Pearlsasinger
Up in the clouds
Of course the transference of risk has been assessed. you say i have very limited experience. I don't. A few meeting not correct. Over 200 that i personally convened and minute took, typed up an action plan (an agreed course of actions) which was sent out within 48hrs with minutes that i typed up from my notes during the meeting going out within a SLA timescale.
I only ever write what i know about from my experience, which by the way wasn't a 'few meetings'. I worked for almost 2 yrs (2 weeks shy) and only left as my position came up for permanancy and was filled by a perm member of staff and i was agency.
On my supervisors request i was asked to show this member of staff how i did my job. So i took her under my wing for weeks before she took my job off me despite reassurance from my boss this wouldn't happen and was not the intention. I then worked in another team but hated it so left.
I would never 'make up' stuff and find your tone very unkind.
Your tone is also very patronising tbh.
I'm withdrawing from this thread now as its obvious my point of view will not be considered and it is just giving certain individuals free rein to criticise me. I couldn't care less if you don't believe what i am saying but find it most strange that you would think i would make something up or try to glorify my skills, neither of which i have tried to do.
Are you seriously expecting us to believe that in 2 years a Local Authority needed to decide the employment future of at least 200 employees because of Safeguarding issues? I have no doubt that you took notes at 200 meetings but there would be a lot of questions to be asked if one area really had so many safeguarding issues that weren't picked up before the situation needed intervention from the LADO.
However when I see how you misinterpreted ycbm's post 443 which you replied to, I can understand how you misconstrued your work and why it wasn't made a permanent position.