VoR
Well-Known Member
Well here's my opinion.
YGWYD - whilst there were some inconsistencies in your account which I was going to raise (I think you perhaps posted in haste/anger!!??) I'm glad that the Master has been round and sorted things with you (Vodka though, seriously?????? Yuck! )
Whilst we are all monitored on a daily basis through CCTV, speed cameras, et al, these are largely (although not exclusively) by the authorities or people protecting their own property/businesses and not a group of.....hmmm....what would they call me if I went on the street and started to get involved in monitoring/trying to prevent crimes, ah that's it......vigilantes.
There may well be hunts which break the law, there are others who do not, yet they all seem to attract the interest of our 'friends' in camo and balaclavas, so are they really interested in whether the law is being broken OR as I suspect is this all about 'class' i.e. because we own horses and follow a hunt we must all be 'toffs'? How wrong they are, plenty of people I know who ride/hunt have a far less 'middle/upper-class' background than I suspect many of the sabs do! I would also say that the vast majority of people I hunt with are animal lovers (no doubt that'll stir a few up!!).
The OP was about a hunt which, regardless of whether it was hunting within the law or not have accepted that their actions were wrong and was posted by someone who it seems had not taken 'time-out' to think things through before posting. We are now once again in to the pro hunt, anti hunt debate which, unless both sides seek to understand the other, which neither side wishes to, there will be and cannot be a resolution.
Anyway, roll on Saturday
YGWYD - whilst there were some inconsistencies in your account which I was going to raise (I think you perhaps posted in haste/anger!!??) I'm glad that the Master has been round and sorted things with you (Vodka though, seriously?????? Yuck! )
Whilst we are all monitored on a daily basis through CCTV, speed cameras, et al, these are largely (although not exclusively) by the authorities or people protecting their own property/businesses and not a group of.....hmmm....what would they call me if I went on the street and started to get involved in monitoring/trying to prevent crimes, ah that's it......vigilantes.
There may well be hunts which break the law, there are others who do not, yet they all seem to attract the interest of our 'friends' in camo and balaclavas, so are they really interested in whether the law is being broken OR as I suspect is this all about 'class' i.e. because we own horses and follow a hunt we must all be 'toffs'? How wrong they are, plenty of people I know who ride/hunt have a far less 'middle/upper-class' background than I suspect many of the sabs do! I would also say that the vast majority of people I hunt with are animal lovers (no doubt that'll stir a few up!!).
The OP was about a hunt which, regardless of whether it was hunting within the law or not have accepted that their actions were wrong and was posted by someone who it seems had not taken 'time-out' to think things through before posting. We are now once again in to the pro hunt, anti hunt debate which, unless both sides seek to understand the other, which neither side wishes to, there will be and cannot be a resolution.
Anyway, roll on Saturday