FestiveG
Over the hill and far awa
When were the horses sold to the dealer, does anyone know?
It also doesn't make sense as it is incumbent upon the executor to maximise the value of the legacy. Selling horses individually or in small groups should have brought in more money than selling a job lot, even to a reputable dealer, let alone a bin-end dealer.I would still ask the question who were the people who advised that this was the best way to sell off the horses. Were they suitably experienced and did they have nothing to gain from emptying the yard?
And if the charity is a rehabilitation centre and some horses are still at the farm, were they not able to spend some time assessing and finding homes or selling the others individually from the farm.
Beginning of mayWhen were the horses sold to the dealer, does anyone know?
So there was no issue of not being able to access funds for keep for the horses, as probate was granted a good while prior to that.Beginning of may
We may never know the full facts of why/what happened
But we do know Janet didnt want her horses to ended up in a bin end dealers yard .
Im sure the aim of this post was to raise awareness and for everyone to keep their eyes out for any indigos and make the relevant FB admin aware .
The condition of the fields / size of the property isn’t relevant . It’s the welfare of Janet’s horses that’s all important
why wouldn't they be. The job of the exor was to wind up the estate. The other beneficiaries would expect things to be sold and their bequests to be paid out. Horses don't look after themselves. They need staff, food, hay, accommodation. That all has to be paid for. Presumably the time came to cut the expenditure.£4 million estate, and the horses were sold off
Apparently at least some of the horses could have been sold earlier, which would certainly have gone some way towards maximising value. Those horses keep would not have had to be paid for post sale. I can't see that this episode will have done the charity any long term good tbh.why wouldn't they be. The job of the exor was to wind up the estate. The other beneficiaries would expect things to be sold and their bequests to be paid out. Horses don't look after themselves. They need staff, food, hay, accommodation. That all has to be paid for. Presumably the time came to cut the expenditure.
Many of the comments re the selling of the horses are from horse people who think they could have been sold for more, to better homes, their problems dealt with etc.
Possibly a price was agreed for the sale to the Cauldwells and this was found to be acceptable to the beneficiaries.
t also doesn't make sense as it is incumbent upon the executor to maximise the value of the legacy. Selling horses individually or in small groups should have brought in more money than selling a job lot, even to a reputable dealer, let alone a bin-end dealer. (Sorry PAS quote didn't work)
The expenses in maximising the value may have been more than could be obtained. At the end of the day it is about the beneficiaries getting their money, sadly there didn't appear to be anything in the will about horse welfare.
He's ended up with some of them though which is a shame.Can I just clarify these horses have not been sold to the cauldwells
Do you know which dealer they were sold to?Can I just clarify these horses have not been sold to the cauldwells
It is. But the dealer who brought them knew all of there issues in detail, and didn’t disclose them when selling onHe's ended up with some of them though which is a shame.
I’m sorry I don’t feel comfortable with disclosing on here as they aren’t the nicest of people and they are just too close to homeDo you know which dealer they were sold to?
Raising awareness is what’s needed , I personally didn’t like some comments that imo where derogatory over Janet’s estate / quality of horses .Well yes of course, and I'm sure this post has raised awareness. But there was linked Facebook post with comments that then were being discussed on here, and actually, a bit of discussion, around what is a pretty unusual set of circumstances helps to both keep the post alive and raising more awareness for the horses, and reminds people to double check their own situation re wills and horses/animals.
You can get it online. I got a copy of my dad’s when I couldn’t find the original. You need JG’s real name and the lawyer needs to have published it, pretty standard with many firms. https://probatesearch.service.gov.uk/It would be interesting to see a copy of the will.
Of course, you’re right. But it would appear that there were several people wanting to purchase horses prior to them being sold to a dealer. But their approaches weren’t taken up. And, also, as the land doesn’t appear to have been sold (which I imagine would form the bulk of the estate) it doesn’t appear the beneficiaries were clammering for their share (speculation I know).why wouldn't they be. The job of the exor was to wind up the estate. The other beneficiaries would expect things to be sold and their bequests to be paid out. Horses don't look after themselves. They need staff, food, hay, accommodation. That all has to be paid for. Presumably the time came to cut the expenditure.
Many of the comments re the selling of the horses are from horse people who think they could have been sold for more, to better homes, their problems dealt with etc.
Possibly a price was agreed for the sale to the Cauldwells and this was found to be acceptable to the beneficiaries.
t also doesn't make sense as it is incumbent upon the executor to maximise the value of the legacy. Selling horses individually or in small groups should have brought in more money than selling a job lot, even to a reputable dealer, let alone a bin-end dealer. (Sorry PAS quote didn't work)
The expenses in maximising the value may have been more than could be obtained. At the end of the day it is about the beneficiaries getting their money, sadly there didn't appear to be anything in the will about horse welfare.
Fair comment.But how do people know the horses are suffering? It is possible many have found good homes. Dealers don't hang on to saleable horses.
Because potential buyers have searched their names and have got in touch with us. Some sedated and buted to be sold for a ridiculous price tag. How can you possibly sell horses with kissing spines, OCD lesions to ridden homes? This is exactly why they should have either stayed at Janet’s or PTSBut how do people know the horses are suffering? It is possible many have found good homes. Dealers don't hang on to saleable horses.
info you need is Janet George and dod 21/11/21You can get it online. I got a copy of my dad’s when I couldn’t find the original. You need JG’s real name and the lawyer needs to have published it, pretty standard with many firms. https://probatesearch.service.gov.uk/
18 of them to be preciseSo this will drafter and executor failed to understand (and draft) how much the welfare of her horses meant to Janet? To the extent that she allowed several of them to be sold in a job lot to a dealer?
Fair comment.
But it’s the principle of what’s happened that is objectionable. It absolutely goes against the wishes of JG.
I'm afraid that it simply raises the questions as to why JG didn't detail her wishes in her will and secondly surely if some were unsuitable to rehome she could have added a codicil to the will saying X, Y and Z should be PTS at home on her death.Because potential buyers have searched their names and have got in touch with us. Some sedated and buted to be sold for a ridiculous price tag. How can you possibly sell horses with kissing spines, OCD lesions to ridden homes? This is exactly why they should have either stayed at Janet’s or PTS
we have no idea if the beneficiaries were wanting their share. They may well have been pushing the exor.And, also, as the land doesn’t appear to have been sold (which I imagine would form the bulk of the estate) it doesn’t appear the beneficiaries were clammering for their share (speculation I know).
Also, knowing what the horses and her legacy meant to JG you’d have thought that the executor would have taken this on board (as they are permitted to do). That coupled with the legitimate, knowledge and professional views of staff can only lead to one conclusion.
Do the job, get paid. Get out of Dodge.
I'm sorry to be at odds here but the exor. was a professional doing her job. The welfare of the horses was up to Janet to make arrangements for.So this will drafter and executor failed to understand (and draft) how much the welfare of her horses meant to Janet?
Absolutely. Provide additional means for them in the “hand over” period (which can take some time) or state in the will for them to be pts upon your death within x time frame, in the safety and comfort of their home, in the manner of your choosing. And make sure the money is there for that too. All of this needs to be put clearly in our wills. And for dogs, cats and other pets too.It's what happens inbetween that also needs sorting. Money for feed, livery and everything else. You need to make some emergency measures as it’s so expensive to keep them. Who will pay in the meantime. Your horse maybe sold if your livery isn't paid.