ponynutz
Well-Known Member
Keep us updated - alarm bells are ringing slightly for me but not enough to think there's any evasion for definite yet.
Just go and get him tomorrow and then you won’t need to deal with all that hassle.I went to see him today….long story…mentioned moving him when I was there (as expected it went down like a ton of bricks) and then when I got home due to something she had breeched in contract I sent a message. It got very nasty and I was sent a tirade of absolutely disgusting messages telling me I’m a terrible person, terrible horse woman, she feels sorry for the horse and karma will get me blah blah. I chose to ignore it and be to the point and it got worse with her telling me she is blocking me for the remainder of the notice (she chose not to take up the share) and to contact someone else if I wanted to get in touch.
I am exhausted, drained and flabbergasted tbh that discussing a contractual breech and ending a loan (well not exactly ending it because I offered her to continue at my place) would cause such nasty behaviour.
I will deal with everything tomorrow as she is refusing to pay for transport to get him back to me as per our contract. In fact, she threatened me twice with the police for A messaging her in the first place and B expecting her to transport him back to be as per the contract she signed.
Who knew that taking a horse back would be so traumatic.
If any loaner 'gave me a mouthful' then I would be collecting the horse straight away.
In fact they did, and I did - brushes were being hurled across the yard at me - and thank goodness I called time when I did, or the horse would have been even more broken than it soon turned out she already was .
But if the refusal to pay for transport back , is the breach of contract then that can’t be proved before the month is up and the horse is due to go back so at this stage may not even a breach and certainly not a reason to take the horse back now. Sounds heartless to me, especially as she will have paid a months livery upfront and need to give her livery a months notice.
I find the lack of compassion in the whole thing to be very sad.
And I’m not surprised the loaner got upset and a little bit nasty , with a shock like that I would too.
Unless a serious breach of contract has occurred then at least give the loaner the month left with the horse by contract she is entitled to.
And the shoes!i actually gave her 60 days notice, which is more than enough and offered her to continue with him at my yard. I was very fair. The breech was the fact that he was on a strict hacking only loan and she had been having lessons etc. which was not the life he was enjoying at the time.
had this been discussed with me as well as a few minor other things it may have been a little different.
In that case I apologise, you’re right that is fair . And the contract breach not major, I would actually be quite pleased someone was having lessons on my loan horse as even if we only hack there is nearly always room for improvement, but agree it should have been discussed first.i actually gave her 60 days notice, which is more than enough and offered her to continue with him at my yard. I was very fair. The breech was the fact that he was on a strict hacking only loan and she had been having lessons etc. which was not the life he was enjoying at the time.
had this been discussed with me as well as a few minor other things it may have been a little different.
In that case I apologise, you’re right that is fair . And the contract breach not major, I would actually be quite pleased someone was having lessons on my loan horse as even if we only hack there is nearly always room for improvement.
I still can’t believe the lack of compassion with the posters saying take your horse back now . Heartless! And no you are not entitled to collect a horse on loan with a contract now if there is not a contract breach, you have to give notice!
I disagree but as I said when I amended my post I do agree it should have been discussed first .Just going on face value - if I loaned a horse specifically for hacking it would be for the horses welfare or quality of life. A loaner then having lessons is a blatant breach of contract. I am generally a poster happy to play devils advocate on most things, but in this situation I would not hesitate to retrieve my horse with zero notice.
Quite frankly I find it weird that you left this horse with her so long, given historical issues. I also find the saddle thing weird and the past legal issue weird. We obviously only hear your side of things.
But the biggest thing I find weird (given you have every right to collect your horse from a lunatic, again I’m taking everything at face value) - is why the latest update isn’t ‘right, just off to collect him, wish me luck!’