Hound 'culling'

I always find in posts like this that the people that cannot have a sensible conversation/debate and resort to name calling actually know nothing about what they claim to be an expert on.

Greyhounds, although hunting hounds, are bred for a totally different purpose to foxhounds. They are designed for a two hundred yard sprint, catch the quarry on their own, then go back home to sleep for the rest of the day after their hard work. Foxhounds are bred to work in a pack and cover many miles per day. Fell hounds (although my knowledge of them is limited), will have been bred from hounds with different traits to foxhounds, so will be different again,
 
Speak for yourself there Wench - personally I know quite a lot about ex racing greyhounds having worked very closely with a rescue charity for a number of years as well as having my own greyhounds, what infuriates me is when people set themselves up as experts on something they clearly know nothing about, and spout rubbish which is totally untrue and inaccurate
 
I can't claim to be an expert on hounds or whether they would take to being re-homed when their working lives are over - I'd imagine many wouldn't be able to adjust, and we've heard that there are cases of those who do cope. However - if a hound has no other possible use or purpose other than hunting , then what is the justification of continuing to breed them (foxhounds at least) given hunting is illegal? Dog breeding that feeds other illegal activities i.e. breeding pitbulls for dog fighting, is shut down by police. I'm interested as to why foxhounds are still allowed to be bred. Whats the point?
 
I can't claim to be an expert on hounds or whether they would take to being re-homed when their working lives are over - I'd imagine many wouldn't be able to adjust, and we've heard that there are cases of those who do cope. However - if a hound has no other possible use or purpose other than hunting , then what is the justification of continuing to breed them (foxhounds at least) given hunting is illegal? Dog breeding that feeds other illegal activities i.e. breeding pitbulls for dog fighting, is shut down by police. I'm interested as to why foxhounds are still allowed to be bred. Whats the point?

Yeah thats a really good point
 
Lévrier;13161707 said:
I wouldn't bother LD&S, AlecSwan will talk total *******s about ex-racing greyhounds until the cows come home - he bases all his assumptions and the rubbish he spouts on the one person he appears to know, so of course he is a total "expert" in his own eyes.


Greyhounds are so lazy and if it's raining, well that's a whole another story as no doubt you know lol
 
I don't have any experience of foxhounds, but I agree that putting them to sleep at the end of their working lives isn't the end of the world! Its far far better than ending up in an unsuitable home. I gather that the breed needs a huge amount of exercise, have a pack mentality, high prey drive and have lived in kennels with their pack their whole lives. Doesn't exactly make the ideal pet and its hard (not impossible though) to meet their needs in a home environment. You would have to train them out of everything they have been bred and trained to do for their entire lives up to that point and I don't think that fair.

I don't understand how someone can be pro shooting a horse but anti shooting a dog. What's the difference?!

I don't personally eat meat but have no issue with those that do or farming for meat. Fine for a sheep/cow/pig to be bred for and killed for a purpose but everyone seems to get het up about it when its a "pet" type of animal. I've had a house rabbit in the past, doesn't bother me feeding my dog rabbit though!

I have a retired greyhound as a pet, he was miserable in kennels and as a result wouldn't chase so was rehomed at 18months. That instinct is there, he will chase anything small that runs but his energy levels are easily met in a home environment. He was never in a "pack" so that wasn't an issue.

Greyhounds and foxhounds are worlds apart!
 

Of course they do minesadouble, they are firearms trained (regularly) and firearms licensed holders. What would you do if you were called to an overturned truck carrying a hundred sheep on their way to a slaughter house over 100+ miles away to be made into curry, that were suffering hideously and dying as a result of the accident? Try to imagine the carnage? (with the OK of a vet of course, who may or quite likely may not have a firearms licence and firearm with him/her) or the deer involved in a road collision sustaining two compound fractured legs and is still trying it's utmost to scamble away?

I am very surprised they used captive bolt to kill those dogs I am not sure its legal. Free bullet is ok however I thought captive bolt is only classified as a means of stunning before bleeding.
I myself dispatch all my own animals including horses but would never use captive bolt.

Of course it's legal! Unlike a free fire bullet firearm, the risk, in perhaps a built up area, over concrete/hard ground blah de blah, a captive bolt is both legal and preferred, due to safety reasons (possible ricochet) However, it is necessary to 'pith' the animal immediately, which they do. From what I recall from being reliably informed, they carry both a captive bolt and free fire bullet gun.

No, perfectly legal P, as long as an animal isn't caused any deliberate or unnecessary suffering in the process, and using a firearm is pretty instant, if done correctly.

I think a lot of people are unaware of this and having never witnessed it, appear to think it's a violent or cruel method of PTS. Many old working dogs are swiftly and painlessly dispatched, without any prior knowledge, fear or anticipation, using a firearm. A friends father is a gamekeeper, he puts down a bowl of grub for his old dog, and that's the end... notwithstanding the grief he's left to suffer from losing a well loved and close friend.

Why not call the vet out to you so the dog doesnt have to go anywhere and experience the clinical environment?

Yes i agree, i have had horses both injected and shot and shot is much more humane for such a large animal. I just find it hard to understand the mentality of someone who can just shoot their dog, look into their face and shoot their loyal dog. Regardless of whether or not it needs putting down. I find it a reflection on that person really. Its one thing to shoot mans best friend, however to do it to your own dog, i find personally, something else. I t would to me be bad enough to do it to someone else's dog , whom you have no connection or bond with but your own dog.

As in my above post K&L, I understand that her father believes he has both a duty and a responsibility, himself, to ensure his old, knackered friend, is given a quick and painless exit, without worry or anticipation and it is his way of thanking the dog for its faithfull service, love and friendship.


We have a local lady of whom I'm very fond, and she has two 'retired' greyhounds. They're walked twice a day, and as many in their prison, they have not been let off their leads for at least two years. The poor creatures display stress levels which I'd have thought a blind person could see. Apparently not. The lady concerned has owned some fairly decent syndicated 'flat' horses, and the only deal that she'll sign up to is that when their racing days are over, they should be sent off to heaven. For some reason, that doesn't apply to greyhounds. Perhaps they're just a convenience to her, I'm not sure.

Alec.

How do you know she doesn't have access to 3 acres of secured ' go mental bat **** crazy' area in which her dogs hoone around? or are you just jumping to conclusions? again. Please enlighten us to how the dogs display these stress levels, assuming I am both blind and have no knowledge of keeping Greyhounds. and as for saying 'perhaps they're a convenience to her' how bloody rude, do you throw into the ring, a little bone of contention deliberately in an effort to promote a response? (as it appears) or do you genuinely feel this way? :D (* ducking for cover, awaiting your response)

I hope you never get considered 'past it', and i hope people dont use the same assessment on quality of life that you have done for hounds here tonight or you may end up with a bullet too.

LOL :D
 
I can't claim to be an expert on hounds or whether they would take to being re-homed when their working lives are over - I'd imagine many wouldn't be able to adjust, and we've heard that there are cases of those who do cope. However - if a hound has no other possible use or purpose other than hunting , then what is the justification of continuing to breed them (foxhounds at least) given hunting is illegal? Dog breeding that feeds other illegal activities i.e. breeding pitbulls for dog fighting, is shut down by police. I'm interested as to why foxhounds are still allowed to be bred. Whats the point?

The 'point' is that generally, those who Hunt do so within the Law.

Alec.
 
Trail hunting is not illegal which is what fox hounds are used for...

The whole breeding, training etc seems such a rigmarole just to facilitate a drag hunt, which is essentially a pre-planned cross country ride so you don't actually need hounds to guide it
 
The whole breeding, training etc seems such a rigmarole just to facilitate a drag hunt, which is essentially a pre-planned cross country ride so you don't actually need hounds to guide it
But then farmers wouldn't generally offer their land up for a jolly xc ride out if they didn't get anything out of it ie fallen stock services.

Also if foxhounds were not bred any more, that would be a historic hound breed, that probably has the longest traceable pedigree of any type of dog, extinct
 
The whole breeding, training etc seems such a rigmarole just to facilitate a drag hunt, which is essentially a pre-planned cross country ride so you don't actually need hounds to guide it

Clearly, you have no understanding of 'hound work'. Hunting, be it for a quarry or a laid track, is about Hounds and how they Hunt.

Alec.
 
The 'point' is that generally, those who Hunt do so within the Law.

Alec.

Fair enough - I don't know much about the current hunting situation so have no reason to disagree with you. Myself, in the grand scheme of things I've never thought hunting was the cruellest thing we do to animals, so was not massively anti (although not pro either) but I do believe in the rule of law. And that means following the spirit of the law, not just the letter and finding loopholes in it
 
Clearly, you have no understanding of 'hound work'. Hunting, be it for a quarry or a laid track, is about Hounds and how they Hunt.

Alec.


I do understand that hunting is about the hounds and how they work together and with the huntsmen and women. And those that follow the hunt so they can have a fun and exciting ride are secondary. My point is that if it's only trail hunting and/or drag hunting thats allowed, is the industry not pretty much finished? Can we still justify breeding these 'working dogs' (with associated need to cull many healthy dogs) if their only 'job' is messing about following fake trails for a bit of fun?
 
……..

How do you know she doesn't have access to 3 acres of secured ' go mental bat **** crazy' area in which her dogs hoone around? or are you just jumping to conclusions? again.

Please enlighten us to how the dogs display these stress levels, assuming I am both blind and have no knowledge of keeping Greyhounds.

and as for saying 'perhaps they're a convenience to her' how bloody rude, do you throw into the ring, a little bone of contention deliberately in an effort to promote a response? (as it appears) or do you genuinely feel this way? :D (* ducking for cover, awaiting your response)

LOL :D

She lives but 3 doors away.

If you are unable, as most, to recognise an animal under stress by their demeanour and body language, then perhaps you could think before you criticise those who do.

Yes, I certainly feel as I do. I'm very fond of the lady concerned, even when her bloody dogs escape and kill my livestock, and however well intentioned she may believe that she is, she's sadly blind to the unhappiness of her dogs.

Alec.
 
If you're belief is that these hounds are only 'messing about', then you have little in the way of understanding of what Hounds are actually about.

Alec.

So what is their job? Are they providing a necessary service like a police dog or a guide dog?

I have already said I'm far from an expert on hunting with hounds. Haven't been since way back in the mists of time when I was in the pony club - and would not do it now.
 
Do you keep a dog? If you do, what's it's purpose in life?

Alec.

Yes, two small terriers. They're pets so their only purpose is companionship, they mooch around the farm and come on long walks with us. This conversation is about hounds, who have been classed as working dogs, not pets - and many including yourself have said they have no other function and do not make good pets, which I agree with. My point, in asking you what their 'job' is nowadays, is that if they are not really allowed by law to control foxes any more in any meaningful way, then their job is defunct. I guess that much like some dogs are bred for showing, they are maybe bred to keep the tradition alive and that hunting people enjoy working on their craft with the hounds. It just seems a shame in that case that they are shot at 7 as a matter of course
 
I have a few genuine questions:

1) It is my understanding (correct me if I'm wrong) that young hunting hounds/dogs are sometimes foster homed for a while when they are puppies to get them used to people and to learn social skills. If an adult hound/dog cannot remember those formative weeks/months with their puppy walkers (and return to that lifestyle as and when), why is it done in the first place?

2) I am confused as to why it is applauded when a retired or failed, but healthy race horse is given a second chance to flourish in an alternative role, yet it is seen as cruel to give a hound/dog that opportunity? The distinction seems false. The race horse has been bred for centuries to race, the hound has been bred for centuries to hunt. What is the difference?

No-one can deny that a horse's instinct is to roam free in a herd, but of course we can't (on the whole) let them do that for obvious reasons, so it is acceptable to do the next best thing - to provide a semi-natural environment in the form of an enclosed paddock with grazing and companionship. Many horses would love that paddock gate to be left open and to run free, but to keep them safe we have to enclose them. Why is it different for a hound/dog? Why would say a large country garden with lots of room for a hound or two to run and sniff be so different to a thoroughbred's paddock?
 
Clodagh, there are those that cannot, or will not accept your point. A point well made nonetheless.

We have a local lady of whom I'm very fond, and she has two 'retired' greyhounds. They're walked twice a day, and as many in their prison, they have not been let off their leads for at least two years. The poor creatures display stress levels which I'd have thought a blind person could see. Apparently not. The lady concerned has owned some fairly decent syndicated 'flat' horses, and the only deal that she'll sign up to is that when their racing days are over, they should be sent off to heaven. For some reason, that doesn't apply to greyhounds. Perhaps they're just a convenience to her, I'm not sure.

Alec.

I think maybe you forgot to tell us about the signs of stress these dogs are exhibiting that are so obvious a blind person could see.
 
Yes, two small terriers. They're pets so their only purpose is companionship, they mooch around the farm and come on long walks with us. ……..

So your two terriers provide a 'necessary service'(your words)? Can you explain to me why Hounds shouldn't do the same?

I have a few genuine questions:

1) It is my understanding (correct me if I'm wrong) that young hunting hounds/dogs are sometimes foster homed for a while when they are puppies to get them used to people and to learn social skills. If an adult hound/dog cannot remember those formative weeks/months with their puppy walkers (and return to that lifestyle as and when), why is it done in the first place?

2) I am confused as to why it is applauded when a retired or failed, but healthy race horse is given a second chance to flourish in an alternative role, yet it is seen as cruel to give a hound/dog that opportunity? The distinction seems false. The race horse has been bred for centuries to race, the hound has been bred for centuries to hunt. What is the difference?

No-one can deny that a horse's instinct is to roam free in a herd, but of course we can't (on the whole) let them do that for obvious reasons, so it is acceptable to do the next best thing - to provide a semi-natural environment in the form of an enclosed paddock with grazing and companionship. Many horses would love that paddock gate to be left open and to run free, but to keep them safe we have to enclose them. Why is it different for a hound/dog? Why would say a large country garden with lots of room for a hound or two to run and sniff be so different to a thoroughbred's paddock?

1) Hound puppies are, as you say 'walked' and to teach them the basic skills of dealing with humans. The problem arises with walking puppies in that they are generally sent back to kennels when their natural instincts take over, and they become unmanageable. Hound pups will very soon become unruly and will be sent to school! Not all of course, but most, if they're to be of any use!

2) The link to horses in training is interesting, and of all the thousands which are bred every year, VERY few settle to being happy hackers. OK, so the odd one will go on and Event or Hunt or find a second career, but they're in the minority, aren't they? It's the training regime which is responsible.

If the large and well fenced country garden could contain a couple of retired Hounds, then what would they do all day, apart from dig holes, bury bones and generally turn the place in to a tip? Oh, and probably wake the dead in the middle of the night whilst they voice their frustrations! :) It would be a lovely idea, but not one that would really be kind to the animal.

Alec.
 
Last edited:
I think maybe you forgot to tell us about the signs of stress these dogs are exhibiting that are so obvious a blind person could see.

Sadly, 'telling' is impossible, it's either something which we see with our own eyes, or we don't. I've had others try to explain to me the finer points of ballet, but I fail to see the emphasis which they bring. Similarly, and with animals which are stressed, it's something which we either recognise, or we don't.

Where do your abilities lay? Could you describe them and the nuances of them to me?

Alec.
 
Sadly, 'telling' is impossible, it's either something which we see with our own eyes, or we don't. I've had others try to explain to me the finer points of ballet, but I fail to see the emphasis which they bring. Similarly, and with animals which are stressed, it's something which we either recognise, or we don't.

Where do your abilities lay? Could you describe them and the nuances of them to me?

Alec.

But surely even to someone as uneducated in the ways of stressed greyhounds as me would be able to understand one or two of the finer points that you have said are so obvious. Or maybe this is yet another of your posts that when you are asked a direct question you choose to ignore it and ask a question in response.
 
…….. . Or maybe this is yet another of your posts that when you are asked a direct question you choose to ignore it and ask a question in response.

The list of stress indicators, those of which we should be aware, are near endless. Body Language (the dog's demeanour) matters. Tail carriage matters. Eye contact (or the lack of it) matters. Panting when the dog's been for a walk but hasn't exerted itself matters. A dog licking its lips, sometimes matters. Constant yawning always matters. Self harm (often breed specific) matters. Loose bowel movements can also be an indication of stress. The list is endless and I've only scratched the surface. When you travel a dog in a car and for a considerable time, do they sleep? Most dogs hate car travel, surprisingly, even though they happily jump in when asked.

Do you recognise the signs of 'stress' in a dog, or are you simply looking for an argument? Your turn. :)

Alec.
 
So your two terriers provide a 'necessary service'(your words)? Can you explain to me why Hounds shouldn't do the same?





2) The link to horses in training is interesting, and of all the thousands which are bred every year, VERY few settle to being happy hackers. OK, so the odd one will go on and Event or Hunt or find a second career, but they're in the minority, aren't they? It's the training regime which is responsible.

I must take issue with you here Alec, I belong to a fb group that has thousands of members who all own ex racehorses and they would all disagree with you because their horses disprove your statement.
 
gosh, how did a thread on culling foxhounds turn into a 'downer' on retired greyhounds? I've known several retired greyhounds - a few of my friends have had them, my uncle, and my Dad's best friend, bless him, when he was alive. To my mind they make great companion dogs. The only 'stress' I ever saw was one who had separation distress when left, that one was my friend's dog, and she just went and got another greyhound - problem solved! (She was never leaving them for a long time, only for a couple of hours as she is semi-retired and works from home). They are total comfort lovers and seem very affectionate to their owners, and the ones I've seen are easy and well-mannered to walk on the lead. I think you've got to be sensible and responsible about whether you let them off lead or not, and where, but that's the same with all dogs.
 
……..

2) The link to horses in training is interesting, and of all the thousands which are bred every year, VERY few settle to being happy hackers. OK, so the odd one will go on and Event or Hunt or find a second career, but they're in the minority, aren't they? It's the training regime which is responsible.

I must take issue with you here Alec, I belong to a fb group that has thousands of members who all own ex racehorses and they would all disagree with you because their horses disprove your statement.

Considering the number of Flat Bred TBs bred annually, the level of rehabilitation, and in to an ordinary ridden life, is in single figures as a percentage. I'll stand by that. The bulk are put down when their racing days are over, and it's only because of their training regimes, I feel (almost) certain! I applaud those who take them on and make a success of them, but those with the necessary skills are few and far between. Do you agree, or do you consider that in the main most F/B horses will go on to second careers?

I'll accept that there will be those (few) NH horses which will go off hunting, but they'll be few and far between.

Alec.
 
Top