CDJ withdrawn from paris

little_critter

Well-Known Member
Joined
20 June 2009
Messages
6,117
Visit site
Anyone who can afford to keep them to ride by definition can afford to keep them as pets. Whether they might want to is a separate matter.
Exactly. A non ridden horse costs the same (possibly less) than a ridden horse to keep.
However, I agree that few people would purchase a horse with the intention of it not being ridden.
 

Burnttoast

Well-Known Member
Joined
15 March 2009
Messages
2,464
Visit site
Exactly. A non ridden horse costs the same (possibly less) than a ridden horse to keep.
However, I agree that few people would purchase a horse with the intention of it not being ridden.
Yes the second part is true I'm sure. I'm one of the few who (if my health allowed, sadly it doesn't) would willingly follow up on my retired guy with a herd of rescue minis (except that my vet threatened never to visit again if I did that 🤣 )
 

EventingMum

Well-Known Member
Joined
9 September 2010
Messages
6,250
Location
The Wet West of Scotland
Visit site
How Many Horses Died in WW1 and WW2? Millions of animals served in both wars but died because of thirst, wounds, diseases, and starvation. Over 8 Million horses in WW1 and 0.7 million in WW2 died, any left killled and eaten, and how many couldn't be bothered to get off their backsides to go and vote, after all the sacrifice, so many so called animal lovers didn't have the respect to go and use their hard won vote, any media outcry........no...,,maybe whilst the country is apologising for something our ancestors did 200 years ago, maybe it could apologise for all the animal abuse and suffering caused, you know, just whilst everyone is being all high and mighty and all that.

All year every year, particularly at Appleby, horse/ponies ridden at too young an age, raced up and down on hard surfaces shouted at and whipped, forced into the river with two riders on, heads pushed under the water, waiting for the outcry............no....why is that ?, waiting.....

I'm all for animal abuse being exposed, and the individual being held to account and dealt with accordingly, but the "selective" crucifying of one individual, just at this "particular" moment in time totally stinks.
Re Appleby, there definitely needs to be action taken regarding horse welfare there, unfortunately a major part of the problem is that it concerns a certain sector of society who are feared by a lot of people or if criticised it's said to be bigotry. Their treatment of animals is usually seen as ignorance/lack of education however, with CDJ that is not the case. She has been looked up to and presented herself as an educated, skilled rider and trainer.
 

lannerch

Well-Known Member
Joined
19 July 2008
Messages
3,563
Location
Shropshire
Visit site
I have not read all the posts there’s far too many .

But my take is the abuse is horrifyingly and I could never condone it , but she cannot train her horses regularly this way as she we old never get the results and harmony she does with them , and her horses always look totally relaxed .

She is being punished and quite right too , I suspect the worst of any punishment is the fact that she has had to pull out of the olympics and only days before she was set to leave for Paris , this is something she has worked for for 4 years .

Let’s see what the FEI also do , suspect there is a lot more to follow .
 

Skib

Well-Known Member
Joined
6 March 2011
Messages
2,376
Location
London
sites.google.com
Over 8 Million horses [died] in WW1 and 0.7 million in WW2 died,
I dont think this is right. I am a War historian. I dont have the reference with me here tonight with my mind on the Olympic games but I believe that more horses died in WW2 than in WW1.
Restrictions on German rearmament after WW1 meant that in WW2 the Germans invaded France with horses - and later retreated from Normandy also with horses.
On the Eastern front in WW2, the Russians used cavalry in conjunction with tanks and had military aid - truck chasis from USA and horses from Mongolia.
 

poiuytrewq

Well-Known Member
Joined
3 April 2008
Messages
18,838
Location
Cotswolds
Visit site
Just skipped to the last page having read the first few originally. It’s taken off!

I’m not going to read it all, but just commenting the past few days that I’ve been asked so much about this the past day or so and there seems a pattern in opinions. I’ve
Everyone non horsey seems to be totally horrified and everyone horsey a bit “eww” maybe not condoning but not wanting to see her go down for this or and this is possibly the majority we have seen or done worse.
 

Pedantic

Well-Known Member
Joined
3 November 2007
Messages
7,567
Location
Derbyshire
Visit site
Charlotte is not being crucified. She has been suspended pending an investigation for abuse that she has been filmed doing. What do you suggest should have been done? Let her pop off to the Olympics and carry on as if nothing happened?

No, I expect the same spotlight treatment for all, not this selective media persecution.
 

Jenko109

Well-Known Member
Joined
13 July 2020
Messages
1,523
Visit site
Everyone non horsey seems to be totally horrified and everyone horsey a bit “eww” maybe not condoning but not wanting to see her go down for this or and this is possibly the majority we have seen or done worse.

Do you think it is in part because horse people already knew that this sort of thing goes on.

We know show jumpers get poles lifted to knock their legs. We know show ponies are left tied down all day.

So we are saddened when we actually see it, but we are not shocked to the same degree as someone non horsey who perhaps had no idea about any of these practices.

It is a sad reality, that where there is money and fame, there will be exploitation.

I do not believe that people who undertake such practices are inherently bad people. There was a time when they simply loved horses, just like everyone on this forum. Somewhere along the journey, they lost their way.
 

Miss_Millie

Well-Known Member
Joined
27 August 2020
Messages
1,170
Visit site
Anyone who can afford to keep them to ride by definition can afford to keep them as pets. Whether they might want to is a separate matter.

Agreed!

The definition of pet is 'a domestic or tamed animal kept for companionship or pleasure.' I see my horses as pets, both ridden and non-ridden. Both bring me a lot of happiness and companionship. The non-ridden are more affordable generally, as they don't need saddle fitting or the same amount of physio etc.

I understand that most people primarily own horses for riding, but that can be a problem in and of itself when the riding is put above welfare - e.g. youngsters carrying weight before they can manage it, because people want to ride asap.

I think that horse welfare would generally be better if people viewed horses as companions first and steeds second. I know that's never going to happen, but it would be nice.
 

Upthecreek

Well-Known Member
Joined
9 May 2019
Messages
2,719
Visit site
No, I expect the same spotlight treatment for all, not this selective media persecution.

Clearly someone not as well known is not going to attract the same attention from the media as someone who has won 6 Olympic medals, been an advocate for horse welfare and a role model for young riders. People get prosecuted for animal cruelty all the time and the fact they are not famous means that it’s not in the spotlight. I don’t know why anyone that prioritises horse welfare above all would think it’s a bad thing that this news has broken at this time.
 

Sanversera

Well-Known Member
Joined
22 November 2020
Messages
1,870
Visit site
Agreed!

The definition of pet is 'a domestic or tamed animal kept for companionship or pleasure.' I see my horses as pets, both ridden and non-ridden. Both bring me a lot of happiness and companionship. The non-ridden are more affordable generally, as they don't need saddle fitting or the same amount of physio etc.

I understand that most people primarily own horses for riding, but that can be a problem in and of itself when the riding is put above welfare - e.g. youngsters carrying weight before they can manage it, because people want to ride asap.

I think that horse welfare would generally be better if people viewed horses as companions first and steeds second. I know that's never going to happen, but it would be nice.
Mine are companions first and steeds second.
 

teapot

Well-Known Member
Joined
16 December 2005
Messages
36,879
Visit site
I dont think this is right. I am a War historian. I dont have the reference with me here tonight with my mind on the Olympic games but I believe that more horses died in WW2 than in WW1.
Restrictions on German rearmament after WW1 meant that in WW2 the Germans invaded France with horses - and later retreated from Normandy also with horses.
On the Eastern front in WW2, the Russians used cavalry in conjunction with tanks and had military aid - truck chasis from USA and horses from Mongolia.

Some figures here by someone who works on horses in war https://lucybetteridgedyson.com/2020/11/04/straight-from-the-horses-mouth/
 

poiuytrewq

Well-Known Member
Joined
3 April 2008
Messages
18,838
Location
Cotswolds
Visit site
Do you think it is in part because horse people already knew that this sort of thing goes on.

We know show jumpers get poles lifted to knock their legs. We know show ponies are left tied down all day.

So we are saddened when we actually see it, but we are not shocked to the same degree as someone non horsey who perhaps had no idea about any of these practices.

It is a sad reality, that where there is money and fame, there will be exploitation.

I do not believe that people who undertake such practices are inherently bad people. There was a time when they simply loved horses, just like everyone on this forum. Somewhere along the journey, they lost their way.
Maybe. I don’t know, It’s just my observation as so many people have mentioned it and being on non horsey platforms, many more non horsey people are talking about it
 

blitznbobs

Well-Known Member
Joined
19 June 2010
Messages
6,576
Location
Cheshire
Visit site
How Many Horses Died in WW1 and WW2? Millions of animals served in both wars but died because of thirst, wounds, diseases, and starvation. Over 8 Million horses in WW1 and 0.7 million in WW2 died, any left killled and eaten, and how many couldn't be bothered to get off their backsides to go and vote, after all the sacrifice, so many so called animal lovers didn't have the respect to go and use their hard won vote, any media outcry........no...,,maybe whilst the country is apologising for something our ancestors did 200 years ago, maybe it could apologise for all the animal abuse and suffering caused, you know, just whilst everyone is being all high and mighty and all that.

All year every year, particularly at Appleby, horse/ponies ridden at too young an age, raced up and down on hard surfaces shouted at and whipped, forced into the river with two riders on, heads pushed under the water, waiting for the outcry............no....why is that ?, waiting.....

I'm all for animal abuse being exposed, and the individual being held to account and dealt with accordingly, but the "selective" crucifying of one individual, just at this "particular" moment in time totally stinks.
The difference between war and a game is so incomparable as to be facile… one was to stop the genocide of an entire group of people the other is to get some shiny things to go on your wall….
 

honetpot

Well-Known Member
Joined
27 July 2010
Messages
9,374
Location
Cambridgeshire
Visit site
How Many Horses Died in WW1 and WW2? Millions of animals served in both wars but died because of thirst, wounds, diseases, and starvation. Over 8 Million horses in WW1 and 0.7 million in WW2 died, any left killled and eaten, and how many couldn't be bothered to get off their backsides to go and vote, after all the sacrifice, so many so called animal lovers didn't have the respect to go and use their hard won vote, any media outcry........no...,,maybe whilst the country is apologising for something our ancestors did 200 years ago, maybe it could apologise for all the animal abuse and suffering caused, you know, just whilst everyone is being all high and mighty and all that.

All year every year, particularly at Appleby, horse/ponies ridden at too young an age, raced up and down on hard surfaces shouted at and whipped, forced into the river with two riders on, heads pushed under the water, waiting for the outcry............no....why is that ?, waiting.....

I'm all for animal abuse being exposed, and the individual being held to account and dealt with accordingly, but the "selective" crucifying of one individual, just at this "particular" moment in time totally stinks.
If you are talking about the 1914-18 war, I do not think human life was valued much more than equine. At that time the equine was for the majority was the work horse, my grandfather went down the pit at fourteen to look after pit ponies, and served in the 14-18 war and was lucky to come home with just shell shock, and went back down the pit. A lot didn't,

The horse is pretty much now a companion animal, very few them are for work, and the majority of them that are worked are used for sport. I think most of us want the or equines to be safe and well looked after. What worries me is not the past, we can not change it, but the present, where people who have the control and influence seem not to be concerned about the animals they make their living from, as their objectives are more important than the animals welfare from conception and throughout its life.

Every year at Appleby there are concerns about horse welfare, and people try to improve things. If we are thinking about equines used for sport it happens on a weekly basis, there is a vast amount of money spent on it, and for large sponsers it sells a lifestyle, the influence so called elite riders have, can affect the attutudes of the average horse owner. I just hope that this make the average horse owner able to question trainers and say if needed what they are doing is wrong. They make money from us, and really with holding the £ is perhaps the most direct option to make changes.
 

SaddlePsych'D

Well-Known Member
Joined
15 December 2019
Messages
3,367
Location
In My Head
Visit site

Wayne Lourens, South African vet comment.
I'm in favour of ALL the support being given to
I'd love to have seen ALL the footage of what lead up to the incident videoed, to assess whether Charlotte's actions were according to the principles of "minimal force", which I feel they were, having myself been an observer of animal behaviour (INCLUDING Southern Africa's most dangerous wildlife, in multiple close encounters) since I was a young child.


Minimal force? Really?
 

JenJ

Well-Known Member
Joined
11 January 2010
Messages
2,432
Location
Surrey
Visit site
I'm in favour of ALL the support being given to
I'd love to have seen ALL the footage of what lead up to the incident videoed, to assess whether Charlotte's actions were according to the principles of "minimal force", which I feel they were, having myself been an observer of animal behaviour (INCLUDING Southern Africa's most dangerous wildlife, in multiple close encounters) since I was a young child.


Minimal force? Really?
Are they are likening the behaviour of the horse being whipped in the video to that of Southern Africa's most dangerous wildlife? And if not, why the hell mention it?
 

criso

Coming over here & taking your jobs since 1900
Joined
18 September 2008
Messages
12,690
Location
London but horse is in Herts
Visit site
The difference between war and a game is so incomparable as to be facile… one was to stop the genocide of an entire group of people the other is to get some shiny things to go on your wall….
If you're talking about WW1, the reasons behind it were less lofty but that's a discussion for another thread.

However these days even if modern warfare hadn't changed, I doubt the use of horses would be acceptable. There was enough controversy about the ones that got loose in London.
 
Top