Dressage Interesting study on conflict behaviours in dressage horses and scores

sbloom

Well-Known Member
Joined
14 September 2011
Messages
11,121
Location
Suffolk
www.stephaniebloomsaddlefitter.co.uk
Mind you, if they really wanted to demonstrate correct training through a reinback, they'd ask for a reinback away from the arena side. Reining patterns always have the reinback on the centre line, presumably to highlight whether a horse has been trained to back up straight or not.

The rocker was across the centre line at D/G.
 

tristar

Well-Known Member
Joined
23 August 2010
Messages
6,586
Visit site
i`m not too sure about the rocker, the object is to stop correctly then move forwards in a powerful movement, well mine is anyway!

i`ve never liked seeing people backing for long distances either


not sure that reining back after a sliding halt is the true aim of rein back either
 

sbloom

Well-Known Member
Joined
14 September 2011
Messages
11,121
Location
Suffolk
www.stephaniebloomsaddlefitter.co.uk
i`m not too sure about the rocker, the object is to stop correctly then move forwards in a powerful movement, well mine is anyway!

Most classical bods at the time didn't want it removed. Surely you can move forwards out of it in any way you chose? The first is to walk forwards calmly, then the second was whatever it was...so you could use it to prove you could power away from it...
 

eahotson

Well-Known Member
Joined
4 June 2003
Messages
4,448
Location
merseyside
Visit site
i`m not too sure about the rocker, the object is to stop correctly then move forwards in a powerful movement, well mine is anyway!

i`ve never liked seeing people backing for long distances either


not sure that reining back after a sliding halt is the true aim of rein back either
not all western riding is about reining.
 

tristar

Well-Known Member
Joined
23 August 2010
Messages
6,586
Visit site
Mind you, if they really wanted to demonstrate correct training through a reinback, they'd ask for a reinback away from the arena side. Reining patterns always have the reinback on the centre line, presumably to highlight whether a horse has been trained to back up straight or not.


it would show up crookedness clearly, or that straightness is a work in progress
 

j1ffy

Well-Known Member
Joined
27 January 2009
Messages
4,353
Location
Oxon
Visit site
It shows all of that, plus balance, trust, lightness, obedience, impulsion: all of it really. I am shocked that it's been removed.

The rocker or the rein-back? The rocker was before my time of watching dressage (would love to see it), the rein-back hasn’t been removed.
 

Gloi

Too little time, too much to read.
Joined
8 May 2012
Messages
12,289
Location
Lancashire
Visit site
The shaukel, or rein-back 5 steps-forward five steps-rein-back five steps. It was a wonderful test of, well, everything.
It surprises me how difficult some people I know who are riding dressage at medium or similar level find things like this. General manoeuvrability of the horse on the ground, backwards, forwards and sideways to do useful things when riding out or even to open and close the arena gate while mounted.
 

Cortez

Tough but Fair
Joined
17 January 2009
Messages
15,576
Location
Ireland
Visit site
It surprises me how difficult some people I know who are riding dressage at medium or similar level find things like this. General manoeuvrability of the horse on the ground, backwards, forwards and sideways to do useful things when riding out or even to open and close the arena gate while mounted.
TBF, a proper shaukel is a lot more than just reversing and going forwards. In Doma vaquera, Alta Escuela and WE (where it is also used) at the more advanced level it is often rein back, walk forwards, rein back, depart at trot or canter.
 

stangs

Well-Known Member
Joined
18 September 2021
Messages
2,867
Visit site
The shaukel, or rein-back 5 steps-forward five steps-rein-back five steps. It was a wonderful test of, well, everything.
Where I've seen the schaukel mentioned in books, I've seen in described as 4 steps forward, 2 steps back, and repeat. Were there variants found in competition or was it always 5-5?
 

Cortez

Tough but Fair
Joined
17 January 2009
Messages
15,576
Location
Ireland
Visit site
Where I've seen the schaukel mentioned in books, I've seen in described as 4 steps forward, 2 steps back, and repeat. Were there variants found in competition or was it always 5-5?
There can be different numbers of steps, it doesn't really matter as a training exercise.
 

sbloom

Well-Known Member
Joined
14 September 2011
Messages
11,121
Location
Suffolk
www.stephaniebloomsaddlefitter.co.uk
not something i would be doing, does not sound productive

It's a test, not a developmental exercise but obviously if it was in a test it would be something people would be doing occasionally to check on progress, though I suspect the brilliant, biomechanically correct trainers would barely need to.
 

tristar

Well-Known Member
Joined
23 August 2010
Messages
6,586
Visit site
It's a test, not a developmental exercise but obviously if it was in a test it would be something people would be doing occasionally to check on progress, though I suspect the brilliant, biomechanically correct trainers would barely need to.


halt is the test i use, rein back is more about submission and straightness, forwardness, rocking is a futile concept, to me, therefore i would never use it for either, i see it as not rewarding the horse for its obedience and understanding, as you don`t need to teach rein back it is installed by forwardness.

i get annoyed by references to mechanics ,well and perfection, i am riding horses! i never think in those terms, more in being lost in the moment when riding, having good moments and glimpses of where the horse is going and purely if it feels good and right

bio something or other is not for me, yesterday my little rescue `asked`me if he could canter for the first time, i said please do! mind you it was a good speed!, he is part trotter and goes like the clappers, but his transition was good and canter felt lovely, but i don`t over think these things, i get lost in the fun, no mechanics here sorry!
 

sbloom

Well-Known Member
Joined
14 September 2011
Messages
11,121
Location
Suffolk
www.stephaniebloomsaddlefitter.co.uk
i get annoyed by references to mechanics ,well and perfection, i am riding horses! i never think in those terms, more in being lost in the moment when riding, having good moments and glimpses of where the horse is going and purely if it feels good and right

bio something or other is not for me, yesterday my little rescue `asked`me if he could canter for the first time, i said please do! mind you it was a good speed!, he is part trotter and goes like the clappers, but his transition was good and canter felt lovely, but i don`t over think these things, i get lost in the fun, no mechanics here sorry!

You are clearly an educated rider with good feel, when I rode I struggled with good feel, I could have done with being taught a lot more about biomechanics. Don't diss it just because you don't need it, however I do use the term in the loosest way, a horse moving without compensatory patterns is the main aim.
 

eahotson

Well-Known Member
Joined
4 June 2003
Messages
4,448
Location
merseyside
Visit site
You are clearly an educated rider with good feel, when I rode I struggled with good feel, I could have done with being taught a lot more about biomechanics. Don't diss it just because you don't need it, however I do use the term in the loosest way, a horse moving without compensatory patterns is the main aim.
A very good way of putting it.
 

Cortez

Tough but Fair
Joined
17 January 2009
Messages
15,576
Location
Ireland
Visit site
halt is the test i use, rein back is more about submission and straightness, forwardness, rocking is a futile concept, to me, therefore i would never use it for either, i see it as not rewarding the horse for its obedience and understanding, as you don`t need to teach rein back it is installed by forwardness.

i get annoyed by references to mechanics ,well and perfection, i am riding horses! i never think in those terms, more in being lost in the moment when riding, having good moments and glimpses of where the horse is going and purely if it feels good and right

bio something or other is not for me, yesterday my little rescue `asked`me if he could canter for the first time, i said please do! mind you it was a good speed!, he is part trotter and goes like the clappers, but his transition was good and canter felt lovely, but i don`t over think these things, i get lost in the fun, no mechanics here sorry!
The "point" of all these exercises is not to have them as an end in themselves but as tests and building blocks towards the ultimate, they are all part of the endless quest for a goal of balance, lightness and ease, for both the horse and the rider. Modern dressage competition isn't that end goal BTW, Grand Prix is really just the completion of the "campaign" training; there are levels far beyond that and that is where exercises like the rein back, piaffe and pirouette are leading towards - the higher school and airs above the ground. I realise 99.9% of riders are not interested in that, but there is most definitely a point to the training and it's never futile.
 

tristar

Well-Known Member
Joined
23 August 2010
Messages
6,586
Visit site
but the rocker feels not right to me . i dislike the effect it has on the horses balance.


a good halt is an end to itself, and a test, also one the best foundations on which to build
 

Cortez

Tough but Fair
Joined
17 January 2009
Messages
15,576
Location
Ireland
Visit site
but the rocker feels not right to me . i dislike the effect it has on the horses balance.


a good halt is an end to itself, and a test, also one the best foundations on which to build








a good halt
Soto voce/whisper* perchance you may not be doing it quite as intended.......
Correctly executed, the shaukel will put the horse so deeply on his hocks it should be possible to perform a lançade directly out of it.
 
Top