muscular with short legs, and they are VERY tenacious. It took them several hours, during which they disembowelled the poor thing and basically ripped her throat out. I arrived in time to pull them off and finish the sow, it was one of the more horrific things I've seen. Not the dogs' fault, just a stupid, stupid owner. He was inside watching the football the whole time this was going on and "didn't hear a thing". It was neither the first nor the last thing they killed. Neighbouring farmer shot both when they came in to his calf shed.

ETA they're about 14" at the shoulder and the dog weighed 45lbs. Also dog aggressive. Fine with people.
I am sorry but at an average of 15kg these dogs are hardly bred to look aggressive. Yes they are terriers, they will kill prey it doesn't mean they will hurt people or other dogs.
Dogs left to their own devices are a risk and this breed are hardly renown for being an issue.
Where I used to live the farmers boxer used to regularly kill badgers and feral cats, she was no risk to people or dogs and it wouldn't make me say the breed were a worry. She was bored and the owner was a fool.
Screenshot_20231012-110759_Chrome.jpg
Are XL bullies not an extreme form of bull terrier - so in effect giant terriers?
No they are a completely different breed, bull terrier is short for English bull terrier and they don't have a negative following possibly because they are complete clowns, aloof in general and possibly less tolerant of idiots than the bull breeds.
 

marmalade76

Well-Known Member
Joined
24 April 2009
Messages
6,852
Location
Gloucestershire
Visit site
Ok so what is a "Bull Terrier" then? If that's an "English Bull Terrier"

I think I am confused re how people are using this terminology.

A Staffie is a bull terrier, so is the Pit Bull.

The various new Bully types/breeds coming from the US are reported to have Pit Bull Terriers as their foundation so the XL is a supersized Bull Terrier and technically already illegal here as Pit Bull crosses.
 

CanteringCarrot

Well-Known Member
Joined
1 April 2018
Messages
5,543
Visit site
I think it might help if people say which bull terrier they mean, eg Pitbull terrier, Staffordshire bull terrier, English bull terrier

I agree.

A Staffie is a bull terrier, so is the Pit Bull.

The various new Bully types/breeds coming from the US are reported to have Pit Bull Terriers as their foundation so the XL is a supersized Bull Terrier and technically already illegal here as Pit Bull crosses.

Yes, this I know.

It's just when people say "bull terrier" it's so general and/or makes me think English Bull Terrier, but I guess I should not think that if there is no English before the Bull. Sometimes we've (in real life) just called them Bull Terriers (minus the English) so I think that's why I was thinking that.

Perhaps a dense me problem.

Then again sometimes in the convo, specifics may be best.
 

marmalade76

Well-Known Member
Joined
24 April 2009
Messages
6,852
Location
Gloucestershire
Visit site
I agree.



Yes, this I know.

It's just when people say "bull terrier" it's so general and/or makes me think English Bull Terrier, but I guess I should not think that if there is no English before the Bull. Sometimes we've (in real life) just called them Bull Terriers (minus the English) so I think that's why I was thinking that.

Perhaps a dense me problem.

Then again sometimes in the convo, specifics may be best.


Bull Terriers are a group of breeds.
 

islander

Well-Known Member
Joined
18 November 2011
Messages
467
Location
miles from anywhere
Visit site
My very large Airedale bitch, years ago, was extremely placid until she was about 2 when she had a fight with another bitch, a golden retriever. I think they were after the same stick in the woods. The owner and l kept them well apart after that.
Later in life she was uncertain with very small dogs, perhaps she thought they were vermin. I muzzled her on walks then.
She was always extremely well behaved with people however.
l think the terrier instinct is always there and a big one can do a lot of damage.
 

skinnydipper

Well-Known Member
Joined
11 February 2018
Messages
6,366
Visit site
No they are a completely different breed, bull terrier is short for English bull terrier and they don't have a negative following possibly because they are complete clowns, aloof in general and possibly less tolerant of idiots than the bull breeds.

I'm glad nobody told my dog that's how she should be. She was everyone's friend, canine and human. Very enthusiastic and eager to please.
 

DabDab

Ah mud, splendid
Joined
6 May 2013
Messages
12,698
Visit site
I agree.



Yes, this I know.

It's just when people say "bull terrier" it's so general and/or makes me think English Bull Terrier, but I guess I should not think that if there is no English before the Bull. Sometimes we've (in real life) just called them Bull Terriers (minus the English) so I think that's why I was thinking that.

Perhaps a dense me problem.

Then again sometimes in the convo, specifics may be best.
I think generally people are referring to bull terriers as a group - all the breeds originally created by mixing old English bulldog with terriers, originally intended for bull baiting. Where the original English bulldogs came from, iirc, is unclear. Mastiffs were probably the starting point, but what they mixed in to get a smaller, faster dog is unclear, and when you look at old paintings of English bulldogs they look very much like the pitbulls of today (and bear little resemblance to the modern English bulldog).

And then the other motivation behind the victorian terrier-bull mixes was fashion. They were the cockapoos of their day, so, particularly in the case of the early EBTs, there was a lot of other dog breeds added in to give the more refined look (and temperament?) to them. Whereas the breeding of Staffies around the same time seemed to be more focused on the dog fighting market than the fashionable pet market.
 

skinnydipper

Well-Known Member
Joined
11 February 2018
Messages
6,366
Visit site
It is interesting to see how the conformation of the EBT has changed over the years.

100 years ago.

1697111904637.png



1697111429262-png.125069
 
Last edited:

islander

Well-Known Member
Joined
18 November 2011
Messages
467
Location
miles from anywhere
Visit site
English Bull Terriers (EBTs) can be lovely, l have known several, especially good with people, as are Staffies, but they do try to finish fights if they are in one.
l think their small deep-set eyes make it difficult for people to ‘read’ them, they often seem expressionless though of course they are giving off signals by stance, tail, growling etc.
My sister had one which didn't like other dogs approaching but the family discovered that she was obsessed with carrying a car hubcap around with her and wouldn’t drop this for any dog. In her case the problem was solved.
 

SilverLinings

Well-Known Member
Joined
12 August 2017
Messages
2,702
Visit site
Any that go in to rescue should be put down. No ifs, no buts.

I think that would be the sensible approach, as surely with any rescue the charity cannot know a dog's full history, or even whether anything they have been told by the previous owner is true. Obviously this applies to all breeds, but as has been discussed on this thread the XLB is particularly powerful, gives little warning of an attack and appears to be predisposed to aggression.

I wonder if the worker being attacked will make some charities realise that even if they don't like (for whatever reason) the idea of PTS physically healthy dogs they may end up in a big legal mess if they rehome an XLB that causes serious harm or death to someone in it's new home.
 

twiggy2

Well-Known Member
Joined
3 July 2013
Messages
11,444
Location
Highlands from Essex
Visit site
The dogs going into rescue have to be assessed to decide what breed they are, the first member of staff to see them cannot be solely responsible for deciding what breed they are.
The dogs trust had been pro active in offering free muzzle training opportunities for XL bullies, other establishments to my knowledge haven't, let's hope this doesn't put and end to that.
I feel for the member of staff it must be terrible.
 
Top