Cortez
Tough but Fair
Have you ever done so?Yes quite a few actually ? Please give me your wisdom on what it takes to compete at a high level as I clearly have no clue.
Have you ever done so?Yes quite a few actually ? Please give me your wisdom on what it takes to compete at a high level as I clearly have no clue.
Yes quite a few actually ? Please give me your wisdom on what it takes to compete at a high level as I clearly have no clue.
I’ve been thinking about this, and I think part of the issue is that professionals are held to much higher standards and scrutiny, so it’s easy to say ‘oh but you see this stuff in ordinary yards etc’, but actually it’s not the same. It’s a trade off; if you want plenty of clients, an international reputation that gives you access to top standard horses, facilities and shows, plus financial rewards, investments, merchandise etc, then you will be and should be held to a much higher standard as you are much more visible. This helps to boost your career but means that you come under greater scrutiny. It’s the old ‘with great power comes great responsibility’. If you want to be considered a role mode, top professional etc, then you have to behave like that, and whacking a horse repeatedly with a branch is not professional behaviour. And if that means we should have a bloody hard look at how top riders are training their horses then I’m all for it, because our sport is a privilege not a right. I would prefer to see action taken by the proper public bodies instead of on social media, but that requires them to get their house in order. Very few people on this forum are ‘fluffy’, but there is a big difference between a smack behind the leg as a quick correction, and repeatedly whacking a horse, seemingly in temper, and I think it does a big disservice to decent trainers to justify his behaviour by drawing a false comparison.
Pretty much this.I can’t speak for Cortez, obviously. But for the pro riders I know it’s all about passion for the horse, enjoyment of the sport and the thrill (and fun) of riding to the highest standards they can. The pleasure of improving their horses, the relationships they form with their equine partners.
I can’t speak for Cortez, obviously. But for the pro riders I know it’s all about passion for the horse, enjoyment of the sport and the thrill (and fun) of riding to the highest standards they can. The pleasure of improving their horses, the relationships they form with their equine partners.
but I have as much right as you to speak from my own experience and what I have seen and heard
1. If so, why out the clip to music?
2. It's not just on this forum you know, it's global, companies have already binned MT products from their shelves, the equestrian authorities are reviewing him, etc etc, because of a two minute clip posted on TikTok, out of context, from a session which none of us were witness to.
And no, I don't condone whacking a horse with a branch.
Indeed you do. As have any of us.
Yes, this is true. What is your competition experience?Agreed. I didn’t think it was fair of Cortez to say “you plainly have no insight into what it takes to compete at a high level”. I may not share the same insight and experience as her, but that does not mean I have no insight and experience.
I thought that the video was very sad to watch. You could see the fear in the horse - fear of the water and fear of the man hitting him. The horse trying to decide which was worse, and was not given a second to process it all because he was hit continuously. It was in no way productive, the horse didn't learn anything (other than fear) and nor did the rider.
It did learn that it could jump down into the water and not fall, die, sink, etc - whatever it was scared might happen, didn't. Sometimes horses do need making to do something to realise that doing it wouldn't be the end of the world. Glad MT has acknowledged this wasn't his finest moment though and stated his regret.
It had already been in the water though - repeatedly. Honestly, the more I watch it, the more I think it just needed a few seconds to process the new angle and all would have been well.It did learn that it could jump down into the water and not fall, die, sink, etc - whatever it was scared might happen, didn't
Yes, this is true. What is your competition experience?
Not at all but it was you saying that you had all this experience of how riders at top level did things. I was just wondering what that was. I know what I know, I don't know what you know.Why is that relevant? Does every poster need to declare their competition experience before posting on this forum? Are you only qualified to comment if you’ve reached a certain level?
Not at all but it was you saying that you had all this experience of how riders at top level did things. I was just wondering what that was. I know what I know, I don't know what you know.
It had already been in the water though - repeatedly. Honestly, the more I watch it, the more I think it just needed a few seconds to process the new angle and all would have been well.
I know I’ve needed longer than that to figure out an awkward jump/bog avoidance when out hiking. And I’m supposed to be part of the “cognitively more able” of the two species!
I think all riders should do the Aonach Eagach Ridge in Glencoe, or similarly exposed knife-edge ridges (Crib Goch, Tower Ridge, most of the Cuillin, An Teallach, whatever), ideally carrying a backpack filled with heavy gear, just to make their balance while climbing a bit trickier. When they get to the scary exposed sections, where most people who aren't nonchalant about airy ledges go, "Oh, f*ck me, why am I here," their climbing buddies should start yelling and swearing at them, and when they hesitate at that scary pinnacle, their freinds should scream at them some more."Man up." "Just f*cking go." It isn't much fun. That's your horse! You are your horse now.
When Fin freezes at something scary on a hack, I have no problem with giving him a top rope. He's slowly getting better at 'lead climbing,' but sometimes, you just need the damned top rope.
Thats the horse world for you! Always someone who thinks because they have done something a certain way for years, thats the only way and the right way. They justify it to themselves and others because thats the way its always been done.Why does this have to turn so snipey, ?
What does it matter how much experience anyone has ?
That video shows a man hitting a horse with a stick to try and convince it that there's nothing to be scared of .
Hardly someone to look up to is he ?
The man himself has apologised and admitted it was not the correct approach to take- so surely everyone else should just take this on board and accept it was not the correct approach?
Are you looking at the second time he hit it though?Thanks - I’m confused by that if I’m honest, while it’s not a technique I’d want used, I don’t think he’s actually hitting the horse with it, just scaring it fwds? My eyes are pretty crap and I’m watching on a phone screen so prepared to be shot down…
I don't think you have to have competed at a certain level in order to have an opinion on what that might entail...
however i do give credence to those who have done, because they might have insight that onlookers do not.
I've only nibbled round the edges of GP but the difference between PSG and GP was absolutely eyewatering in terms of effort required from horse and rider, just that tiny bit of experience was a bit of a shock to me, and I am someone that has watched GP riders competing and training for years. trying to do it myself was a reality check.
likewise i would not believe i could quite understand what it takes to event 5* from my experience at Novice.
I have an inkling. but I expect that actually making it happen on a daily basis is quite different.
none of that stops anyone from wanting to see the very best examples of horsemanship at all levels, of course, and theoretical discussions make up 90% of this forum so it also doesn't make anyone's opinion invalid IMO. but i do think it important to listen to those who have been there and done it.